Zoning with binding regulations has only rarely been offered as a solution to problems of uncertainty and delay in the British planning system. Nevertheless there is merit in examining the French control system which appears in principle to be dedicated to the reduction of uncertainty both in timing and decision. Within the context of a general discussion of the merits of zoning and legalised policy the findings of case study research in the Lyon conurbation and an analysis of national development control statistics are presented. It is concluded that a legalised system of zoning does not reduce uncertainty and is often an inappropriate way of expressing policy, and that delay in the formal processing period, in negotiations before an application is lodged and in the prefect's duty to check decisions after they had been taken, is commonplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerMAsquithS, 1973Discretion and Welfare (Heinemann Educational Books, London)
2.
BoothP, 1985, “Decision making and decentralisation: development control in France”, TRP 60, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
3.
BoothP, 1989, “Rural development control in France: agreements between state and commune in Rhône and Haute-Loire”, TRP 83, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
4.
BoothP, 1989Rules, Discretion and Local Responsibility: Development Control Case Studies in the Urban Community of Lyon thesis to be presented for the degree of PhD, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
5.
BullD, 1980, “The anti-discretion movement in Britain”Journal of Social Welfare Law March issue, pp 65–84
6.
ChabanolJ, 1986, “Le Contentieux du nouveau droit de l'urbanisme”Les Cahiers de l'IATEURInstitut de l'Amènagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement, Université de Reims, Reims, 7 8277–286
7.
DananY-M, 1976Les Agences d'urbanisme d'agglomérationCentre de Recherche d'Urbanisme, Paris
8.
DavisK C, 1971Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
9.
DoE, 1987Development Control Statistics for England and Wales 1982–4Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1
10.
DupuyFThoenigJ-C, 1985L'Administration en miettes (Fayard, Paris)
11.
FlocktonC, 1983, “French local government reform and local planning”Local Government Studies965–11
GoodmanW IFreundE C, 1968Principles and Practice of Urban PlanningInternational City Managers' Association, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington DC 20036
14.
HamCHillM, 1984The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State (Wheatsheaf Books, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
15.
House of Commons, 1977Expenditure Committee (House of Commons) 1976–77 Report 8. Planning Procedures3 volumes (HMSO, London)
16.
JowellJ, 1973, “The legal control of administrative discretion”Public Law178–219
17.
LabetoulleD, 1982Le permis de construire (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris)
18.
McBrideD, 1979, “Planning delays and development control—a proposal for reform”Urban Law and Policy247–64
19.
MoseleyH, 1986, “Development control in New York City”The Planner72(12) 14–18
20.
MULT, 1984Recueil des informations statistiques sur l'urbanisme Ministère de l'Urbanisme, du Logement et des Transports, Paris
21.
MULT, 1985Recueil des informations statistiquesMinistère de l'Urbanisme, du Logement et des Transports, Paris
22.
PunterJ V, 1987, “The French system for the control of development”, Joint Centre for Land Development Studies, University of Reading and College of Estate Management, Reading
23.
ThoenigJ-C, 1986, “La décentralisation sur le terrain”Futuribles953–24
24.
ThomasDMinettJHopkinsSHamnettSFaludiABarrellD, 1983Flexibility and Commitment in Planning: A Comparative Study of Local Planning and Development in the Netherlands and England (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht)
25.
Town and Country Planning Act, 1971Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 78 (HMSO, London)
26.
WilsonI B, 1983, “The preparation of local plans in France”Town Planning Review54155–173
27.
WilsonI B, 1988, “French land-use planning in the 5th Republic”, Nijmeegse Pianologische Cahiers 27, Geografisch en Pianologisch Instituut, Katholieke Universiteit, Nijmegen
