Fractal analysis offers potential as a tool for evaluating the visual qualities of street vistas. In this paper we outline the concept of fractal dimension as a measure of texture in images of built form and describe a methodology for comparing fractal dimension with perceptions of visual quality in street vistas. We find that a positive relationship exists between levels of fractal dimension and judgments of visual quality in street vistas and outline the applications that this relationship may have.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkksDSprottJ, 1996, “Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns”Journal of the Empirical Studies of the Arts41–16
2.
AppleyardD, 1976Planning a Pluralist City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
3.
BentleyIAlcockAMurrainPMcGlynnSSmithG, 1985Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers (Architectural Press, Oxford)
4.
BovillC, 1996Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA)
CooperJ, 2000The Potential of Chaos and Fractal Analysis in Urban Design PhD thesis, Joint Centre for Urban Design, Oxford Books University
7.
CooperJOskrochiR, 2008, “Fractal analysis of street vistas: a potential tool for assessing levels of visual variety in everyday street scenes”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35349–363
CuttingJGarvinJ, 1987, “Fractal curves and complexity”Perception and Psychophysics42365–370
10.
DanielTViningJ, 1983, “Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality”, in Human Behaviour and the Natural Environment Eds AltmanIWahlwillJ (Plenum Press, New York) pp 39–84
11.
DenscombeM, 2003The Good Research Guide: For Small Scale Social Research Projects2nd edition (Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berks)
12.
EysenckMKeaneM, 2000Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook4th edition (Psychology Press, Hove, E Sussex)
13.
FisherJBellPBaumA, 1984Environmental Psychology2nd edition (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)
HagerhallCPurcellTTaylorR, 2004, “Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference”Journal of Environmental Psychology24247–255
18.
HershbergerR, 1969, “A study of meaning and architecture”, in Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications Ed. NasarJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 175–194
19.
HerzogT, 1985, “A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes”Journal of Environmental Psychology5225–241
20.
HerzogT, 1987, “A cognitive analysis of preference for natural environments: mountains, canyons, and deserts”Landscape Journal6140–152
21.
JacobsJ, 1961The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, New York)
22.
KaplanS, 1987, “Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective”Environment and Behaviour193–32
23.
KaplanSKaplanR, 1982Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World (Praeger, New York)
24.
KaplanSKaplanR, 1989The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, New York)
25.
KaplanSKaplanRWendtJ, 1972, “Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material”Perception and Psychophysics12354–356
26.
KochH, 1993, “The concept of fractals in the pharmaceutical sciences”Pharmazie9643–657
27.
LawsonB, 2001The Language of Space (Architectural Press, Oxford)
28.
MandelbrotB, 1982The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA)
29.
MarchakF, 1987Fractal Models in Visual Perception of Textures and Surface in Nature (Dartmouth, Hanover, NH)
30.
MarrD, 1982Vision (W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA)
31.
OsgoodCSuciGTannenbaumP, 1957The Measurement of Meaning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
PorteousJ, 1977Environment and Behaviour: Planning and Everyday Urban Life (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
35.
PunterJ, 1990, “The 10 commandments of architecture and urban design”The Planner76(39) 10–13
36.
PurcellALambR, 1984, “Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area”Journal of Environmental Management1931–63
37.
RichardsR, 2001, “A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: chaos theory, the beauty of nature and our broader humanistic view”Journal of Humanistic Psychology41(2) 59–95
38.
RudermanD, 1997, “Origins of scaling in natural images”Vision Research373385–3398
39.
RudermanDBialekW, 1994, “Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods”Physical Review Letters73814–818
40.
SatoTMatsuokaMTakayasuH, 1996, “Fractal image analysis of natural scenes and medical images”Fractals4463–468
41.
SpeharBCliffordCNewellBTaylorR, 2003, “Universal aesthetics of fractals”Computers and Graphics27813–820
42.
StampsA, 2002, “Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty”Landscape and Urban Planning60163–184
43.
StrattonPHayesN, 1999A Student's Dictionary of Psychology3rd edition (Arnold, London)
44.
TaylorR, 2001, “Architects reach for the clouds: how fractals may figure in our appreciation of a proposed new building”Nature41018
45.
TaylorRNewellBSpeharBCliffordC, 2001, “Fractals: a resonance between art and nature?”Symmetry: Art and Science1194–197
