Despite a burgeoning research effort directed at the design and modelling of effective urban spaces for pedestrians, remarkably little is known about how pedestrians actually negotiate urban spaces. This paper reports the results of a video-based observational study aimed at exploring: (1) individuals' movement preferences within uncluttered environments, in particular: (a) desired walking speed, (b) microscopic position preferences, and (c) interpersonal distances between companions while walking; and (2) the ways in which these variables might be influenced by the various personal, situational, and environmental factors that characterise the context in which pedestrians move. The microscopic movement trajectories of 2613 participants were investigated in a covert, video-based observational study of three mixed-use (residential/retail) urban environments close to the city centres of Edinburgh and York, United Kingdom. Age, gender, level of mobility, group size, time of day, and location were found to have significant effects on movement preferences across the range of locations studied. We concluded that a number of influential factors affect how humans negotiate urban spaces, and suggested how these factors may be taken into account in attempts to design and model effective urban spaces for pedestrians.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-GadhiS AMahmassaniH S, 1991, “Simulation of crowd behavior and movement: Fundamental relations and application”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1320, 260–268
2.
BattyM, 1997, “Predicting where we walk”Nature388, 19–20
3.
BattyM, 2001, “Agent-based pedestrian modelling”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28, 321–326
4.
BlueV JAdlerJ L, 1998, “Emergent fundamental pedestrian flows from cellular automata microsimulation”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1644, 29–36
5.
BolesW, 1981, “The effects of density, sex and group size upon pedestrian walking velocity”Man – Environment Systems11, 37–40
6.
BowmanB LVecellioR L, 1994, “Pedestrian walking speeds and conflicts at urban median locations”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1438, 67–72
7.
BurgessJ W, 1983, “Interpersonal spacing between surrounding nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density”Ethology and Sociobiology4, 11–17
8.
CiolekM T, 1978, “Spatial arrangements in social encounters: An attempt at a taxomomy”Man – Environment Systems8, 52–59
9.
CoffinAMorrallJ, 1995, “Walking speeds of elderly pedestrians at crosswalks”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1487, 63–67
10.
DabbsJ MStokesN A, 1975, “Beauty is power: The use of space on the sidewalk”Sociometry38, 551–557
11.
Data Protection Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 29 (The Stationery Office, London)
12.
FruinJ J, 1971, “Designing for pedestrians a level of service concept”Highway Research Recordnumber 355, 1–15
13.
FuggerT FRandiesB CSteinA CWhitingW CGallagherB, 2000, “Analysis of pedestrian gait and perception/reaction at signal-controlled crosswalk intersections”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1705, 20–25
14.
GaleaE RGalparsoroJ M P, 1994, “A computer based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass transport vehicles”Fire Safety Journal22, 341–366
HabichtA TBraaksmaJ P, 1984, “Effective width of pedestrian corridors”Journal of Transportation Engineering110, 80–93
17.
HaklayMO'SullivanDThurstain-GoodwinMSchelhornT, 2001, “‘So go downtown’: Simulating pedestrian movement in town centres”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28, 343–359
18.
HelbingDMolnárPFarkasI JBolayK, 2001, “Self-organizing pedestrian movement”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28, 361–383
19.
HendersonL F, 1971, “The statistics of crowd fluids”Nature229, 381–383
20.
HillierBPennAHansonJGrajewskiTXuJ, 1993, “Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20, 29–66
21.
HoogendoornS PBovyP H L, 2004, “Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models”Transportation Research B38, 169–190
22.
HoogendoornS PDaamenWBovyP H L, 2003, “Extracting microscopic pedestrian characteristics from video data”, paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC
23.
KerridgeJHineJWiganM, 2001, “Agent-based modelling of pedestrian movements: The questions that need to be asked and answered”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28, 327–341
24.
KnoblauchR LPietruchaM TNitzburgM, 1996, “Field studies of pedestrian walking speed and start-up time”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1538, 27–38
25.
KuklaRKerridgeJWillisAHineJ, 2001, “PEDFLOW: Development of an autonomous agent model of pedestrian flow”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1774, 11–17
26.
KuklaRWillisAKerridgeJ M, 2003, “Application of context-mediated behavior to a multi-agent pedestrian flow model (PEDFLOW)”, paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC; copy available from the authors
27.
KwonYMorichiSYaiT, 1998, “Analysis of pedestrian behavior and planning guidelines with mixed traffic for narrow urban streets”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1636, 116–123
28.
LamW H KMorrallJ FHoH, 1995, “Pedestrian flow characteristics in Hong Kong”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1487, 56–62
29.
LovasG G, 1994, “Modeling and simulation of pedestrian traffic flow”Transport Research B6, 429–443
30.
MakrisDEllisT, 2002, “Path detection in video surveillance”Image and Vision Computing20, 895–903
31.
PolusASchoferJ LUshpizA, 1983, “Pedestrian flow and level of service”Journal of Transportation Engineering109, 46–56
32.
PushkarevBZupanJ M, 1975Urban Space for Pedestrians (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
33.
RottonJShattsMStandersR, 1990, “Temperature and pedestrian tempo: Walking without awareness”Environment and Behaviour22, 650–674
34.
TeknomoKTakeyamaYInamuraH, 2001, “Measuring microscopic flow performance for pedestrians”, paper presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport, Seoul, Korea; copy available from the authors
35.
TRB, 2000Highway Capacity ManualTransportation Research Board, Washington, DC
36.
TurnerAPennA, 2002, “Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: An investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29, 473–490
37.
VirklerM R, 1998, “Prediction and measurement of travel time along pedestrian routes”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1636, 37–42
38.
WillisAKuklaRHineJKerridgeJ M, 2000, “Developing the behavioural rules for an agent-based model of pedestrian movement”Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK P445, 69–80, Association for European Transport, Vernon Mews, Vernon Street, London W14 0RL
39.
WillisAKuklaRKerridgeJ MHineJ, 2002, “Laying the foundations: The use of video footage to explore pedestrian dynamics in PEDFLOW”, in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics Eds SchreckenbergMSharmaS D (Springer, Berlin) pp 181–186
