In this paper the possibilities of using tradeable permits in the regulation of road transport externalities are explored. After discussing the theory of tradeable permits and some practical applications, we will identify a number of potentially promising applications of their usage for coping with road transport externalities. These include applications on the demand side (user oriented) and on the supply side (automobile and fuel industry).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdarZGriffinJ M, 1976, “Uncertainty and the choice of pollution control instruments”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management3178–188
2.
BaumolW JOatesW E, 1988The Theory of Environmental Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
3.
BuchananJTullockG, 1975, “Polluters' profits and political response: Direct controls versus taxes”American Economic Review65139–147
4.
ButtonK J, 1993Transport, the Environment and Economic Policy (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants)
5.
CoaseR H, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics31–44
6.
CropperM LOatesW E, 1992, “Environmental economics: A survey”Journal of Economic Literature30675–740
7.
DalesJ G, 1968, “Land, water, and ownership”Canadian Journal of Economics1791–804
8.
DalyH E, 1989, “Steady-state and growth concepts for the next century”, in Economy and Ecology: Towards Sustainable Development Eds ArchibugiFNijkampP, (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 73–87
9.
DawsonJ A LCatlingI, 1986, “Electronic road pricing in Hong Kong”Transportation Research20A129–134
10.
DodgsonJ, 1997, “Issues in evaluating the long-term global impacts of transport policy”International Journal of Environment and Pollution7293–304
11.
EmmerinkR H MNijkampPRietveldP, 1995, “Is congestion-pricing a first-best strategy in transport policy? A critical review of the arguments”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22581–602
12.
GoddardH C, 1997, “Sustainability, tradeable permits and the world's large cities: A new proposal for controlling vehicle emissions, congestion and urban decentralization with an application to Mexico City”International Journal of Environment and Pollution7357–374
13.
HahnR W, 1989, “Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: How the patient followed the doctor's orders”Journal of Economic Perspectives3 (2) 95–114
14.
KågesonP, 1993, “Getting the prices right: A European scheme for making transport pay its true costs”, report T and E 93/6, European Federation for Transport and the Environment, Rue de la Victoire 26, 1060 Brussels, Belgium
15.
KlaassenG A J, 1995Trading Sulfur Emission Reduction Commitments in Europe: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis PhD thesis, Faculty of Economics, Free University, Amsterdam
16.
KohW T HLeeD K C, 1994, “The vehicle quota system in Singapore: An assessment”Transportation Research28A (1) 31–47
17.
MontgomeryW D, 1972, “Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs”Journal of Economic Theory5395–418
18.
MorrisonS AWinstonC, 1989, “Enhancing the performance of the deregulated air transportation system”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics pp 61–122
19.
NijkampPUrsemT, 1995, “Market solutions for sustainable cities”, research memorandum 1995–40, Faculty of Economics, Free University, Amsterdam
20.
OECD, 1994Managing the Environment: The Role of Economic Instruments (OECD, Paris)
21.
OpschoorJ B, 1992, “Sustainable development, the economic process and economic analysis”, in Environment, Economy and Sustainable Development Ed. OpschoorJ B, (Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen) pp 25–52
22.
PhangS Y, 1993, “Singapore's motor vehicle policy: Review of recent changes and a suggested alternative”Transportation Research27A329–336
23.
PezzeyJ, 1993, “Sustainability: An interdisciplinary guide”Environmental Values1321–362
24.
RothengatterW, 1989, “Economic aspects”, in Transport Policy and the Environment: ECMT Ministerial SessionECMT/OECD, Paris, 147–176
25.
SheferDRietveldP, 1994, “Congestion and safety on highways: Towards an analytical model”, TRACE dp-T1 94–92, Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University Amsterdam, Burg. Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam
26.
SiebertH, 1982, “Nature as a life support system: Renewable resources and environmental disruption”Journal of Economics42133–142
27.
TietenbergT H, 1980, “Transferable discharge permits and the control of stationary source air pollution: A survey and synthesis”Land Economics56391–416
28.
TietenbergT H, 1994Environmental Economics and Policy (HarperCollins, New York)
29.
Van den BerghJ C J M, 1996Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Theory, Methods and Applications (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants)
30.
VerhoefE T, 1994, “External effects and social costs of road transport”Transportation Research28A (4) 273–287
31.
VerhoefE TNijkampPRietveldP, 1995a, “The economics of regulatory parking policies: The (im-)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation”Transportation Research29A141–156
32.
VerhoefE TNijkampPRietveldP, 1995b, “Second-best regulation of road transport externalities”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy29147–167
33.
VerhoefE TNijkampPRietveldP, 1996a, “The trade-off between efficiency, effectiveness and social feasibility of regulating road transport externalities”Transportation Planning and Technology19247–263
34.
VerhoefE TNijkampPRietveldP, 1996b, “Regulatory parking policies at the firm level”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy14385–406
35.
VerhoefE TNijkampPRietveldP, 1997, “The social feasibility of road pricing: A case study for the Randstad area”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy forthcoming
36.
WeitzmanM L, 1974, “Prices versus quantities”Review of Economic Studies41477–491