In this article, I reflect upon the new pressures placed upon legal services systems in different countries over the past few years through a combination of economic recession and political hostility. I seek to argue that, although the short-term effects of these pressures upon legal aid structures may well be very harmful, in the long term a number of benefits may accrue. I argue that there are three distinct ways in which legal services schemes can reap positive benefit from attack. First, cutbacks in legal aid provide a real-life framework in which to test the validity of the theoretical and political critique of the philosophy of legal aid put forward by legal sociologists over the past decade; second, the need for a delivery system to be justified in terms of cost has led to surprising results that indicate the cost-effectiveness of more radical delivery models; third, economic restraint within the radical fringe of legal aid activity has itself stimulated a creativity of approach, and a forging of original and effective alliances, that would have been less likely in a more financially stable framework.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrawalK B, 1983, “Indian national report” paper presented to the 7th International Congress on Procedural Law, Würzburg, September; copy available from Professor F Zemans, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Downsview, Ontario, Canada
Australian Labor Party, 1983, “Law and justice” policy launched by Senator Gareth Evans, Shadow Attorney General, 23 January; copy available from the Attorney General's Department, Canberra, ACT, Australia
4.
BankowskiZMunghamG, 1976Images of Law (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Henley-on-Thames, Oxon)
5.
Benson Commission, 1979Report of the Royal Commission on Legal Services in England and Wales. Volume 2: Surveys and Studies Chairman Sir Henry Benson; Cmnd 7648 (HMSO, London)
6.
BlankenburgE, 1980Innovations in the Legal Services (Gunn and Hain, Oelgeschlagen)
7.
BlankenburgECooperJ, 1982, “Legal aid literature in Europe”Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2263–292
8.
BrantinghamPBurnsP, 1981, “The Burnaby, British Columbia Experimental Public Defender Project: An evaluation” research report, Department of Justice of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
9.
BregerM J, 1982, “Legal aid for the poor: A conceptual analysis”North Carolina Law Review60282–363
10.
BruinsmaF, 1980, “The (non)assertion of welfare rights”Acta Politica15357–383
11.
BruinsmaF, 1981, “Om de Kwaliteit van de Rechtshulp op de Buros voor Rechtshulp” research report; copy available from BruinsmaF, Department of Sociology of Law, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
12.
CappellettiM, 1981, “The law making power of the judge and its limits: A comparative analysis”Monash University Law Review815–67
13.
CappellettiMGarthB, (Eds), 1978Access to Justice: A World Survey. Volume II, Book I (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn)
14.
CappellettiMGarthB, 1983Settlement of Disputes out of Court: The Trend Towards Conciliation (Economica, Paris)
15.
CappellettiMGarthBTrockerN, 1982, “Access to justice: Variations and continuity of a world wide movement” in Rabeis Zeitschriftvolume 46, book 4, series R2; Ed. MohrJ C B, (Paul Siebeck, Tübingen) pp 665–816
16.
Civil Justice and Disputes Processing, 1982, “Disputes processing research program of University of Wisconsin Law School, 1977–1982” research report; copy available from the Law School, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
17.
CooperJ, 1981Public Legal Services in Three Countries: A Study of the Relationship Between Policy and Practice PhD thesis, School of Law, Middlesex Polytechnic, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, England
18.
CooperJ, 1983Public Legal Services: A Comparative Study of Policy, Politics and Practice (Sweet and Maxwell, London)
19.
CooperJ, 1984, “Public legal services in a recession: An analysis of survival” WP-7, Faculty of Business Studies and Management, Middlesex Polytechnic, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, England
20.
CSJ, 1982, “Évaluation de l'aide judiciaire” research report, Commission des Services Juridiques, Quebec Government, Government House, Quebec, Canada
21.
DentiV, 1979, “An international overview on legal aid” in Perspectives on Legal Aid: A Comparative Survey Ed. ZemansF H, (Frances Pinter, London) pp 3–11
22.
DooleyJHousemanA, 1982, “Legal services in the 80's and challenges facing the poor”Clearinghouse Review January issue, pp 704–712
23.
EisensteinM, 1978, “The Swedish Public Complaints Board: Its vital role in a system of consumer protection” in Access to Justice: A World Survey. Volume II, Book I Eds CappellettiMGarthB, (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn) pp 491–587
24.
EvansG, 1983, “Interview with Gareth Evans”Legal Services Bulletin8160–163
25.
FelstinerW, 1974, “Influences of social organisation on dispute processing”Law and Society Review963–94
26.
FriedmanL M, 1978, “Access to justice: Social and historical context” in Access to Justice: A World Survey. Volume II, Book I Eds CappellettiMGarthB, (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn) pp 3–36
27.
GalanterM, 1976, “The duty not to deliver legal services”University of Miami Law Review40929–951
28.
GraceC, 1983, “A strategic approach”Legal Action Group Bulletin June issue, pp 13–14
29.
HarkinsJ P, 1976, “Federal legal aid in Australia” paper presented to the International Colloquium on Legal Aid and Delivery of Legal Services, London, 25–28 October; Colloquium Proceedings available from the International Common Law Exchange Society, 5 Palo Alto Square, Suite 283, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
30.
HorowitzD, 1977The Courts and Social Policy (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
31.
JohnsonE, 1978Justice and Reform: The Formative Years of the OEO Legal Services Program (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)
32.
KatzJ, 1982Poor People's Lawyers in Transition (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
33.
Law Centres' News1983, Autumn issue; Law Centres' Federation, 164 Cromer Street, London WC1, England
34.
LCSRP, 1983, Law Centres' Staff Research Project, Law Centres' Federation, 164 Cromer Street, London WC1, England
35.
Legal Services Bulletin1983, “Letter to the Editor”; volume 8, issue 4, page 196
36.
LiebermanJ C, 1980, “Management failures in legal services programs: A structural dilemma”Clearinghouse Review June issue, pp 139–152
37.
Lord Chancellor's Department, 198232nd Legal Aid Annual Reports, 1981–1982 (HMSO, London)
38.
LowensteinS, 1982, “Remarks” in Legal Services and the Private Bar: 1982 and Beyond (American Bar Association, Chicago, IL) pp 5–6
LSC, 1980Delivery Systems StudyLegal Services Corporation, 733 15th Street, Washington, DC, USA
41.
MartinR, 1980, speech delivered by the Law Centres' Panel at a conference on ‘Legal Services in the 1980s’, University College, Cardiff, 22 March; copy available from P Thomas, Faculty of Law, University College, Cardiff CFI IXL, Wales
42.
Menkel-MeadowC, 1982, “Legal aid in the United States: Professionalisation and politicisation of legal services in the 1980's” paper presented to the Law and Society Meeting, Toronto, June; copy available from C Menkel Meadow, Law School, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
43.
Meredith Report, 1983Legal Aid Cost Comparison: Salaried and Private LawyersCommonwealth Legal Aid Council, Attorney General's Department, Canberra, ACT, Australia
44.
National Consumer Council, 1983Annual Report and Accounts. 1982–1983 (Robendene, Amer sham, Bucks)
45.
Pearson Commission, 1978The Report of the Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury. Volume II: Statistics and Costings Chairman Colin Hargreaves Pearson Baron (PC, Kt, CBD); Cmnd 7054 (HMSO, London)
46.
Quebec Government, 1982, “Évaluation de l'aide judiciaire” research report, Quebec Government, Government House, Quebec, Canada
47.
ReadW, 1981, “Private bar contracts for civil legal services: The advantages and the pitfalls”National Legal Aid Defenders Association Briefcase38(3/4), 93–107
48.
ReifnerU, 1982, “Individualistic and collective legislation: The theory and practice of legal advice in prefascist Germany” in The Politics of Informal Justice Ed. AbelR, (Academic Press, New York) pp 81–124
49.
SaratA, 1981, “Book review of Access to Justice”Harvard Law Review941911
50.
SchyutKGroenendijkC ASlootB, 1977De Weg Naar Het Recht (Deventer, Kiewer)
51.
PollockA Seton, 1975Legal Aid—The First 25 Years (Oyez, London)
52.
SmithKSchulzingerR, 1982, “Materials for involving private attorneys in the delivery of legal services to the poor” research report, Legal Services Corporation, 733 15th Street, Washington, DC, USA
53.
TaylorG D S, 1978, “Special procedures governing small claims in Australia” in Access to Justice: A World Survey, Volume II, Book 1 Eds CappellettiMGarthB, (Sijthoff Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn) pp 595–681
54.
ZanderM, 1978Legal Services for the Community (Maurice Temple Smith, London)
55.
ZemansF H, 1983, “Recent trends in the organisation of legal services” paper presented to the 7th International Congress on Procedural Law, Würzburg, September; copy available from ZemansFProfessor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Downsview, Ontario, Canada
