The purpose of this paper is to obtain new evidence about a fundamental question of empirical studies on technology policy. Is public R&D a complement to or a substitute for private R&D? We examine, at an industry level, the relationship between private R&D expenditures and public subsidies in Spain, using panel data and controlling the interindustry differences in technological opportunities. The results suggest that public subsidies have complemented private R&D. This is an interesting result because technology policy was reoriented in the 1990s with a reduction of direct government subsidies for R&D and an increase in tax incentives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArellanoMBondS, 1991, “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”Review of Economic Studies58277–297
2.
ArrowK, 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions”, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Ed. NelsonR (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 609–625
3.
de EspañaBanco, 2004Informe anual 2003 [Annual Report 2003], Banco de España, Madrid
4.
BuisseretTCameronHGeorghiuL, 1995, “What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms”International Journal of Technology Management10587–600
5.
BusomI, 2000, “An empirical evaluation of R&D subsidies”Economics of Innovation and New Technology9(2) 111–148
6.
CallejónMCalzadaJGarcia-QuevedoJRiberaR, 2000Tecnologia y politica industrial [Technology and industrial policy] Associació d'Amics de la Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya
7.
CapronH, 1992Economic Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of the Impact of R&D Programmes EUR 14864 EN (European Commission, Brussels)
8.
CapronHVan PottelsbergheB, 1997, “Public support to business R&D: A survey and some new quantitative evidence”, in Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology Towards Best Practices (OECD, Paris) pp 171–188
9.
COTEC, 2000Relaciones para la innovación de las empresas con las administraciones [Relations for innovation between firms and administrations] Fundación COTEC para la innovación tecnológica, Madrid
10.
COTEC, 2004Elsistema español de innovación: Situación en 2004 [The Spanish system of innovation: Situation in 2004] Fundación COTEC para la innovación tecnológica, Madrid
11.
DavidPHallB, 2000, “Heart of darkness: Modeling public-private funding interactions inside the R&D black box”, WP 7538, National Bureau for Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
12.
DavidPHallBTooleA, 2000, “Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence”Research Policy29497–529
13.
European Commission, 2002Industrial Policy in an Enlarged Europe COM(2002) 714 (European Commission, Brussels)
14.
GannicottK, 1984, “The determinants of industrial R&D in Australia”Economic Record60231–235
15.
García-QuevedoJ, 2004, “Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence”Kyklos5787–102
16.
GoolsbeeA, 1998, “Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers?”American Economic Review88298–302
17.
GrilichesZ, 1995, R&D and productivity: Econometric results and measurement issues”, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Ed. StonemanP (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 52–89
18.
GrossmanGHelpmanE, 1991Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
19.
GuellecDVan PottelsbergheB, 2001, “The effectiveness of public policies in R&D”Revue d'Économie Industrielle9449–68
20.
KaukoK, 1996, “Effectiveness of R&D subsidies—a sceptical note on the empirical literature”Research Policy25321–323
21.
KellerW, 2002, “Geographic localization of international technology diffusion”American Economic Review92120–142
LichtenbergF, 1984, “The relationship between federal contract R&D and company R&D”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings7473–78
24.
LichtenbergF, 1987, “The effect of government funding on private industrial research and development: A re-assessment”The Journal of Industrial Economics36(1) 97–104
25.
LuukkonenT, 2000, “Additionality of EU framework programmes”Research Policy29711–724
26.
MamuneasT, 1999, “Spillovers from publicly financed R&D capital in high-tech industries”International Journal of Industrial Organization17215–239
27.
MamuneasTNadiriM, 1996, “Public R&D policies and cost behaviour of the US manufacturing industries”Journal of Public Economics6357–81
28.
MansfieldE, 1964, “Rates of return from industrial and research development”American Economic Review55310–322
29.
MartinC, 1999, “La posición tecnológica de la economía española en Europa. Una evaluación global” [The technological position of the Spanish economy in Europe: A global evaluation]Papeles de Economia Española812–19
30.
OECD, 1999Managing National Innovation Systems (OECD, Paris)
31.
PiquéJ, 1999, “La nueva política de fomento de la innovación del MINER” [The new MINER policy in support of innovation]Papeles de Economía Española81276–283
32.
RyeM, 2002, “Evaluating the impact of public support on commercial research and development projects”Evaluation8(2) 227–248
33.
Van PottelsbergheB, 1997The Efficiency of Science and Technlogy Policies inside the Triad PhD thesis, Department of Applied Economics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
