Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Group working involves a group of players collaborating to achieve a common goal, within which players may have individual goals, but be working towards a common aim. Because design problems are multifaceted, solving them requires the contribution of many players. In the design context, the aim is a group design which may involve a group of players discussing a design proposal. This paper is an examination of a design-based group activity and it is shown how collaboration in a design meeting informs design by means of change, resistance, and creation in the design. It is concluded that collaboration is an integral part of a cognitive model of design. Technology that supports collaboration and in particular this interaction process is essential for the design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bannon

L J

Schmidt

, 1991, “CSCW: Four characters in search of a context”, in Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work Eds Bowers

J M

Benford

S D

, (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 3–16.

Buchanan

D A

Huczynski

A A

, 1985 Organizational Behaviour (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

Chen

T S

Sanoff

, 1988, “The patient's view of the domain” Design Studies 9 40–52.

Coyne

, 1990, “Logic of design actions” Knowledge-Based Systems 3 242–257.

Edmonds

E A

, 1993, “Cybernetic serendipity re-visited”, in AI and Creativity Ed. Dartnall

, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) forthcoming.

Edmonds

E A

Jones

R M

, 1991, “Negotiation support in design”, in Preprints of Artificial Intelligence in Design Workshop of IJCAI'91 Eds Gero

Sudweeks

, University of Sydney, pp 93–108.

Katz

Tushman

, 1978, “Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation in an R&D setting” Organisational Behavior and Human Performance 23 139–162.

Kraut

Galegher

Egido

, 1988, “Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaborations”, in Computer-supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings Ed. Greif

, (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) pp 741–769.

Kunz

Rittel

, 1970, “Issues as elements of information systems in design”, WP-131, Institut für Grundlagen der Plannung, Stuttgart.

10.

McCall

Fischer

Morch

, 1990, “Supporting reflection-in-action in the Janus design environment”, in The Electronic Design Studio Eds McCullough

Mitchell

W J

Purcell

, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 247–259.

11.

Schiphorst

Calvert

Lee

Gaudet

, 1990, “Tools for interaction with the creative process of composition”, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, USA Association for Computing Machinery, 1133 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10026, pp 167–174.

12.

Schon

, 1983 The Reflective Practitioner (Basic Books, New York).

13.

Sherif

, 1936 The Psychology of Group Norms (Harper and Row, New York).

14.

Sherman

S J

Judd

C M

Park

, 1989, “Social cognition” Annual Review of Psychology 40 281–326.

15.

Whittaker

Brennan

S E

Clark

H H

, 1991, “Co-ordinating activity: An analysis of interaction in computer-supported co-operative work”, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, USA Association for Computing Machinery, 1133 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10026, pp 361–367.

A Study of Socially Shared Cognition in Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References