Intergovernmental ‘Deregulation’: Readings from the First Reagan Years

Abstract

Among the most important changes in federal domestic programs in the United States of America under the first two years of the Reagan Administration has been a reduction in federal regulation of state and local governments. Three strategies of deregulation have been utilized by the Administration: (1) removal of the federal government's possibilities for regulatory involvement by cutting social programs and by devolving program responsibilities to the states; (2) reduction of federal regulations under existing statutes; and (3) relaxation in the enforcement of existing regulations. The study illustrates the three deregulatory strategies by examining their application to the civil-rights and environmental policy arenas. The conclusion presented is that the strategies have so far been successful in reducing regulatory activity in the environmental and civil-rights arenas; however, environmental and civil-rights advocates are mounting a counterattack by turning to Congress and the courts to prevent devolution and other deregulatory actions that weaken enforcement of national laws.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AEI, 1982, “Working paper in governmental regulation” American Enterprise Institute, Center for the Study of Governmental Regulation, 1150 17th Street NW, Washington, DC

Bush Commission, 1982 Reagan Administration Achievements in Regulatory Reform, Presidential Task Force on Regulatory Relief; copy available from the Executive Office Building, The White House, Washington, DC

Congressional Quarterly, 1982, “Congress fights loosening regulation” 4 September issue, pp 2197–2199

Federal Register, 1982a, Volume 47, Number 79, 23 April, pp 17770–17783 (Washington, DC)

Federal Register, 1982b, Volume 47, Number 93, 13 May, pp 20630–20631 (Washington, DC)

FoE, 1982 Ronald Reagan and the American Environment, An Indictment report prepared by Friends of the Earth, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Wilderness Society, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Policy Center, Environmental Action, Defenders of Wildlife, Solar Lobby; copy available from FoE, 124 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

Jubak

, 1982, “EPA starves the states” Environmental Action 13(9) 20–22

LCCR, 1982 Without Justice, A Report on the Conduct of the Justice Department in Civil Rights in 1981–82 Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, 2027 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036

Lipsky

, 1983, “Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs: Precursors of the new federalism” paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, March; copy available from Lipsky

, Department of Sociology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

10.

Lovell

, 1982, “Federal deregulation and state and local governments” m Reductions in US Domestic Spending Ed. Ellwood

J W

, (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 99–129

11.

Lovell

, 1983, “The effects of regulatory changes on states and localities” in The Consequences of Cuts: The Effects of the Reagan Domestic Program on State and Local Governments Eds Nathan

R P

Doolittle

, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 269–286

12.

Mosher

, 1981, “Environmentalists sue to put an end to ‘regulatory massive resistance’” The National Journal 13(6) 256–259

13.

Mosher

, 1982, “Reagan's environmental federalism—are the states up to the challenge” The National Journal 14(5) 184–188

14.

NWF, 1982 The Full Story Behind the EPA Budget Cuts National Wildlife Federation, 1412 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20005

15.

Penoyer

R J

, 1982 Directory of Federal Regulatory Agencies, 1982 Update Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri

16.

Reynolds

W B

, 1981, Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities by the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. House Education and Labor Committee, Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities, Oversight Hearing on Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action, Part I, 23 September, pp 132–156 (US Congress, Washington, DC)

17.

Rowland

C K

Marz

, 1982, “Gresham's law: The regulatory analogy” Policy Studies Review 1 572–580

18.

Stein

, 1982, “Warning from health experts: Federal anti lead drive is running out of gas” The National Journal 5 June issue, p 1005

19.

The Wall Street Journal, 1982, “EPA sets tough hazardous waste rules” 14 July, page 4

20.

The Washington Post, 1981, “Easing our laws might hurt auto makers” 15 November, page A-15

21.

Wilson

L O

, 1981, “Water: Wins and losses” State Government November issue, pp 4–6

22.

Wines

, 1982, “Administration says it merely seeks a ‘better way’ to enforce civil rights” The National Journal 14(12) 536–541