BattyM, 2004, “A new theory of space syntax”, WP75, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/publications
2.
DijkstraE W, 1959, “A note on two problems in connection with graphs”Numeriske Math1269–271
3.
GarrisonW L, 1960, “Connectivity of the interstate highway system”Regional Science Association, Papers and Proceedings6121–137
4.
HillierB, 1999, “The hidden geometry of deformed grids: Or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn't”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26169–191
5.
HillierBPennA, 2004, “Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31501–511
6.
JoutsiniemiA, 2003, “Comparison of logical binary step based and metric properties in flow networks: Case Helsinki”, in Proceedings, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London June 2003Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, paper 98 (abstract only)
7.
KanskyK J, 1963Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics RP84, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
8.
RattiC, 2004a, “Space syntax: Some inconsistencies”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31487–499
9.
RattiC, 2004b, “Rejoinder to Hillier and Penn”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31513–516
