BafnaS, 2003, “Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques”Environment and Behavior3517–29
2.
DaltonConroy R, 2003, “The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection an angularity”Environment and Behavior35107–131
3.
DaltonConroy R, 2005, “Space syntax and spatial cognition”, in World Architecture: Space Syntax Monograph Ed. WuD11(185) 41–45
4.
HaqSZimringC, 2003, “Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts”Environment and Behavior35132–160
5.
HillierB, 2003, “The architectures of seeing and going: Or, are cities shaped by bodies or minds? And is there a syntax of spatial cognition?”, in Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium 17–19 June, London, http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1059/1/Hillier-2003-seeinggoing.pdf
6.
HillierB, 2012, “Studying cities to learn about minds: Some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3912–32
7.
HillierBHansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
8.
HölscherCBrösamleMVrachliotisG, 2012, “Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3963–82
9.
KimY OPennA, 2004, “Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment”Environment and Behavior36483–504
10.
MavridouM, 2012, “Perception of three-dimensional urban scale in an immersive virtual environment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3933–47
11.
MeilingerTFranzGBülthoffH H, 2012, “From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: First steps toward closing the causal chain”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3948–62
12.
PeponisJZimringCChoiY K, 1990, “Finding the building in wayfinding”Environment and Behavior22555–590
13.
WienerJ MFranzG, 2005, “Isovists as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior”, in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligencenumber 3343 (Springer, Berlin) pp 42–57
