As an alternative to conventional monodirectional simulation tools, we introduce a preference-based performance-driven tool to generate computationally single-room designs based on requirements of daylight availability and distribution. To extend the applicability of this tool beyond single-room configurations, we have developed a rule-based system for the generation and modification of facade designs. We discuss the structure, capabilities, and limitations of these tools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuckleyM, 1988, “Multicrested evaluation: Measures, manipulation and meaning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design1555–64
2.
MahdaviA, 1993, “‘Open’ simulation environments: A ‘preference-based’ approach”, in Proceedings of CAAD Futures '93 (Elsevier: Amsterdam) pp 195–214
3.
MahdaviA, 1994, “From restraints to preferences: Reflections on evolving design support environments”, in Cybernetics and Systems '94 Ed. TrapplR, (World Scientific, Singapore) pp 531–538
4.
MahdaviABerberidou-KallivokaL, 1994, “GESTALT: A prototypical realization of an ‘open’ daylighting simulation environment”Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society23(2) 62–71
5.
MahdaviABerberidou-KallivokaL, 1995, “Recent advances in open daylighting simulation environments”, in Proceedings of the 1995 IESNA Annual ConferenceIlluminating Engineering Society of North America, 120 Well Street, New York, NY 10005–4001, pp 408–418
6.
SaatyT, 1994, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process”Interfaces24(6) 19–43
7.
SnyderJ, 1993, “A semantic modeling system for computer aided design”, in Advances in Computer Assisted Building Design Systems. 4th International Symposium on Systems Research, Information and Cybernetics Ed. PohlJ, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, pp 93–101
8.
SuterG, 1995, “Facades and spaces: A generative design support tool”, MS thesis, Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
