This paper presents a qualitative study of perception of scale. The study took place in an immersive virtual environment. The participants were asked to navigate in six virtual urban environments which had the same configuration but different properties of scale or proportion. The participants had to fill in a questionnaire of which the analysis is presented in this paper. Through this study a main hypothesis for the perception of scale has been created. This is that the perception of form affects the perception of both geometrical and topological properties of space. A new definition of scale is introduced which is the relation of form to space. This study also brings up the issue of the dualism of form and space in the existing literature and how this dualism can be overcome with the study of scale.
DaltonConroy R, 2001Spatial Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments PhD dissertation, Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London
2.
FortyA, 2000Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture (Thames and Hudson, London)
3.
HillierB, 1996Space is the Machine (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
HillierBHansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
5.
HillierBPennAHansonJGrajewskiTXuJ, 1993, “Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2029–66
6.
KrampenM, 1979Meaning in the Urban Environment (Pion, London)
7.
Le Corbusier, 1948The Modulor (Faber and Faber, London)
8.
Le Corbusier, 1958The Modulor 2, Let the User Speak Next (Faber and Faber, London)
9.
LickliderH, 1965Architectural Scale (The Architectural Press, London)
10.
MansfieldB, 2005, “Beyond rescaling: Reintegrating the ‘national’ as a dimension of scalar relations”Progress in Human Geography29458–473
11.
MarchL, 1998Architectonics of Humanism (Academy Editions, London)
12.
MikitenT MSalingarosA NHing-SingY, 2000, “Pavements as embodiments of meaning for a fractal mind”Nexus Network Journal261–72
13.
MolesA, 1966Information Theory and Esthetic Perception (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL)
14.
MontelloD R, 1993, “Scale and multiple psychologies of space”, in Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS Eds FrankA UCampariI (Springer, Berlin) pp 312–321
15.
MooreCAllenG, 1976Dimensions: Space, Shape and Scale in Architecture (Architectural Record, New York)
16.
MumfordL, 1961The City in History (Secker and Warburg, London)
17.
OrrF, 1985Scale in Architecture (Van Nastrand Reinhold, New York)
18.
PaasiA, 2004, “Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale”Progress in Human Geography28536–546
19.
PadovanR, 1999Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture (Routledge, New York)
20.
PlatoD J, 2000Timaeus translated by ZeylD J (Hackett, Indianapolis, IN)
21.
PortugaliJ, 2004, “Toward a cognitive approach to urban dynamics”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31589–613
22.
SayreN F, 2005, “Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration”Progress in Human Geographies29276–290
23.
TateN JAtkinsonP M (Eds), 2001Modelling Scale in Geographical Information Systems (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
24.
TellerJ, 2003, “A spherical metric for the field-oriented analysis of complex urban open spaces”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30339–356
25.
TurnerADoxaMO'SullivanDPennA, 2001, “From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28103–121
26.
Van der LaanD, 1983Architectonic Space (EJ Brill, Leiden)
27.
VenturiRBrownScott DIzenourS, 1977Learning from Las Vegas (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
28.
WeberR, 1995On the Aesthetics of Architecture: A Psychological Approach to the Structure of Perceived Architectural Space (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
29.
WeberRAmannM (Eds), 2004Proceedings of the Dresden International Symposium of Architecture: Aesthetics and Architectural Composition Lehrstuhl Raumgestaltung, 16–19 June, Technical University Dresden (pro literatur Verlag, Augsburg)
30.
WhitehandJ W R, 1992Urban Landscapes: International Perspectives (Routledge, London)
31.
WillemsenPGoochA A, 2002, “Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual RealityOrlando, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conferences.jsp
32.
WitmerG BKlineB P, 1998, “Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments”Presence7(2) 144–167
33.
WittkowerR, 1949Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism (Alec Tiranti, London)
34.
ZeviB, 1978The Modern Language of Architecture (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
