As a contribution to the wider theoretical discussion on quality assurance in team production, this case study describes, using the capital–output ratio as a measure of efficiency performance, the quality control problems of Chinese construction state-owned enterprises and explains, with reference to relevant scholarly opinions, why the outcome of legislative requirements for experts falls short of expectations in terms of neo-institutional economic reasoning. This is so, even though the law apparently addresses the principal-agent problem in teamwork by strengthening monitoring.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlchianA ADemsetzH, 1972, “Production, information costs, and economic organization”The American Economic Review62777–795
2.
AronD J, 1990, “Firm organization and the economic approach to personnel management”The American Economic Review80(2) 23–27
3.
BaiC-ELiD DWangY, 1997, “Enterprise productivity and efficiency: When is up really down?”Journal of Comparative Economics24265–280
4.
BaiC-ELiD DTaoZWangY, 2001, “A multi-task theory of the state enterprise reform”, WP 367, School of Economics and Finance, The University of Hong Kong
5.
BozemanB, 1987All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
6.
ChangT-C, 2004, “Growth, corruption and state capacity? China in comparative perspective”, paper prepared for presentation to the Mini-APSA, Department of Political Science, Columbia University
7.
ChauK WWalkerA, 1988, “The measurement of total factor productivity of the Hong Kong construction industry”Construction Management and Economics6209–224
8.
CheJQianY, 1998a, “Institutional environment, community government, and corporate governance: Understanding China's township-village enterprises”The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization141–23
9.
CheJQianY, 1998b, “Insecure property rights and government ownership of firms”The Quarterly Journal of Economics113467–496
10.
CheungS N S, 1974, “A theory of price control”Journal of Law and Economics1753–71
11.
CheungS N S, 1982Will China Go Capitalist?Institute of Economic Affairs, London
12.
CoaseR, 1937, “The nature of the firm”Economica4386–405
13.
CoaseR, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics41–44
14.
GrossmanSHartO, 1986, “The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration”The Journal of Political Economy94691–719
15.
GuE X, 2001, “Beyond the property rights approach: Welfare policy and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China”Development and Change32129–150
16.
HsiaoCNugentJPerrigneIQiuJ, 1998, “Shares versus residual claimant contracts: The case of Chinese TVEs”Journal of Comparative Economics26317–337
17.
HuX, 2000, “The state, enterprises, and society in post-Deng China”Asian Survey40641–657
18.
HuangY, 2002, “Managing Chinese bureaucrats: An institutional economics perspective”Political Studies5061–79
19.
JeffersonG H, 1998, “China's state enterprises: Public goods, externalities, and Coase”The American Economic Review88428–432
20.
JensenM CMecklingW H, 1976, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”Journal of Financial Economics3305–360
21.
LaiL W C, 1998, “The leasehold system as a means of planning by contract: The case of Hong Kong”Town Planning Review69249–275
22.
LaiL W C, 2000, “The Coasian market–firm dichotomy and subcontracting in the construction industry”Construction Management and Economics18355–362
23.
LaiL W C, 2005, “Planning by contract: The leasehold foundation of a comprehensively planned capitalist land market”Economic Affairs2516–18
24.
LaiL W C, 2007, “‘The problem of social cost’. The Coase theorem and externalities explained: Using simple diagrams and examples to illustrate the role of land use planning in tackling externalities”Town Planning Review78335–368
25.
LaiL W CHungC W Y, 2008, “The inner logic of the Coase theorem and a Coasian planning research agenda”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35207–226
26.
LaiL W CYungPHoE C K, 2007, “Time is of the essence: The idea of the corollary of the Coase theorem and a possible application”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies19224–232
27.
LaiL W CNgF W NYungP, 2008a, “The Coase theorem and a Coasian construction economics and management research agenda”Construction Management and Economics2629–46
28.
LaiL W CWongS KHoE C KChauK W, 2008b, “Time is of the essence? An empirical application of the corollary of the Coase theorem”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies2034–51
29.
LiD DWuC, 2002, “The ownership school vs the management school of state enterprise reform: Evidence from China”, William Davidson WP 435, Hang Leung Center for Organization Research, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
30.
LiSLiSZhangW, 1998, “Competition and institutional change: Privatization in China”, WP 117, Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong
31.
LinJ YCaiFLiZ, 1998, “Competition, policy burdens and state-owned enterprise reform”The American Economic Review88422–427
32.
LinYLiXPitneyH, 1989, “The tort system in China”Law and Contemporary Problems52143–167
33.
MeijerFVisscherH, 1998, “The deregulation of building controls: A comparison of Dutch and other European systems”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25617–629
34.
MeijerFVisscherH, 2006, “Deregulation and privatization of European building-control systems?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33491–501
35.
MengistaeTXuL C, 2004, “Agency theory and executive compensation: The case of Chinese state-owned enterprises”Journal of Labor Economics22615–637
36.
NaginD SRebitzerJ BSandersSTaylorL J, 2002, “Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment”The American Economic Review92850–873
37.
OiJ C, 1992, “Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China”World Politics4599–126
38.
ParkerDKirkpatrickC, 2005, “Privatisation in development countries: A review of the evidence and the policy lessons”The Journal of Development Studies41513–541
39.
ShirleyM MXuL C, 1998, “Information, incentives, and commitment: An empirical analysis of contracts between government and the state enterprises”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization14358–378
40.
ShirleyM MXuL C, 2000, “Empirical effects of performance contracts: Evidence from China”, paper presented at Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises in China, Beijing, 18–19 January, by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/1919.html
41.
SolowR M, 1956, “A contribution to the theory of economic growth”The Quarterly Journal of Economics7065–94
42.
SolowR M, 1988, “Growth theory and after”The American Economic Review78307–317
43.
SolowR M, 1994, “Perspectives on growth theory”The Journal of Economic Perspectives845–54
44.
StiglerG, 1964The Theory of Price3rd edition (Macmillan, New York)
WangYChangC, 1998, “Economic transition under a semifederalist government: The experience of China”China Economic Review91–23
47.
WattsR LZimmermanJ L, 1983, “Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence”Journal of Law and Economics26613–633
48.
WooW T, 1994, “The art of reforming centrally planned economies: Comparing China, Poland, and Russia”Journal of Comparative Economics18276–308
49.
XuL C, 1998, “Determinants of the repartitioning of property rights between the government and state enterprises”Economic Development and Cultural Change46537–560
50.
XuL CZhuTLinY-M, 2005, “Politician control, agency problems and ownership reform”Economics of Transition131–24
51.
YungPLaiL W C, 2008, “Supervising for quality: An empirical examination of institutional arrangements in China's construction industry”Construction Management and Economics26723–737
52.
ZhangW, 1997, “Decision Rights, residual claim and performance: A theory of how the Chinese state enterprise reform works”China Economic Review867–82
53.
ZhangW, 1998, “A principal-agent theory of the public economy and its applications to China”Economics of Planning31231–251
54.
ZhouMWangX, 2000, “Agency cost and the crisis of China's SOEs”China Economic Review11297–317
55.
ZhouQ, 2002Property Right and Institutional Transformation—The Chinese Experiences (Social Science Works Press, Beijing) [in Chinese]
56.
ZhouQ, 2003Income Is A Series of Events (Arcadia Press, Hong Kong) [in Chinese]
