The radical restructuring of New Zealand's planning system in 1991 was based on the Resource Management Act and significant amendments to the Local Government Act 1974. In this paper we report a study of urban planning in New Zealand under this new regime. Amendments to the Local Government Act were designed in large part to facilitate the administration of the Resource Management Act, the authors of which wanted to emphasise the sustainable management of the biophysical environment and dramatically to limit local government's involvement in urban and social planning. Ironically, the strategic planning provisions of the amended Local Government Act gave local government contradictory powers. We discuss the nature of this contradiction and its impacts on the ways in which district planning under the Resource Management Act and strategic planning under the Local Government Act have combined to create new and unforseen approaches to urban planning and management in New Zealand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AasenC T, 1992, “The urban sustainability question. New Zealand cities, culture and planning”, keynote address to New Zealand Planning Institute 1992 Annual ConferencePlanning Quarterly10615–19
2.
AngottiT, 1993Metropolis 2000: Planning, Poverty, and Politics (Routledge, London)
3.
BlythS, 2000, “Shifting to a sustainable city? Citizen participation in Wellington's Our City—Our Future Strategy”, unpublished MA thesis, Department of Social Policy, Massey University, Palmerston North
4.
BrittonSLe HeronRPawsonE (Eds), 1992Changing Places in New Zealand: A Geography of Restructuring (New Zealand Geographical Society, Christchurch)
5.
ByrneD, 1998Social Exclusion (Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
6.
DupuisAThornsD C, 1997, “Regional variations in housing and wealth accumulation in New Zealand”Urban Policy and Research15189–202
7.
FookesT, 1992, “Social and economic matters—some thoughts on how these can be dealt with under the Resource Management Act”, Ministry for the Environment, PO Box 10-362, Wellington
8.
GowL, 1999, “Forging links: social research and environmental sustainability and social science”, in Forging Links: Social and Environmental Sustainability and Social Science ResearchUNESCO and Royal Society of New Zealand, PO Box 598, Wellington
9.
HarveyD, 1978, “The ideology of planning”, in Planning Theory in the 1980s Eds BurchellR WSternliebG (Centre for Urban Policy and Research, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 213–233
10.
HughesP, 2000, “The contribution of the Resource Management Act 1991 to sustainability: a report card after 8 years”, paper presented at the Water 2000, Water Conference and Expo “Guarding the global resource”, New Zealand Water and Waste Association, Auckland, 19–23 March; copy available from the author at the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington
11.
Le HeronRPawsonE, 1996Changing Places: New Zealand in the 1990s (Longman, Auckland)
12.
LindblomC E, 1959, “The science of muddling through”Public Administration Review1979–88
13.
LindblomC E, 1979, “Still muddling not yet through”Public Administration Review November-December 517–526
14.
LoflandJLoflandL H, 1995Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis3rd edition (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA)
15.
MemonP A, 1991, “Shaking off the colonial legacy? Town and country planning in New Zealand, 1870s to 1980s”Planning Perspectives619–32
16.
MemonP A, 1993Keeping New Zealand Green: Recent Environmental Reforms (University of Otago Press, Dunedin)
17.
MemonP AGleesonB J, 1995, “Towards a new planning paradigm? Reflections on New Zealand's Resource Management Act”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22109–124
18.
MemonP APerkinsH C (Eds), 1993Environmental Planning in New Zealand (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
19.
MemonP APerkinsH C (Eds), 2000Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
20.
MurrayJSwaffieldS, 1994, “Myths for environmental management: a review of the Resource Management Act 1991”New Zealand Geographer5848–52
21.
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 1998, “The cities and their people: New Zealand's urban environment”, report from the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, PO Box 10-241, Wellington
22.
PerkinsH CThornsD C, 1999a, “Urban sustainability—the basis for a renewed urban planning and management project?”, in Urban Sustainability in New Zealand miscellaneous series 53, report of a workshop sponsored by the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO, and the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, The Royal Society of New Zealand, PO Box 598, Wellington
23.
PerkinsH CThornsD C, 1999b, “Urban planning in New Zealand; the influences of the Resource Management Act and the Local Government Act”, in Urban Sustainability in New Zealand miscellaneous series 53, report of a workshop sponsored by the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO, and the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, The Royal Society of New Zealand, PO Box 598, Wellington
24.
PerkinsH CThornsD C, 2000, “The impact of place promotion strategies on urban planning and development”, in Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand Eds MemonP APerkinsH C (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
25.
PerkinsH CMemonP ASwaffieldS RGelfandL, 1993, “The urban environment”, in Environmental Planning in New Zealand Eds MemonP APerkinsH C (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
26.
Royal Society of New Zealand, 1999Urban Sustainability in New Zealand miscellaneous series 53, report of a workshop sponsored by the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO, and the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, The Royal Society of New Zealand, PO Box 598, Wellington
27.
Saville-SmithK, 1999, “Sustainable cities; the social drivers”, in Urban Sustainability in New Zealand miscellaneous series 53, report of a workshop sponsored by the Royal Society of New Zealand, the New Zealand National Commission for UNESCO, and the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, The Royal Society of New Zealand, PO Box 598, Wellington
28.
SchöllmannAPerkinsH CMooreK, 2000, “Intersecting global and local influences in urban place promotion: the case of Christchurch, New Zealand”Environment and Planning A3255–76
29.
SwaffieldS R, 1997, “Sustainable management and the pastoral ideal”Environment Politics6(2) 101–122
30.
ThornsD C, 1990, “Urban”, in New Zealand Society: A Sociological Introduction Eds SpoonleyPPearsonDShirleyI (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
31.
Waitakere City Council, 1996, “Greenprint Waitakere: sustainable, dynamic, just”, final draft, July, Waitakere City Council, Private Bag 93109, Henderson, Waitakere
