Despite stereotypes that cyberspace spells the ‘end of geography’ and promises universal, democratic entree to the electronic highways of the world economy, access to the Internet is highly unevenly distributed both socially and spatially. In this paper I examine the geopolitics of Internet access and its implications. I open by situating electronic communications within contemporary social theory, emphasizing cyberspace as a contested terrain of competing discourses. Second, international discrepancies in access are illustrated, dramatizing the ways in which the Internet enhances the advantages enjoyed by a global elite consisting largely of white, male professionals. Third, I turn to discrepancies in Internet access within the United States, including class, racial, gender, and spatial disparities. I seek to demonstrate that geography still matters; the Internet creates and reflects a distinct spatial structure interlaced with, and often reinforcing, existing relations of wealth and power.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsP, 1996, “Protest and the scale politics of telecommunications”Political Geography15419–441
2.
AndersonTMelchiorA, 1995, “Assessing telecommunications as a tool for urban community building”Journal of Urban Technology329–44
3.
BaldwinTMcVoyDSteinfieldC, 1996Convergence: Integrating Media, Information and Communication (Sage, London)
4.
BarnesTDuncanJ (Eds), 1992Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape (Routledge, London)
5.
BellD, 1980The Winding Passage (Basic Books, New York)
6.
BoltDCrawfordR, 2000Digital Divide: Computers and Our Children's Future (TV Books, New York)
7.
BoweF, 1993, “Access to the information age: Fundamental decisions in telecommunications policy”Policy Studies Journal212–19
8.
BrockmanJ, 1996Digerati: Encounters with the Cyber Elite (Hardwired, New York)
9.
CairncrossF, 1997The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
10.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
11.
CastellsM, 1997The Power of Identity (Blackwell, Oxford)
12.
Chan-OlmstedS, 1998, “Mergers, acquisitions, and convergence: The strategic alliances of broadcasting, cable television, and telephone services”The Journal of Media Economics11(3)33–46
13.
CookeKLehrerD, 1993, “The Internet: The whole world is talking”The Nation25760–63
CosgroveD, 1985Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape (Croom Helm, London)
16.
CresswellT, 1997, “Weeds, plagues, and bodily secretions: A Geographical interpretation of metaphors of displacement”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87330–345
17.
CroninM, 1996Global Advantage on the Internet (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)
Doheny-FarinaS, 1996The Wired Neighborhood (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
20.
DuncanNSharpJ, 1993, “Confronting representation(s)”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11473–486
21.
FoucaultM, 1972Power/Knowledge (Pantheon Books, New York)
22.
FroehlingO, 1997, “The cyberspace ‘war of ink and internet’ in Chiapas, Mexico”Geographical Review87291–307
23.
GibbsDTannerK, 1997a, “Information and communication technologies and local economic development policies: The British case”Regional Studies31768–774
24.
GibbsDTannerK, 1997b, “Communications technology, local economies and regulation theory”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie8829–40
25.
GrahamS, 1998, “The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology”Progress in Human Geography22165–185
26.
GrahamSAurigiA, 1997, “Virtual cities, social polarization, and the crisis in urban public space”Journal of Urban Technology419–52
27.
GrahamSMarvinS, 1996Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (Routledge, London)
GreenmanC, 2000, “Life in the slow lane: Rural residents are frustrated by sluggish web access and a scarcity of local information online”New York Times18 May, page D1
30.
GrimesSLyonsG, 1994, “Information technology and rural development: Unique opportunity or potential threat?”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development6219–237
31.
GrossmanL, 1995The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age (Viking Press, New York)
32.
GuthrieKDuttonW, 1992, “The politics of citizen access technology: The development of public information utilities in four cities”Journal of Policy Studies20574–596
33.
HafnerK, 2000, “A credibility gap in the digital divide”New York Times5 March, page 4
34.
HafnerKLyonM, 1996Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet (Simon and Schuster, New York)
35.
HarleyB, 1989, “Deconstructing the map”Cartographica261–20
36.
HarleyB, 1990, “Cartography, ethics and social theory”Cartographica271–23
37.
HarmonA, 1996, “Computing in the '90s: The great divide”Los Angeles Times7 October, page 1
38.
HarmonA, 1998, “Blacks found to trail whites in cyberspace”New York Times17 April, page 1
HepworthM, 1990Geography of the Information Economy (Guilford Press, London)
41.
HillisK, 1998, “On the margins: The invisibility of communications in geography”Progress in Human Geography22543–566
42.
HoffmanDNovakT, 1998, “Bridging the racial divide on the Internet”Science280390–391
43.
HugillP, 1999Global Communications Since 1844: Geopolitics and Technology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
44.
JimenizEGreensteinS, 1998, “The emerging Internet retailing market as a nested diffusion process”International Journal of Innovation Management2281–308
45.
JonesS (Ed.), 1995Cyber Society: Computer-mediated Communication and Community (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
46.
JonesS (Ed.), 1997Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety (Sage, London)
47.
KitchinR, 1998aCybespace: The World in the Wires (John Wiley, New York)
48.
KitchinR, 1998b, “Towards geographies of cyberspace”Progress in Human Geography22385–406
49.
KozolJ, 1991Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools (HarperCollins, New York)
50.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
51.
LyonD, 1994The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
52.
McConnaugheyJNilaCSloanT, 1995, “Falling through the net: a survey of the ‘have note’ in rural and urban America”, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, available at www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
53.
McConnaugheyJLaderW, 1998, “Falling through the net II: new data on the digital divide”, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, available at www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html
54.
MillerS, 1996Civilizing Cyberspace: Policy Power and the Information Superhighway (ACM Press, New York)
55.
MitchellW, 1995City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
56.
MonmonierM, 1991How to Lie with Maps (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
57.
MorleyDRobinsK, 1995Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries (Routledge, London)
58.
MossMMitraS, 1998, “Net equity: A Report on income and internet access”Journal of Urban Technology523–32
59.
MungoPCloughB, 1993Approaching Zero: The Extraordinary Underworld of Hackers, Phreakers, Virus Writers, and Keyboard Criminals (Random House, New York)
60.
NegroponteN, 1995Being Digital (Knopf, New York)
61.
NeumannA, 1996, “The resistance network”Wired January issue, pages 108–114
62.
NorrisDKraemerK, 1996, “Mainframe and PC computing in American cities: Myths and realities”Public Administration Review56568–576
63.
NTIA, 1999, “Falling through the net: defining the digital divide”, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce, available at www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99
64.
NTIA, 2000, “Advanced telecommunications in rural America”, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce, US Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, and Rural Utilities Service, available at www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/ruralbb42600.pdf
65.
O'LearS, 1996, “Using electronic mail (e-mail) surveys for geographic research: Lessons from a survey of Russian environmentalists”The Professional Geographer48209–217
66.
PicklesJ (Ed.), 1995Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems (Guilford Press, New York)
67.
PosterM, 1989The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
68.
PressL, 1997, “Tracking the global diffusion of the Internet”Communications of the American Council of Computing Sciences40(11) 11–17
69.
ResnickMRuskN, 1996, “Access is not enough: Computer clubhouses in the inner city”The American Prospect7(27) 60–68
70.
RosenthalE, 2000, “China lists controls to restrict the use of e-mail and web”New York Times27 January, pages 1–12
71.
SawickiDCraigW, 1996, “The democratization of data: Bridging the gap for community groups”Journal of the American Planning Association68219–231
72.
SchementJ, 1998Thorough Americans: Minorities and the New Media (The Aspen Institute, Boulder, CO)
73.
SchillerD, 1999Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
74.
SchillerH, 1993, “The information highway: Public way or private road?”The Nation25764–65
75.
SchulerD, 1996New Community Networks: Wired for Change (Addison-Wesley, New York)
76.
ShieldsR (Ed.), 1996Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies (Sage, London)
77.
TapscottD, 1995The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence (McGraw-Hill, New York)
78.
The Economist1996, “The economics of the internet”, 19 October, pages 21–24
79.
ThriftN, 1995, “A hyperactive world”, in Geographies of Global Change Eds JohnstonR JTaylorPWattsM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 18–35
80.
TofflerA, 1980The Third Wave (William Morrow, New York)
81.
TsengKLitmanB, 1998, “The impact of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on RBOCs and MSOs. Case study: The merger of US West and Continental Cablevision”The Journal of Media Economics11(3) 47–64
82.
WarfB, 1995, “Telecommunications and the changing geographies of knowledge transmission in the late 20th century”Urban Studies32361–378
83.
WarfBGrimesJ, 1997, “Counterhegemonic discourses and the Internet”Geographical Review87259–274
84.
WaxE, 2000, “Across the e-divide”Wall Street Journal17 May, page G8
85.
WheelerDO'KellyM, 1999, “Network topology and city accessibility of the commercial Internet”The Professional Geographer51327–339
86.
WoodD, 1992The Power of Maps (Guilford Press, New York)
87.
ZipfG, 1946, “Some determinants of the circulation of information”American Journal of Psychology59401–421
