Studies suggest that sprawling and auto-oriented development patterns present more difficulties for people without cars to access economic opportunities. We examine intrametropolitan and intermetropolitan variations in job accessibility by commuting mode as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure, selecting Boston, Los Angeles, and Tokyo as study areas. Although in both US and Japanese metropolitan areas, job accessibility is significantly lower for public transit users than for auto users, job accessibility for public transit users in the US cases is strikingly lower than in Tokyo. The international comparison provides a clear picture of the significant disadvantage in accessing job opportunities encountered by US workers who are unable to use private vehicles. The empirical results uncover an important dimension of urban structure that deserves much attention from planners and policymakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AASHTO, 2002, “Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP) 2000: Profiles for United States”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, http://www.transportation.org/ctpp/home/us.htm
BenfieldF KRaimiM DChenD D T, 1999Once There Were Greenfields: How Urban Sprawl is Undermining America's Environment, Economy, and Social FabricNatural Resources Defense Council, 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011
4.
BoarnetM GCraneR, 2001Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel (Oxford University Press, New York)
5.
CaïdNCristPGilbertRWiederkehrP, 2002, “Environmentally sustainable transport: Concept, goal and strategy—the OECD's EST Project”Transport153(4) 219–226
6.
DeakinE, 2001, “Sustainable development and sustainable transportation: strategies for economic prosperity, environmental quality, and equity”, WP 2001-03, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA
7.
DeakinE, 2002, “Sustainable transportation: US dilemmas and European experiences”Transportation Research Record number 1792, 1–11
GeursK TRitsema van EckJ R, 2003, “Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3069–87
10.
HallR PSussmanJ M, 2004, “Sustainable transportation—a strategy for system change-Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
11.
HandyS LNiemeierD A, 1997, “Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives”Environment and Planning A291175–1194
12.
HarrisB, 2001, “Accessibility: Concepts and applications”Journal of Transportation and Statistics4(2/3) 15–30
13.
JohnstonR AGarryG, 2003, “Sustainable development planning tools: Suite of models useful in large metropolitan regions”Transportation Research Record number 1848, 132–136
14.
KaidouK, 2001Compact City: Pursuing Urban Form in Sustainable Society (Gakugei Press, Kyoto City) (in Japanese)
15.
KasardaJ, 1995, “Industrial restructuring and the changing location of jobs”, in State of the Union: America in the 1990svolume 1, Ed. FarleyR (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 215–267
16.
KawabataM, 2002Access to Jobs: Transportation Barriers Faced by Low-skilled Autoless Workers in US Metropolitan Areas unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
17.
KawabataM, 2003a, “Job accessibility by travel mode in US metropolitan areas”Theory and Applications of GIS11(2) 165–172
18.
KawabataM, 2003b, “Job access and employment among low-skilled autoless workers in US metropolitan areas”Environment and Planning A351651–1668
19.
KawabataMTakahashiA, 2004, “Modeling with GIS: OD commuting times by car and public transit in Tokyo”, DP 1102, Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, http://www.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/SSM/libraries/pdf1101/1102/pdf
20.
KenworthyJ RLaubeF BNewmanPBarterPRaadTPoboonCGuiaBJr, 1999An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities 1960–1990 (University of Colorado Press, Boulder, CO)
21.
KwokR C WYehA G O, 2000, “The use of modal accessibility gap as an indicator for sustainable transport development”, in Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century Eds SucharovLBrebbiaC A (WIT Press, Southampton) pp 267–276
22.
LacombeA, 1998, “Welfare reform and access to jobs in Boston”, BTS98-A-02, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
23.
LuoWWangF, 2003, “Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30865–884
24.
MaeK, (Ed.), 2004Myline Tokyo TimetableTransportation Co. Ltd, Kojimachi Tokyu Building 3F, 6-6 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
25.
McGuckinN ASrinivasanN, 2003Journey to Work in the United States and Its Major Metropolitan Areas: 1960–2000 FHWA-EP-03-058, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
RichardsonB C, 2005, “Sustainable transport: Analysis frameworks”Journal of Transport Geography1329–39
28.
SCAG, 2003, “Year 2000 model validation and summary: regional transportation model”, Southern California Association of Governments, http://www.scag.ca.gov/modeling/2000mv.htm
29.
SchwanenTDielemanF MDijstM, 2004, “The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: A multilevel approach”Growth and Change35304–333
30.
ShenQ, 1998, “Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25345–365
31.
ShenQ, 2001, “A spatial analysis of job openings and access in a US metropolitan area”Journal of the American Planning Association6753–68
32.
StegLGiffordR, 2005, “Sustainable transportation and quality of life”Journal of Transport Geography1359–69
33.
TaylorBOngP, 1995, “Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in the US metropolitan areas”Urban Studies321453–1474
34.
TMRTPC, 1999, “4th (1998) Tokyo metropolitan region-person trip survey: Tokyo today as seen by the movements of people”, Tokyo Metropolitan Region Transport Planning Commission, http://www.tokyo-pt.jp/letter/download/vol2E.pdf
35.
Tokyo Bus Association, 2003Route Guide to Tokyo Buses, No. 12Tokyo Bus Association, Ikeda Building 7F, 2-7-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
36.
US HUD, 1998The State of the CitiesUS Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC
37.
WangF, 2003, “Job proximity and accessibility for workers of various wage groups”Urban Geography24253–271
