In its recent Green Paper on local government finance, the British Government has proposed that the existing system of nondomestic rates be replaced by a uniform and centrally determined rate poundage. This idea has merit in principle in that it could improve the accountability of local authorities to local residents. But it is argued that the particular proposals in the Green Paper are deficient in ignoring the need for accountability in services provided to local businesses, and in failing to examine the rationale for retaining business rates within a reformed system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennettRJ, 1986, “The impact of non-domestic rates on profitability and investment”Fiscal Studies7(1) 34–50
CIPFA, 1987General Financial Statistics 1986/87Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, London
4.
CrawfordPFothergillSMonkS, 1985The Effect of Business Rates on the Location of EmploymentDepartment of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
5.
DoE, 1986Paying for Local Government Department of the Environment, Cmnd 9714 (HMSO, London)
6.
FosterCDJackmanRA, 1982, “Accountability and control of local spending”Public Money2(2) 11–14
7.
JackmanRA, 1976, “On the rating of non-domestic hereditaments”, evidence to the Committee of Enquiry into Local Government Finance, Cmnd 6453, Appendix 9 (HMSO, London)
8.
JackmanRA, 1982, “Does central government need to control the total of local government spending?”Local Government Studies8(3) 75–90
9.
JackmanRA, 1985, “Local government finance”, in Half a Century of Municipal Decline Eds LoughlinMGelfandDYoungK, (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 144–168
10.
KingMAFullertonD, 1984The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden and West Germany (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
11.
MairD, 1986, “Industrial de-rating: Panacea or palliative?”Scottish Journal of Political Economy33(2), 159–70
