In this paper we describe the evolution of the urban grids of five case studies from the urban fringe of the Oporto Metropolitan Area throughout the last fifty years. We use a cartographic redrawing technique to recreate their street networks at four different historical moments and space syntax to explore their configurational evolution. Besides the confirmation of space syntax as a particularly relevant tool for the analysis and planning of peripheral urban areas, the study clarifies the configurational differences between rural and urban grids, provides evidence of different suburban growth patterns, and demonstrates strong relationships between such patterns and the evolution of the system's syntactic intelligibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorsdorfA, 2004, “On the way to post-suburbia? Changing structures on the outskirt of European cities”, in European Cities—Insights on Outskirts—Structures Eds BorsdorfAZembriP (METL/PUCA, Paris) pp 7–30
2.
ConzenM, 1960Alnwick Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan Analysis (The Institute of British Geographers, London)
3.
DaltonRDaltonN, 2005, “A spatial signature of sprawl: or the proportion and distribution of linear network circuits”, paper presented at Geocomputation 2005, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; http://eprints.ucl.ac.Uk/1106/1/SSS.pdf.pdf
4.
DominguesA, 2008, “Extensive urbanization: a new scale for planning”, in Proceedings of CITTA 1st Annual Conference on Planning Research—Evaluation in Planning Eds PinhoPOliveiraV (FEUP Edições, Porto) pp 129–151
5.
FontACarracedoOVecslirL, 2004a, “Metropolitan configurations: spatial structures and types of urban growth”, in The Explosion of the City Ed. FontA (COAC Publications, Barcelona) pp 328–333
6.
FontAVecslirLCarracedoO, 2004b, “Contemporary metropolitan morphologies: morphological territories”, in The Explosion of the City Ed. FontA (COAC Publications, Barcelona) pp 334–343
7.
GospodiniA, 2006, “Portraying, classifying and understanding the emerging landscapes in the post-industrial city”Cities23311–330
8.
HillierB, 1996Space is the Machine (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
HillierB, 2001, “A theory of the city as object: or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space”, paper presented at the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta; http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1029/
11.
HillierBHansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
12.
HillierBIidaS, 2005, “Network effects and psychological effects: a theory or urban movement”, in Proceedings of the Spatial Information Theory: International Conference COSIT, Ellicottsville, NY, USA; http://www.eprints.ucl.ac.uk/118367/
13.
HillierBVaughanL, 2007, “The city as one thing”Progress in Planning67205–230
14.
HillierBBurdettRPeponisJPennA, 1987, “Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything?”Architecture and Behaviour3233–250
15.
IndovinaF, 2004, “The metropolization of the territory: new territorial hierarchies”, in The Explosion of the City Ed. FontA (COAC Publications, Barcelona) pp 20–47
16.
JohnsonJ, 1974, “Geographical processes at the edge of the city”, in Suburban Growth Ed. JohnsonJ (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
17.
LevyA, 1999, “Urban morphology and the problem of the modern urban fabric: some questions for research”Urban Morphology379–85
18.
LouisH, 1936, “Die geographische Gliederung von Gross-Berlin”, in Länderkundliche Forschung: Krebs-Festschrift Eds LouisHPanzerW (Engelhorn, Stuttgart) pp 146–171
19.
MarshallS, 2005Streets and Patterns (Spon, London)
20.
MoudonA, 1997, “Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field”Urban Morphology13–10
21.
MoudonA, 1998, “The changing morphology of suburban neighborhoods”, in Typological Processes and Design Theory Ed. PetruccioliA (Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge, MA) pp 141–157
22.
NogueiraA, 2003, “Analysis of high sub-centrality of peripheral areas at the global urban context”, paper presented at the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft; http://www.spacesyntax.tudelft.nl/
23.
PennA, 2001, “Space syntax and spatial cognition: or, why the axial line?”, paper presented at the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta; http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/3419/
24.
PennAHillierBBannisterDXuJ, 1998, “Configurational modelling of urban movement networks”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2559–84
25.
PinhoPOliveiraV, 2009, “Cartographic analysis in urban morphology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36107–127
26.
PortasNSáMDominguesASilvaL, 2004, “The Porto urban region”, in The Explosion of the City Ed. FontA (COAC Publications, Barcelona) pp 84–100
27.
SheerB, 2004, “The radial street as a timeline: a study of the transformation of elastic tissues”, in Suburban Form: An International Perspective Eds StanilovKSheerB (Routledge, London) pp 102–122
28.
StanilovK, 2002, “Post-war trends, land-cover changes and patterns of suburban development: the case of Greater Seattle”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29173–195
29.
StanilovK, 2004, “Postwar growth and suburban development patterns”, in Suburban Form: An International Perspective Eds StanilovKSheerB (Routledge, London) pp 1–12
30.
TatomJ, 2004, “Making a metropolitan landscape: Lyons 1812–1994”, in Suburban Form: An International Perspective Eds StanilovKSheerB (Routledge, London) pp 77–101
31.
TokerUBaranPMullM, 2005, “(Sub)Urban evolution: a cross-temporal analysis of spatial configuration in an American town (1989–2002)”, paper presented at the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft; http://www.spacesyntax.tudelft.nl/
32.
VaughanLJonesKGriffithsSHacklayM, 2009, “The spatial signature of suburban ‘active’ centres”, paper presented at the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm; http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/15021/
33.
WhitehandJ, 1974, “The changing nature of the urban fringe: a time perspective”, in Suburban Form: An International Perspective Eds StanilovKSheerB (Routledge, London) pp 31–52
34.
WhitehandJ, 1992, “Recent advances in urban morphology”Urban Studies29619–636
35.
WhitehandJ, 2001, “British urban morphology: the Conzenian tradition”Urban Morphology5103–109
