It can be inconvenient to use published land-price data with urban lattice data in analyses of urban activities, because such land-price data are limited to assigned plots in an urban area. This paper is an attempt to provide a model for interpolating the limited data. The proposed model is based on the concept of transportation costs in a wider sense than simple monetary costs. To improve the acceptability of the model, urban activities in each place are also incorporated into the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaikeH, 1972, “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle”Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory Eds PetronB NCsakF (Akadeniai kaido, Budapest) pp 267–281
2.
AkaikeH, 1974, “A new look at the statistical model identification”IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlAC19716–723
3.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BrighamE F, 1965, “The determinants of residential land values”Land Economics41325–334
5.
HeikkilaEGordonPKimJ IPeiserR BRichardsonH WDale-JohnsonD, 1989, “What happened to the CBD—distance gradient?: Land values in a policentric city”Environment and Planning A21221–232
6.
JohnsonM SRagasW R, 1987, “CBD land values and multiple externalities”Land Economics63337–347
7.
McDonaldJ FBowmanH W, 1979, “Land value functions: A reevaluation”Journal of Urban Economics625–41
8.
McDonaldJ FMcMillenD P, 1990, “Employment subcenters and land values in a polycentric urban area: The case of Chicago”Environment and Planning A221561–1574
9.
MohriMOhY, 1984, “Distribution characteristics of land value in residential areas”Papers of the Annual Conference of the City Planning Institute of Japan19451–456 (in Japanese)
10.
MohringH, 1961, “Land values and the measurement of highway benefits”Journal of Political Economy69236–249
11.
NakaharaHOhtaM, 1983, “A study on the change in urban land use through analysis on land value”Papers of the Annual Conference of the City Planning Institute of Japan18241–246 (in Japanese)
12.
OgawaHFujitaM, 1980, “Equilibrium land use patterns in a nonmonocentric city”Journal of Regional Science20455–475
13.
PapageorgiouG JCasettiE, 1971, “Spatial equilibrium residential land values in a multicenter setting”Journal of Regional Science11385–389
14.
PeiserR B, 1987, “The determinants of nonresidential urban land values”Journal of Urban Economics22340–360
15.
SwanH S, 1934, “Land values and city growth”Land Economics10188–201
16.
WakitaT, 1976Land Values in the Metropolitan Area (Taimeido, Tokyo) (in Japanese)
17.
WendtP F, 1957, “Theory of urban land values”Land Economics33228–240
18.
YeatesM, 1965, “Some factors affecting the spatial distribution of Chicago land values, 1910–1960”Economic Geography4157–70
