In this paper we present a method to analyse data from observed population statistics in order to create a stylised location typology based on household profiles (microgeographic level). The household profiles are used to inform the development of rules for an agent-based model of residential population mobility. The method is demonstrated with the 2001 Population Census data for East Anglia, UK. Household profiles are derived from a principal components analysis to reduce dimensionality in the census data combined with a cluster analysis to aggregate the observations. We test whether a range of household archetypes that link specific locations to specific profiles can be identified simultaneously at both mesogeographic and macrogeographic levels. Results reaffirm conventional archetypes: Single people concentrate in city centres, families mainly locate in the suburbs and periurban areas, and retirees are more prevalent in the suburbs and close to the coast. Surprisingly, however, there is a clear distinction between locations with cohabiting couples (located at the fringe of the periurban areas) and locations with married couples (located in the countryside). The observed spatial distributions reveal different location choices between different household profiles. Identification of these household profiles supports the development of residential mobility models that may be used to explore regional and local planning issues with respect to future population projections and environmental change.
AkkermanA, 2006, “Housing as a heuristic condition in the simultaneous projection of population and households”Environment and Planning A38765–790
2.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Landuse (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
3.
AnderssonCLindgrenKRasmussenSWhiteR, 2002, “Urban growth simulation from two first principles”Physical Review E66(2) 026204(1)–026204(9)
4.
AndrewsG JKearnsR A, 2005, “Everyday health histories and the making of place: The case of an English coastal town”Social Science and Medicine602697–2713
5.
AustinM EMitchellF L, 1975, “A model for the determination of residential preferences”Computers and Urban Society1207–215
6.
AxelrodR, 1997The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
7.
BarredoJ IKasandoMMcCormickNLavalleC, 2003, “Modelling dynamic spatial processes: Simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata”Landscape and Urban Planning64145–160
8.
BattyM, 2005Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-based Models and Fractals (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
BoschmaR A, 2004, “Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective”Regional Studies381001–1014
10.
BousquetFLe PageC, 2004, “Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review”Ecological Modelling176313–332
11.
BrownD GPageS ERioloRRandW, 2004, “Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts”Environmental Modelling and Software191097–1109
12.
BrownD GRobinsonD TAnLNassauerJ IZellnerMRandWRioloRPageS ELowBWangZ F, 2008, “Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system”Geoforum39805–818
13.
CarusoGRounsevellM D ACojocaruG, 2005, “Exploring a spatio-dynamic neighbourhood-based model of residential behaviour in the Brussels periurban area”International Journal of Geographical Information Science19103–123
14.
CarusoGPeetersDCavailhesJRounsevellM, 2007, “Spatial configurations in a periurban city: A cellular automata-based microeconomic model”Regional Science and Urban Economics37542–567
15.
CavailhesJPeetersDSekerisEThisseJ-F, 2004, “The periurban city: Why to live between the suburbs and the countryside”Regional Science and Urban Economics34681–703
16.
ChapinF S JWeissS F, (Eds), 1962Urban Growth Dynamics in a Regional Cluster of Cities (John Wiley, London)
17.
ChoocharukulKVanH TFujiiS, 2008, “Psychological effects of travel behavior on preference of residential location choice”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice42116–124
18.
CiveroloKHogrefeCLynnBRosenthalJKuJ YSoleckiWCoxJSmallCRosenzweigCGoldbergRKnowltonKKinneyP, 2007, “Estimating the effects of increased urbanization on surface meteorology and ozone concentrations in the New York city metropolitan region”Atmospheric Environment411803–1818
19.
CrooksA TCastleC J EBattyM, 2008, “Key challenges in agent-based modelling for geo-spatial simulation”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems32417–430
20.
DökmeciVBerkozL, 2000, “Residential-location preferences according to demographic characteristics in Istanbul”Landscape and Urban Planning4845–55
21.
DujardinCSelodHThomasI, 2008, “Residential segregation and unemployment: The case of Brussels”Urban Studies4589–113
22.
EpsteinJ MAxtellR, 1996Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
FontaineC MRounsevellM D A, 2009, “An agent-based approach to model future residential pressure on a regional landscape”Landscape Ecology241237–1254
FujitaMThisseJ-F, 2003Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
26.
GilbertN, 2007Agent-based Models (Sage, London)
27.
GilbertNBankesS, 2002, “Platforms and methods for agent-based modelling”Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America997197–7198
28.
GrublerAO'NeillBRiahiKChirkovVGoujonAKolpPPrommerIScherbovSSlentoeE, 2007, “Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES”Technological Forecasting and Social Change74980–1029
29.
HolmanI PNichollsRBerryPHarrisonPAudsleyEShackleySRounsevellM D A, 2005a, “A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK: II results”Climatic Change7143–73
30.
HolmanI PRounsevellM D AShackleySHarrisonPNichollsRBerryPAudsleyE, 2005b, “A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the UK: I methodology”Climatic Change719–41
31.
HolmanI PRounsevellM D ACojacaruGShackleySMcLachlanCAudsleyEBerryP MFontaineC MHarrisonP AHenriquesCMokrechMNichollsR JPearnK RRichardsJ A, 2008“The concepts and development of a participatory regional integrated assessment tool”Climatic Change905–30
32.
JagerWJanssenMDe VriesHDe GreefJVlekC, 2000, “Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological–economical model”Ecological Economics35357–379
33.
KnoxPPinchS, 2010Urban Social Geography: An Introduction6th Edition (Pearson Education, New York)
34.
Le BourdaisC, 2004, “Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage?”Journal of Marriage and Family66929–942
35.
LindbergEHartigTGarvillJGarlingT, 1992, “Residential-location preferences across the lifespan”Journal of Environmental Psychology12187–198
36.
LutzWSandersonWScherbovS, 2008, “The coming acceleration of global population ageing”Nature451716–719
37.
MackiewiczARatajczakW, 1993, “Principal components-analysis (PCA)”Computers and Geosciences19303–342
38.
MatthewsR B, 2006, “The people and landscape model (PALM): Towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models”Ecological Modelling194329–343
39.
MatthewsR BGilbertN GRoachAPolhillJ GGottsN M, 2007, “Agent-based land-use models: A review of applications”Landscape Ecology221447–1459
40.
MokrechMNichollsR JRichardsJ AHenriquesCHolmanI PShackleyS, 2008, “Regional impact assessment of flooding under future climate and socio-economic scenarios for East Anglia and North West England”Climatic Change9031–55
41.
MokrechMHansonSNichollsR JWolfJWalkdenM J AFontaineC MNicholson-ColeSJudeS RLeakeJStansbyP KWatkinsonA RRounsevellM D ALoweJ AHallJ W, 2009, “The Tyndall coastal simulator”Journal of Coastal Conservation: Planning and Management15325–335
42.
MonticinoMAcevedoMCallicottBCogdillTLindquistC, 2007, “Coupled human and natural systems: A multi-agent-based approach”Environmental Modelling and Software22656–663
43.
NgC F, 2008, “Commuting distances in a household location choice model with amenities”Journal of Urban Economics63116–129
44.
NichollsRHansonSMokrechMStansbyPChiniNWalkdenMDawsonRRocheNHallJNicholson-ColeSWatkinsonAJudeSLoweJWolfJLeakeJRounsevellMFontaineCAcosta-MichlikL, 2009, “The Tyndall Coastal Simulator and Interface”, in Coastal Engineering 2008 Ed. SmithJ, (World Scientific, Singapore) pp 4341–4353
45.
NijkampPVan WissenLRimaA, 1993, “A household life-cycle model for residential relocation behaviour”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences2735–53
46.
ONS, 2005, “Region in figures, East of England”, technical report, Office for National Statistics, Newport, South Wales
47.
O'SullivanD, 2005, “Geographical information science: Time changes everything”Progress in Human Geography29749–756
48.
OwenSMacKenzieABunceRStewartHDonovanRStarkGHewittC, 2006, “Urban land classification and its uncertainties using principal component and cluster analyses: A case study for the UK west midlands”Landscape and Urban Planning78311–321
49.
ParkerD CMansonS MJanssenM AHoffmannM JDeadmanP, 2003, “Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93314–337
50.
PhanDAmblardF, 2007, Agent-based Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences (The Bardwell Press, Oxford)
51.
ReginsterIRounsevellM D A, 2006, “Scenarios of future urban landuse in Europe”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33619–636
52.
RichardsJ AMokrechMBerryP MNichollsR J, 2008, “Regional assessment of climate change impacts on coastal and fluvial ecosystems and the scope for adaptation”Climatic Change90141–167
53.
RossiP H, 1955Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility (The Free Press, Glencoe, IL)
54.
RounsevellM D AReginsterIAraujoMCarterTDendonckerNEwertFHouseJKankaanpaaSLeemansRMetzgerMSchmitCSmithPTuckG, 2006, “A coherent set of future landuse change scenarios for Europe”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment11457–68
55.
RounsevellM D ARobinsonDMurray-RustD, 2012, “From actors to agents in socio-ecological systems models”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B367259–269
56.
SandersL, 2007, “Agent models in urban geography”, in Agent-based Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences Eds PhanDAmblardF, (The Bardwell Press, Oxford) pp 147–167
57.
TorrensP M, 2001, “Can Geocomputation save urban simulation? Throw some agents into the mixture, simmer, and wait” WP32, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, https://www.bartlett@ucl.ac.uk/casa/pdf/paper32.pdf
58.
TranmerMSteelD G, 1998, “Using census data to investigate the causes of the ecological fallacy”Environment and Planning A30817–831
59.
TurnerM A, 2005, “Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development”Journal of Urban Economics5719–54
60.
WalkerJ LLiJ P, 2007, “Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions”Journal of Geographical Systems977–101
61.
YinLMullerB, 2007, “Residential location and the biophysical environment: Exurban development agents in a heterogeneous landscape”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34279–295
62.
ZegrasP CSrinivasanS, 2007, “Household income, travel behavior, location, and accessibility—sketches from two different developing contexts”Transportation Research Recordnumber 2038, 128–138
