Two very different dimensions of Hungary's housing problem are investigated. One relates to historical factors, mainly the poor housing stock which existed prior to 1949, and is indicated by persistent housing shortages. The other dimension concerns access and allocation mechanisms, both in rented and owned accommodation, and raises questions of social policy. Thus there are at least two ways of evaluating housing policy: In terms of absolute levels of provision—usually measured by standards and shortages—and in terms of relative levels—measured by how fair is the access to housing of different types by different groups in the population. The first method reveals that Hungary, despite severe housing shortages, has made great strides in recent years. However, in terms of equality of housing provision, the problem which seems endemic to several Eastern European countries—the better-off groups get most of the available good quality housing at low rents—is persisting through into the owner-occupied sector as this sector begins to take off because of a large expansion since 1970 of mortgage credit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarathE, (Ed.), 1981Orszagos Teruletrendezési Terv Konceptio (The National Physical Planning Idea) Varosépités Tudomanyos es Tervesö Intézet (Research Institute for Town Building and Planning) 11 (Regionalis Iroda, Budapest)
2.
BarathE, 1983, “Decentralizalasi tendenciak a magyar településhalozat fejleszteseben a 70-es évtizedben” (“Decentralisation tendencies of Hungarian physical planning in the 70s”Varosépités19 (2) 26–30
3.
BeluszkyPSikosTT, 1981, “Vas Megye Falusi Településeinek Tipusai” (“Types of rural settlements in Vas County”)Településtudománnyi Közleménnyek (Town Planning Studies Publications)30100–127; Budapesti Muszaki Egyetem, H-1521 Budapest Central Committee, 1970, “A Magyar Szocialista Munkáspart Központi Bizottsaga” (“The Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party Central Committee”) Minutes of Meeting, 10 March 1970 (Kossuth Könyvkiado, Budapest)
4.
Central Committee, 1978, “A Magyar Szocialista Munkáspart Központi Bizottsaga” (“The Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party Central Committee”) Minutes of Meeting, 12 October 1978 (Kossuth Könyvkiado, Budapest)
5.
Council of Ministers, 1975, “Elóterjesztés a Minisztertanacs részére a lakásépítés és gazdalkodas 1990-ig szolo tervrol” (“Report by the Council of Ministers on House Building and Management until 1990”) Minisztertanacs Tanácsi Hivatal (Council of Ministers) (Kossuth Kònyvkiado, Budapest)
6.
Cseh-SzombathyL, 1979, “A csaladpolitika celja, tartalmi kore, eszkoz rendszere” (“The aims of family politics, and the maintenance of good proportion in the means of production”, in Tarsadalmi Terveszesi Fuzetek 3Országos Tervhivatal Tervgazdasagi Intezete (National Economic Planning Office), Budapest
7.
Di MaioA J, 1974Soviet Urban Planning: Problems and Politics (Praeger, New York)
8.
DolecskoK, 1983, “Hoi tart a budapesti lakásgazdalkodás?” (“Where is the Budapest housing market?”, in Népszabadsag (People's Freedom) 7 May, page 9
9.
ÉGSZI, 1979, “Építésgazdasági és szervezés” (“Housing economy and management”) 4884/5 Tanulmány (Studies), Építésgazdasági és Szervezési Intézet (Housing Economy and Management Institute), Budapest
10.
FalusG, 1983, “Garzonhaz Egerben” (“Bachelors' flats in Eger”, in Népszabadsag (People's Freedom) 26 March, page 3
11.
GrossKVaskoMGecziJ, 1983, “A városépítés kérdési harom megye egyvttmukodesrol” (“Questions involved in joint planning in three counties”)Városépités19 (1) 3–8
12.
GyözönéK, 1978, “A falusi lakokörnyezet alakulasrol” (“The living environment of villages”, in Szövetkezeti Kutató Intézeti Közlemények (Cooperative Research Institute Publications)135.
HoffmannI, 1983, “A folyomatos árszinvonal—emelkedés hatása a lakásépitésre” (“The impact of the continuous price rise on housing construction”)Közgazdasagi Szemle30608–621
15.
HorváthT, 1983, “Morognak a lakók” (“The natives are grumbling”)Magyarország2035
16.
KonradGSzelenyiI, 1969Sociological Aspects of the Allocation of HousingSociological Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest
17.
KonradGSzelenyiI, 1971, “A késleltett városfejlodës társadalmi konfliktusai” (“Social conflicts arising from delayed urban development”)Valóság15 (12) 19–35
18.
KönyvkiadoKossuth, 1976Az Eletszinvonal Alakulasa Magyarorszagon 1950–1975 (The Formation of Living Standards in Hungary 1950–1975) (Kossuth Könyvkiado, Budapest)
19.
KSH, 1973, “Népszamlálas 1970 26 kötet” (“Population census 1970”)Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (Central Statistical Office), H-1525 Budapest
20.
KSH, 1978, “Lakásépités és megszünés 1977” (“Constructions and demolitions 1977”) Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (Central Statistical Office), H-1525 Budapest
PálD, 1981, “Gazdásagfejlesztési irányok és térbeni összefüggéseik” (“Internal coherence in economic planning”)Városépités516–25
31.
SzelenyiI, 1983Urban Inequalities under State Socialism (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
SzelényiZ, 1972, “Housing system and social structure” in Hungarian Sociological Studies Ed. HalmosP; Sociological Review Monographs, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
33.
TomássyI, 1983, “A magánlakásépités helyzete Nográd Megyeben” (“Private house-building in Nográd County”)Városépités19 (2) 8–10
34.
United Nations, 1978A Statistical Survey of the Housing Situation in the EEC Countries Around 1970 (United Nations, New York)
35.
United Nations, 1981Annual Bulletin of Housing and Building Statistics for Europe (United Nations, New York)
36.
VargaE, 1983, “A telekalakitasi eljarásrol” (“Procedures for the arrangement of building plots”)Városépités19 (3) 31
37.
VATI, 1971Orszagos Telepüuléshalozat-Fejlesztési Koncepcio (The National Physical Planning Idea) Épitésügyi és Városféjlesztési Miniszterium (Ministry of Town Building and Planning) — Városépités Tudomanyos és Tervesö Intézet (Research Institute for Town Building and Planning), Budapest
