This paper describes the history and current state of archaeological visibility studies. The first part is a survey of both GIS (geographic information systems) and non-GIS studies of visibility by archaeologists, which demonstrates how advances in GIS visibility studies have tended to recapitulate, albeit over a compressed timescale, theoretically driven developments in non-GIS studies. The second part presents an example of the kind of methodological development required for the use of GIS to contribute to the agenda set by certain strands of a more humanistic archaeology. An algorithm developed to retrieve various summaries of the inclination at which points on the horizon are visible from a specified viewpoint was applied to nineteen recumbent stone circles in the Grampian region of Scotland. The results suggest that these summaries provide a useful tool for ‘unpacking’ what archaeologists mean when they claim that the topographic setting of certain stone circles creates an ‘impression of circularity’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldenderferM, 1996, “Introduction”, in Anthropology, Space and Geographical Information Systems Eds AldenderferMMaschnerH D G (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 3–18
2.
BarnattJ, 1989Stone Circles of Britain: Taxonomic and Distributional Analyses and a Catalogue of Sites in England, Scotland and Wales (British Archaeological Reports, Oxford)
3.
BarnattJPierpontS, 1983, “Stone circles: Observatories or ceremonial centres?”Scottish Archaeological Review2101–115
4.
BarrettJ C, 1994Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC (Blackwell, Oxford)
5.
BatchelorD, 1999, “The use of GIS for archaeological sensitivity and visibility analysis at Stonehenge, Avebury and associated sites, World Heritage site, United Kingdom”, in GIS and Cultural Resource Management: A Manual for Heritage Managers Ed. BoxP (UNESCO, Bangkok) pp 118–128
6.
BenderBHamiltonSTilleyC, 1997, “Leskernick: Stone worlds; alternative narratives; nested landscapes”Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society63147–178
7.
BradleyR, 1991, “Rock art and the perception of landscape”Cambridge Archaeological Journal177–101
8.
BradleyR, 1994, “Symbols and signposts-understanding the prehistoric petroglyphs of the British Isles”, in The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology Eds RenfrewCZubrowE B W (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 95–106
9.
BradleyR, 1998The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (Routledge, London)
10.
BradleyRBallCCroftSPhilipsT, 2002, “The stone circles of northeast Scotland in the light of excavation”Antiquity76840–848
11.
BradleyRHardingJMathewsM, 1993a, “The siting of prehistoric rock art in Galloway, south-west Scotland”Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society59269–283
12.
BradleyRHardingJRipponSMathewsM, 1993b, “A field method for investigating the distribution of rock art”Oxford Journal of Archaeology12129–145
13.
BurlA, 1976The Stone Circles of the British Isles (Yale University Press, London)
14.
BurlA, 1979Rings of Stone: The Prehistoric Stone Circles of Britain and Ireland (Book Club Associates, London)
15.
ChapmanH, 2000, “Understanding wetland archaeological landscapes: GIS, environmental analysis and landscape reconstruction; pathways and narratives”, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies Ed. LockG (IOS Press, Amsterdam) pp 49–59
16.
ChorleyR JHaggettP (Eds), 1967Models in Geography (Methuen, London)
ClarkeD L (Ed.), 1972Models in Archaeology (Methuen, London)
19.
CurryM R, 1998Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies (Routledge, London)
20.
DevereuxP, 1991, “Three-dimensional aspects of apparent relationships between selected natural and artificial features within the topography of the Avebury complex”Antiquity65894–898
21.
DrewettP (Ed.), 1982The Archaeology of Bullock Down, Eastbourne, East Sussex: The Development of a Landscape (The Sussex Archaeological Society, Lewes, Sussex)
22.
EdmondsMThomasJ (Eds), 1990, “Papers from the Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG) Conference, Newcastle 1989”Scottish Archaeological Review71–36
FisherP F, 1996, “Reconsideration of the viewshed function in terrain modelling”Geographical Systems333–58
25.
FisherP F, 1999, “Geographical information systems: Today and tomorrow?”, in The Archaeology of Mediterranean Landscapes, Volume 3: Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology Eds GillingsMMattinglyDvan DalenJ (Oxbow Books, Oxford) pp 5–12
26.
FisherP FFarrellyCMaddocksARugglesC, 1997, “Spatial analysis of visible areas from the Bronze Age cairns of Mull”Journal of Archaeological Science24581–592
27.
FraserD, 1983Land and Society in Neolithic Orkney (British Archaeological Reports, Oxford)
28.
FraserD, 1988, “The orientation of visibility from the chambered cairns of Eday, Orkney”, in Records in Stone Ed. RugglesC L N (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 325–337
29.
GaffneyVStančičZ, 1991GIS Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Case Study of the Island of Hvar (Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete, Ljubljana)
30.
GaffneyVStanccar;ičZ, 1992, “Diodorus siculus and the island of Hvar, Dalmatia: Testing the text with GIS”, in Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991 Eds LockGMoffettJ (Tempvs Reparatvm, Oxford) pp 113–126
31.
GaffneyVStanccar;ičZWatsonH, 1996, “Moving from catchments to cognition: Tentative steps toward a larger archaeological context for GIS”, in Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems Eds AldenderferMMaschnerH D G (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 132–154
32.
GibbonG, 1989Explanation in Archaeology (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
HiguchiT, 1983The Visual and Spatial Structure of Landscapes translated by TerryC S (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
39.
HodderI, 1986Reading the Past (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
40.
KristF JBrownD G, 1994, “GIS modelling of Palaeo-Indian period caribou migrations and viewsheds in northeastern Lower Michigan”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing601129–1137
41.
LakeM WWoodmanP E, 2000, “Viewshed analysis of site location on Islay”, in Hunter – Gatherer Landscape Archaeology: The Southern Hebrides Mesolithic Project, 1988–98, Volume 2: Archaeological Fieldwork on Colonsay, Computer Modelling, Experimental Archaeology, and Final Interpretations Ed. MithenS J (The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge) pp 497–503
42.
LakeM WWoodmanP EMithenS J, 1998, “Tailoring GIS software for archaeological applications: An example concerning viewshed analysis”Journal of Archaeological Science2527–38
43.
LloberaM, 1996, “Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology”Antiquity70612–622
44.
LloberaM, 2001, “Building past landscape perception with GIS: Understanding topographic prominence”Journal of Archaeological Science281005–1014
45.
LockG (Ed.), 2000Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies (IOS Press, Amsterdam)
46.
LootsL, 1997, “The use of projective and reflective viewsheds in the analysis of the Hellenistic city defence system at Sagalassos, Turkey”Archaeological Computing Newsletter4912–16
47.
LootsLNackaertsKWaelkensM, 1999, “Fuzzy viewshed analysis of the Hellenistic city defence system at Sagalassos, Turkey”, in Archaeology in the Age of the Internet: CAA 97: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology: Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997 Eds DingwallLExonSGaffneyVLaflinSvan LeusenM (Archaeopress, Oxford) CD-Rom
48.
MadryS L HCrumleyC L, 1990, “An application of remote sensing and GIS in a regional archaeological settlement pattern analysis: The Arroux River Valley, Burgundy, France”, in Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology Eds AllenK M SGreenS WZubrowE B W (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 364–380
49.
MadrySRakosL, 1996, “Line-of-sight and cost surface techniques for regional archaeological research in the Arroux River Valley”, in New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research Ed. MaschnerH D G (Southern Illinois University Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, IL) pp 104–126
50.
OzawaKKatoTTsudeH, 1995, “Detection of beacon networks between ancient hillforts using a digital terrain model based gis”, in Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1994 Eds HuggettJRyanN (Archaeological Reports, Oxford) pp 157–162
51.
RelphE, 1976Place and Placelessness (Pion, London)
52.
RenfrewC, 1973, “Monuments, mobilisation and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex”, in The Explanation of Culture Change Ed. RenfrewC (Duckworth, London) pp 539–558
53.
RenfrewC, 1976, “Megaliths, territories and populations”, in Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, Mainly During the Neolithic Period and the Bronze Age Ed. LaetS J D (De Tempel, Brugge) pp 198–220
54.
RenfrewC, 1982Towards an Archaeology of Mind (Inaugral Lecture to the University of Cambridge) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
55.
RenfrewC, 1994, “Towards a cognitive archaeology”, in The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology Eds RenfrewCZubrowE B W (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 3–12
56.
RichardsC, 1996, “Monuments as landscape: Creating the centre of the world in late Neolithic Orkney”World Archaeology28190–208
57.
RodawayP, 1994Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place (Routledge, London)
58.
RoeseH, 1980, “Some aspects of topographical location of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments in Wales, 1: Menhirs”Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies28645–655
59.
RugglesC L N, 1984, “A new study of the Aberdeenshire recumbent stone circles, 1: Site data”Archaeoastronomy655–79
60.
RugglesC L NBurlH A W, 1985, “A new study of the Aberdeenshire recumbent stone circles, 2: Interpretation”Archaeoastronomy825–60
61.
RugglesC L NMedyckyj-ScottD J, 1996, “Site location, landscape visibility, and symbolic astronomy: A Scottish case study”, in New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research Ed. MaschnerH D G, OP 23 (Southern Illinois University Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, IL) pp 127–146
62.
RugglesC L NMartlewRHingeP, 1991, “The North Mull project (2): The wider astronomical significance of the sites”Archaeoastronomy1651–75
63.
RugglesC L NMedyckyj-ScottD JGruffyddA, 1993, “Multiple viewshed analysis using gis and its archaeological application: A case study in northern Mull”, in Computing the Past Eds AndresenJMadsenTScollarI (Aarhus University Press, Aarhus) pp 125–132
64.
ShanksMTilleyC, 1987Re-constructing Archaeology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
65.
SuiD Z, 1994, “GIS and urban studies: Positivism, post-positivism and beyond”Urban Geography15258–278
66.
ThornA, 1955, “A statistical examination of the megalithic sites in Britain”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society118275–295
67.
ThornA, 1967Megalithic Sites in Britain (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
68.
ThomasJ, 1991Rethinking the Neolithic (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
69.
ThomasJ, 1993, “The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape”, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives Ed. BenderB (Berg, Oxford) pp 19–48
70.
TilleyC, 1994A Phenomenology of Landscape: Paths, Places and Monuments (Berg, Oxford)
71.
TschanA PRaczkowskiWLatałowaM, 2000, “Perception and viewsheds; are they mutually inclusive?”, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies Ed. LockG (IOS Press, Amsterdam) pp 28–48
72.
TuanY-F, 1977Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience (Arnold, London)
73.
UnderwoodG, 1969The Pattern of the Past (Museum Press, London)
74.
van LeusenP M, 1993, “Cartographic modelling in a cell-based GIS”, in Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1992 Eds AndresenJMadsenTScollarI (Aarhus University Press, Aarhus) pp 105–123
75.
van LeusenP M, 1999, “Viewshed and cost surface analysis using GIS (cartographic modelling in a cell-based GIS II)”, in New Techniques for Old Times—CAA98—Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology: Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona 1998 (British Archaeological Reports, Oxford) pp 215–223
76.
WansleebenMVerhartL, 1997, “Geographical information systems: Methodological progress and theoretical decline”Archaeological Dialogues153–70
77.
WheatleyD, 1993, “Going over old ground: GIS, archaeological theory and the act of perception”, in Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1992 Eds AndresenJMadsenTScollarI (Aarhus University Press, Aarhus) pp 133–138
78.
WheatleyD, 1995, “Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application”, in Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems Eds LockGStančiccar;Z (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 171–186
79.
WheatleyD, 1996, “The use of GIS to understand regional variation in earlier Neolithic Wessex”, in New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research Ed. MaschnerH D G, OP 23 (Southern Illinois University Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, IL) pp 75–103
80.
WheatleyDGillingsM, 2000, “Vision, perception and GIS: Developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility”, in Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies Ed. LockG (IOS Press, Amsterdam) pp 1–27
81.
WilliamsW G, 1968, “Stone age circles ‘form pattern of power’”Daily Telegraph 23 September
82.
WitcherR, 1999, “GIS and landscapes of perception”, in The Archaeology of Mediterranean Landscapes, Volume 3: Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology Eds GillingsMMattinglyDvan DalenJ (Oxbow Books, Oxford) pp 13–22
83.
WoodmanP E, 2000, “Beyond significant patterning, towards past intentions: The location of Orcadian chambered tombs”, in Proceedings of the UK Chapter of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1999 Eds BuckCCummingsVHenleyCMillsSTrickS (Archaeopress, Oxford) pp 91–105
84.
WrightD JGoodchildM FProctorJ D, 1997, “Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as ‘tool’ verus ‘science’”The Annals of the Association of American Geographers87346–362
85.
YokoyamaRShirasawaMPikeR J, 2002, “Visualizing topography by openness: A new application of image processing to digital elevation models”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing68257–265
