The research in this paper addresses human — environment interactions in Canadian cities by examining the spatial distribution of vegetation in relation to various socioeconomic indicators. Specifically, intercity and intracity comparisons are evaluated using correlation analysis and geographically weighted regression (GWR). Vegetation abundance estimates derived from spectral mixture analysis of Landsat imagery are compared with Canadian census data for the cities of Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver to quantify vegetation-related environmental equity in Canada's largest urban centres. Results exhibit strong and consistent correlations between median family income and vegetation fraction for Montreal (r = 0.473), Toronto (r = 0.467), and Vancouver (r = 0.456). Furthermore, examining the GWR results suggests that employing an adaptive bandwidth kernel technique with a manual selection of ten neighbours for each observation provides a greater range and higher median values for local regression estimates (Montreal: 0.69; Toronto: 0.74; Vancouver: 0.73) as compared with the Akaike information criterion-selection method. Finally, we discuss the potential application of the presented analysis techniques for urban planning and community-development initiatives, specifically associated with managing vegetation-related environmental equity at various scales. Possible applications of these techniques for urban planning purposes are discussed, and key methodological considerations for performing such an analysis are highlighted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndertonD LAndersonA BOakesJ MFraserM R, 1994, “Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping”Demography31229–248
2.
BarlowMMayE, 2000Frederick Street: Life and Death on Canada's Love Canal (HarperCollins, Toronto)
3.
BowenW MSailingM JHaynesK ECyranE J, 1995, “Towards environmental justice: spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland”Annals of the Association of American Geographers85641–663
4.
BrulleR JPellowD N, 2006, “Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities”Annals Review of Public Health27103–124
5.
BrunsdonCFotheringhamA SCharltonM, 2002, “Geographically weighted summary statistics—a framework for localised exploratory data”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems26501–524
BuzelliMJerrettMBurnettRFinklesteinN, 2003, “Spatiotemporal perspectives on air pollution and environmental justice in Hamilton, Canada”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93557–573
8.
CoenS ERossN A, 2006, “Exploring the material basis for health: characteristics of parks in Montreal neighbourhoods with contrasting health outcomes”Health and Place12361–371
9.
ComberABrunsdonCGreenE, 2008, “Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups”Landscape and Urban Planning86103–114
10.
CutterSHolmDClarkL, 1996. “The role of geographic scale in monitoring environmental justice”Risk Analysis16517–526
11.
FaberD J, 1998The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States (Guilford Press, New York)
12.
FotheringhamA SBrunsdonCCharltonM E, 2002Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
13.
GetisA, 2007, “Reflections on spatial autocorrelation”Regional Science and Urban Economics37491–496
14.
GoodwinNCoopsNStoneC, 2005, “Assessing plantation canopy condition from airborne imagery using spectral mixture analysis and fractional abundances”International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation711–28
15.
GroveJ LCadenassoMBurghW RPickettS T AShwarzKO'Neill-DunneJWilsonMTroyABooneC, 2006, “Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighbourhoods in Baltimore, Maryland”Society and Natural Resources19117–136
16.
HolifieldR, 2001, “Defining environmental justice and environmental racism”Urban Geography2278–90
17.
HutchinsonC FToledanoJ, 1993, “Guidelines for demonstrating geographical information systems based on participatory development”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems7453–461
18.
JensenRGatrellJBoultonJHarperB, 2004, “Using remote sensing and geographic information systems to study urban quality of life and urban forest amenities”, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art5
19.
JerrettMEylesJColeDReaderS, 1997, “Environmental equity in Canada: an empirical investigation into the income distribution of pollution in Ontario”Environment and Planning A291777–1800
20.
JerrettMBurnettR TKanaroglouPEylesJFinkelsteinNGiovisC, 2001, “A GIS—environmental justice analysis of particular air pollution in Hamilton, Canada”Environment and Planning A33955–973
21.
KuoF ESullivanW C, 2001, “Environment and crime in the inner city”Environment and Behavior33343–365
22.
LafaryE WGatrellJ DJensenR R, 2008, “People, pixels, and weights in Vanderburgh County, Indiana: toward a new urban geography of human — environment interactions”Geocarto International2353–66
23.
LiGWengQ, 2007, “Measuring quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integrating remote sensing and census data”International Journal of Remote Sensing28249–267
24.
LoC PFaberB J, 197, “Integration of Landsat Thematic Mapper and census data for quality of life assessment”Remote Sensing of Environment62143–157
25.
MaantayJ, 2002, “Mapping environmental injustices: pitfalls and potential of geographic information systems in assessing environmental health and equity”Environmental Health Perspectives110161–171
26.
MennisJ, 2006a, “Socioeconomic — vegetation relationships in urban, residential land: the case of Denver, Colorado”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing72911–921
27.
MennisJ, 2006b, “Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression”The Cartographic Journal43171–179
28.
MennisJ LJordonL, 2005, “The distribution of environmental equity: exploring spatial nonstationarity in multivariate models of air toxic releases”Annals of the Association of American Geographers95249–268
29.
Ogneva-HimmelbergerYPearsallHRakshitR, 2009, “Concrete evidence and geographically weighted regression: a regional analysis of wealth and the land cover in Massachusetts”Applied Geography29478–487
30.
OpenshawS, 1991, “Developing spatial analysis methods for GIS”, in Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications Eds MaguireDGoodchildMRhindD (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 389–402
31.
OstfieldR SGlassG EKeesingF, 2005, “Spatial epidemiology an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline”TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution6328–336
32.
OuaidrariHVermoteE F, 1999, “Operational atmospheric correction of Landsat TM Data”Remote Sensing of Environment704–15
33.
PhinnSStanfordMScarthPMurrayA TShyyP T, 2002, “Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques”International Journal of Remote Sensing234131–4153
34.
PowellR LRobertsD ADennisonP EHessL L, 2007, “Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil”Remote Sensing of Environment106253–267
35.
RashedTWeeksJ RGadallaM SHillA G, 2001, “Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multispectral satellite imagery: a case study of the greater Cairo region, Egypt”Geocarto International16(4) 7–17
36.
RiddM K, 1995, “Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystems analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities”International Journal of Remote Sensing162165–2185
37.
SmallC, 2001, “Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis”International Journal of Remote Sensing221305–1334
38.
SmallCLuJ W T, 2006, “Estimation and vicarious validation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis”Remote Sensing of Environment100441–456
39.
SuJ GLarsonTGouldTCohenMBuzzelliM, 2009, “Transboundary air pollution and environmental justice: Vancouver and Seattle compared”GeoJournal doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9269-6
40.
TaylorA FWileyAKuoF ESullivanW C, 1998, “Green spaces as places to grow”Environment and Behavior303–28
41.
TookeT RCoopsN CGoodwinN RVoogtJ A, 2009, “Extracting urban vegetation characteristics using spectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifications”Remote Sensing of Environment113398–407
42.
UCC, 1987, “Toxic wastes in the United States: a national report on the racial and socio-economic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites”, United Church of Christ, Commission for Racial Justice, http://www.ucc.org/about-us/archives/pdfs/toxwrace87.pdf
43.
USGAO, 1983, “Siting of hazardous waste landfills and their correlation with racial and economic status surrounding communities”, United States General Accounting Office, http://www.goa.gov/products/RCED-83-168
