In this paper we present a computational approach to the integration of mass customization into the design of novel solutions. We propose the use of entropy as a function of the diversity of solutions that can be generated within a design space. This work demonstrates that the potential of design systems to generate novel solutions can be estimated using complexity measures. This principle is implemented in an evolutionary system for the design of automotive instrument panels that display situation-relevant information in configurations that adapt to traffic conditions and driving actions. This sample application shows that the application of complexity maximization as a selection criterion in evolutionary design systems yields a large variety of solutions of high fitness. We also present guidelines for future developments.
BentleyP, 1999Evolutionary Design by Computers (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA)
3.
BodenM A, 1994Dimensions of Creativity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BrahaDMaimonO, 1997, “The design process: Properties, paradigms, and structure”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Part A27146–166
5.
BroekhuizenTAlsemK, 2002, “Success factors for mass customization: A conceptual model”Journal of Market-focused Management5309–330
6.
CampbellJ LCarneyCKantowitzB H, 1998, “Human factors design guidelines for advanced traveler information systems (ATIS)”, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
EdmondsB, 1999Syntactic Measures of Complexity PhD Thesis, Centre for Policy Modelling, University of Manchester
9.
Farhang-MehrAAzarmS, 2002, “Entropy based multiobjective genetic algorithm for design optimization”Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization24351–361
10.
GavrilovaTVoinovA, 1998, “User-centered design of adaptive interfaces for digital libraries”, in Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries Eds NikolaouCStephanidisC (Springer, New York) pp 693–695
11.
GeroJ S, 1990, “Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design”AI Magazine1126–36
12.
GeroJ S, 2000, “Computational models of innovative and creative design processes”Technological Forecasting and Social Change64183–196
13.
GeroJ SKazakovV A, 1999, “Using analogy to extend the behaviour state space in creative design”, in Computational Models of Creative Design IV Eds GeroJ SMaherM L, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, pp 113–143
14.
GeroJ SKazakovV A, 2001, “A genetic engineering extension to genetic algorithms”Evolutionary Systems971–92
15.
GilksW RRichardsonSSpiegelhalterD J, 1996Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (Chapman and Hall, London)
16.
GoldbergD E, 2002The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA)
HoschekW, 2002Colt 1.0.3 Distribution: Open Source Libraries for High Performance Scientific and Technical Computing in Javahttp://cern.ch/hoschek/colt
19.
JiaoJTsengM M, 1999, “A methodology of developing product family architecture for mass customization”Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing103–20
NavinchandraD, 1991Exploration and Innovation in Design: Towards a Computational Model (Springer, New York)
23.
QianLGeroJ S, 1995, “An approach to design exploration using analogy”, in Computational Models of Creative Design Eds GeroJ SMaherM L, Key Centre of Design Computing, University of Sydney, pp 3–36
SareniBLaurentK, 1998, “Fitness sharing and niching methods revisited”IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation297–106
26.
SaundersRGeroJ S, 2002, “How to study artificial creativity”, in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Creativity and Cognition (ACM Press, New York) pp 80–87
27.
ShannonC, 1948, “A mathematical theory of communications”Bell Systems Tech27379–423
SosaRGeroJ S, 2004, “A computational framework for the study of creativity and innovation in design: Effects of social ties”, in Design Computing and Cognition '04 Ed. GeroJ S (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 499–517
30.
StinyG, 1993, “Emergence and continuity in shape grammars”, in CAAD Futures 1993 Eds van WykSFlemmingU (Springer, Berlin) pp 37–54
31.
SvenssonCBarfordA, 2002, “Limits and opportunities in mass customization for ‘build to order’ SMEs”Computers in Industry4977–89
32.
TheirensD, 1997, “Selection schemes, elitist recombination and selection intensity”, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms ICGA-97 Ed. BäckT (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) pp 152–159
33.
TsengM MJiaoJ, 1997, “Case-based evolutionary design for mass customization”Computers and Industrial Engineering33319–324
34.
VoseM D, 1999The Simple Genetic Algorithm: Foundations and Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
35.
WilliamsB C, 1990, “Invention from first principles: An overview”, in Artificial Intelligence in MIT: Expanding Frontiers Eds WinstonP HShelardS (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 430–563
36.
ZhaoFMaherM L, 1992, “Using network-based prototypes to support creative design by analogy and mutation”, in Artificial Intelligence in Design '92 Ed. GeroJ S (Kluwer, Boston, MA) pp 773–793
