Traditionally the rules to be used when evaluating the efficiency gains from (public sector) projects are derived from models in which there are no natural resources. If the use of a certain natural resource is discussed the implicit assumption seems to be that the traditional project evaluation rules are applicable. In this paper it is shown that the traditional cost-benefit rules are misleading if the economy is making use of exhaustible or renewable resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoadwayR, 1975, “Cost-benefit rules in general equilibrium”Review of Economic Studies42361–373
2.
BohmP, 1974Social Efficiency: A Concise Introduction (Macmillan, London)
3.
DasguptaP SHealG M, 1979Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources (James Nisbeth, Welwyn, Herts; and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
HerfindahlO CKneeseA, 1974Economic Theory of Natural Resources (Charles Merrill, Columbus, OH)
5.
HoelM, 1977, “Five essays on the extraction of an exhaustible resource which has a non-exhaustible substitute” memorandum, Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo
6.
HotellingH, 1931, “The economics of exhaustible resources”Journal of Political Economy39137–175
7.
JohanssonP-O, 1982, “Cost-benefit rules in general disequilibrium”Journal of Public Economics18121–137
8.
LesourneJ, 1975Cost-Benefit Analysis and Economic Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
9.
LöfgrenK G, 1981, “Forest economics and the economics of natural resources” mimeograph, Department of Forest Economics, The Royal College of Forestry, Umeå, Sweden
10.
MalerKG, 1974Environmental Economics. A Theoretical Inquiry (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
11.
PuuT, 1977, “On the profitability of exhausting natural resources”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management4185–199
12.
SilberbergE, 1972, “Duality and the many consumer's surpluses”The American Economic Review62942–952
13.
SydsaeterK, 1973Matematisk Analyse. Bind II (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo)
