With the maturation of GIS technology, several planning scholars have turned their attention to the nature of the relationship between GIS technology and its “fit” into the planning process. Drawing various insights from the diverse fields of information systems, management information systems, and organizational theory, these scholars have started to assemble a theoretical framework from which to understand and manage the integration of GIS into the workplace. In this paper I will draw on these initial efforts to evaluate the relationship between “technology” and “process” in a Third World context. Using Nedović-Budić's conceptualization of the process of “mutual adaptation” as a conceptual starting point, I will provide an in-depth analysis of GIS implementation in the southwest Pacific nation of Papua New Guinea (PNG). PNG's experiences offer a unique insight into the dynamics of mutual adaptation and also point out the limitations of this concept. I conclude by extrapolating beyond the “particular localisms” of PNG to find that the broader political economy of the planning environment dictates the success of GIS integration. Moreover it also suggests that managing the phases of mutual adaptation in an effort to promote GIS implementation is only likely to succeed in circumstances where the broader political economy of planning is in itself conducive to the long-term integration needs of GIS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-AnkaryK M, 1991, “An incremental approach for establishing a geographic information system in a developing country: Saudi Arabia”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5(1) 85–98
2.
BasherL RTrangmarB BRijkseW C, 1995, “Handbook for land resource survey methods in Papua New Guinea”, PNGRIS report number 1, AIDAB, GPO Box 2601, Canberra, ACT
3.
BellamyJ AMcAlpineJ R, 1995, “Papua New Guinea inventory of natural resources, population distribution and land use handbook”, second edition, PNGRIS report number 6, AIDAB, GPO Box 2601, Canberra, ACT
4.
BrownM M, 1997, “An empirical assessment of the hurdles to geographic information system success in local governments”State and Local Government Review28193–204
5.
BudićZ D, 1993, “GIS use among southeastern local governments”Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association54–17
6.
BudićZ D, 1994, “Effectiveness of geographic information systems in local planning”Journal of the American Planning Association60244–263
7.
BudićZ DGodschalkD R, 1994, “Implementation and management effectiveness in adoption of GIS technology in local governments”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems18285–304
8.
BurroughP A, 1992, “Possibilities and constraints of GIS applications in developing countries”Nederlandse Geografische Studies15217–25
9.
CampbellH, 1994, “How effective are GIS in practice? A case study of British local government”International Journal of Geographic Information Systems8309–325
10.
CampbellHMasserI, 1995GIS and Organizations (Taylor and Francis, London)
11.
CartwrightT J, 1993, “Geographic information technology as appropriate technology for development”, in Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Technologies Eds MasserIOnsrudH J (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 261–274
12.
ChrismanN, 1997Exploring Geographic Information Systems (John Wiley, New York)
13.
ChristianC SStewartG A, 1968, “Methodology of integrated surveys”Aerial Surveys and Integrated Studies: Proceedings of Toulouse Conference (UNESCO, Paris) pp 233–280
14.
CowenD J, 1990, “GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: What are the differences?”, in Introductory Readings in Geographic Information Systems Eds PeuquetD JMarbleD F (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 52–61
15.
De'AthC, 1980The Throwaway People: Social Impact of the Gogol Timber Project, Madang Province monograph 13, Institute of Applied Social and Economic Research, PO Box 5854, Boroko, Papua New Guinea
16.
DownsI, 1980The Australian Trusteeship Papua New Guinea 1945–1975 (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra)
17.
EyreL A, 1989, “JAMGIS: The first Jamaican government comprehensive multidata geographic information system”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems3363–371
18.
FilerC, 1998Loggers, Donors and Resource Owners Policy that Works for Forests and People Series, number 2, National Research Institute, PO Box 5854, Boroko, Papua New Guinea/International Institute for Environment and Development, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD
19.
Forestry Act, 1991, number 30, Independent State of Papua New Guinea
20.
FoxJ M, 1991, “Spatial information for resource management in Asia: A review of institutional issues”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5(1) 59–72
21.
Greenpeace Pacific, 1998, “Sustaining Papua New Guinea's natural heritage: An analysis of the Papua New Guinea National Forest Plan”, draft report by Greenpeace Pacific/World Wide Fund for Nature, San Francisco, CA; copy available from the author
22.
HarrisB, 1990, “Urban and regional planning in the Third World with geographic information system support”Regional Development Dialogue11(3) 17–57
23.
HastingsD AClarkD M, 1991, “GIS in Africa: Problems, challenges and opportunities for cooperation”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5(1) 29–39
24.
HolzknechtH, 1994Introduction to Incorporated Land Groups unpublished manuscript; copy available from the author
25.
HuxholdW E, 1993, “The application of research and development from the information systems field to GIS implementation in local government: Some theories on successful adoption and use of GIS technology”, in Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Systems Eds MasserIOnsrudH J (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 61–76
26.
InnesJ ESimpsonD M, 1993, “Implementing GIS for planning: Lessons from the history of technological innovation”Journal of the American Planning Association59230–236
27.
KeigGMcAlpineJ R, 1988, “Development of resource information systems in Papua New Guinea and South-East Asia”, in URPIS 16: Information Systems in Action: Proceedings of the 1988 AURISA Annual ConferenceAustralasian Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, PO Box 307, Deakin West, ACT 2600, pp 24–37
28.
KeigGCuddyS MMcAlpineJ RFreyneD F, 1987, “The Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS): A microcomputer-based aid for national land use planning”, paper presented at the Huon Seminar, Lae, PNG, September, 1987
29.
MabbuttJ A, 1968, “Review of concepts of land evaluation”, in Land Evaluation Ed. StewartG A (Macmillan, South Melbourne) pp 11–28
30.
McAlpineJ RKeigG, 1989, “Linking low cost resource information systems with low cost LIS”, paper presented at the International Symposium on Low Cost LIS—State of the Art and Future Implications; copy available from the author
31.
MasserICragliaM, 1997, “The diffusion of GIS in local government in Europe”, in Geographic Information Research: Bridging the Atlantic Eds CragliaMCouclelisH (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 95–110
32.
MillerSHyslopEKulaGBurrowsI, 1994, “Status of biodiversity in Papua New Guinea”, in Papua New Guinea Country Study on Biodiversity Eds SekranNMillerS, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 6601, Boroko, Papua New Guinea
33.
MontaguA S, 1995, “Institutional arrangements for the future management of the Papua New Guinea Resource Information System”, PNGRIS DP-1, AIDAB, GPO Box 2601, Canberra, ACT
34.
MontaguA S, 1997Natural Resource Management in Papua New Guinea: An Analysis of the Forestry Sector PhD thesis, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL
35.
MooreG C, 1993, “Implications from MIS research for the study of GIS diffusion: Some initial evidence”, in Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Systems Eds MasserIOnsrudH J (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 77–94
36.
Nedović-BudićZ D, 1997, “GIS technology and organisational context: Interaction and adaptation”, in Geographic Information Research: Bridging the Atlantic Eds CragliaMCouclelisH (Taylor and Francis, London) pp 165–184
37.
Nedović-BudićZ, 1998, “The impact of GIS technology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25681–692
38.
Papua New Guinea Forest Authority, 1996National Forest Plan: May 1996PNGFA, PO Box 5055, Boroko, Papua New Guinea
39.
PrinceJ R, 1969Science Concepts in a Pacific Culture (Angus and Robertson, Sydney)
40.
SimpsonG, 1997, “Get what you can while you can: The landowner — government relationship in West New Britain”, in The Political Economy of Forest Management in Papua New Guinea Ed. FilerC, monograph 32, National Research Institute, PO Box 5854, Papua New Guinea/International Institute for Environment and Development, 3 Endsleigh Street, London, pp 17–34
41.
SwartzendruberJ F, 1994Papua New Guinea Conservation Needs Assessment: Synopsis ReportBiodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC
42.
TaylorD R F, 1991, “GIS and developing nations”, in Geographic Information Systems: Overview, Principles and Applications, Volume 1 Eds MaguireD JGoodchildM FRhindD W (John Wiley, New York) pp 71–84
43.
WigginsL L, 1993, “Diffusion and use of geographic information systems in public sector agencies in the United States”, in Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Systems Eds MasserIOnsrudH J (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 147–163
44.
YehA G, 1991, “The development and applications of geographic information systems for urban and regional planning in the developing countries”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5(1) 5–27
