Generated traffic has received considerable worldwide attention for its ability to congest newly built roads or return improved roads to their original congested states. By investigating impacts resulting from two contentious highway projects in the Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area, Canada, we address two outstanding issues relating to the study of generated traffic. First, we find that the type of measure used to quantify the phenomenon can impact significantly evidence of its existence. Second, we decompose successfully generated traffic into its constituent parts, namely, induced travel and diverted travel. We also identify the source of each component. Next, we document statistically significant changes in the spatial distribution of traffic flows in the vicinities of the new expressways and throughout the entire network. Finally, our analysis of traffic congestion and vehicular emissions of three pollutants (carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides) suggests that while the new expressways may prove beneficial to the system as a whole, this is not the case for their immediate environs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonW PKanaroglouP SMillerE J, 1994Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model for Energy and Environmental Analysis: A Report on Design and ImplementationMcMaster Institute for Energy Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
2.
AndersonW PKanaroglouP SMillerE JBuliungP S, 1996, “Simulating automobile emissions in an integrated urban model”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1520, 71–80
3.
BarrL C, 2000, “Testing for the significance of induced highway travel demand in metropolitan areas”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1706, 1–8
4.
CerveroR, 2002, “Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies”Journal of Planning Literature173–20
5.
CerveroR, 2003, “Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis”Journal of the American Planning Association69145–163
6.
CerveroRHansenM, 2002, “Induced travel demand and induced road investment: A simultaneous equation analysis”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy36469–490
7.
DeCorla-SouzaPCohenH, 1999, “Estimating induced travel for evaluation of metropolitan highway expansion”Transportation26249–262
8.
DETR, 1998A New Deal for Transport: Better for EveryoneDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
9.
DowlingRColmanS, 1995, “Effects of increased highway capacity: Results of household travel behavior survey”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1493, 143–149
10.
DownsA, 1992Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
11.
DreschelA, 2005, “The Red Hill road finally gets a real name”The Hamilton Spectator 4 May 2005; http://www.Hamiltonspectator.com
12.
HansenMHuangY, 1997, “Road supply and traffic in California urban areas”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice31205–218
13.
HansenMGillenDDobbinsAHuangYPuvathingalM, 1993The Air Quality Impacts of Urban Highway Capacity Expansion: Traffic Generation and Land Use ChangeInstitute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA
14.
HillP, 1996, “What is induced traffic?”Transportation235–16
15.
KanaroglouP S, 1999, “New transportation links and urban air quality: The Red Hill Creek expressway, Hamilton, ON”, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Environmental Science and TechnologyPythagorion, Samos, Greece, http://www.gnest.org/Conferences/conference6.htm
16.
LitmanT, 2004Generated Traffic and Induced Travel: Implications for Transport PlanningVictoria Transport Policy Institute, 1250 Rudlin Street, Victoria, BC V8V 3R7
17.
NolandR B, 2001, “Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel”Transportation Research Park A: Policy and Practice3547–72
18.
NolandR BCowartW A, 2000, “Analysis of metropolitan highway capacity and the growth in vehicle miles of travel”Transportation27363–390
19.
NolandR BLemL L, 2002, “A review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71–26
20.
NolandR BQuddusM A, 2006, “Flow improvements and vehicle emissions: Effects of trip generation and emission control technology”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment111–14
21.
PeaceW G, 1998From Mountain to Lake: The Red Hill Creek Valley (W L Griffin Printing, Hamilton, ON)
22.
RodierC JAbrahamJ EJohnstonR AHuntJ D, 2001, “Anatomy of induced travel using an integrated land use and transportation model in the Sacramento Region”, in Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM, number 01–2582), Washington, DC
23.
RuiterELoudonWKernCBeelDRothenbergMAustinT, 1980The Vehicle-miles of Travel – Urban Highway Supply Relationship NCHRP Research Results Digest 127, Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC
24.
SACTRA, 1994Trunk Roads and the Generation of TrafficDepartment of Transport, Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (HMSO, London)
25.
ScottD M, 2002, “Overcoming traffic congestion: A discussion of reduction strategies and behavioral responses from a North American perspective”European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1317–338
26.
ScottD MNovakDAultman-HallLGuoF, 2006, “Network robustness index: A new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks”Journal of Transport Geography14215–227
27.
SenA, 1999Highways and Urban Decentralization (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)
28.
ShrankDLomaxT, 2002The 2002 Urban Mobility ReportTexas Transportation Institute, System 3135, TAMU, College Park, TX 77843–3135
