Rules of composition can play a decisive role in understanding.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EarlC F, 1986, “Creating design worlds”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design13177–188
2.
GoodmanN, 1966The Structure of Appearance (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN)
3.
GoodmanN, 1968Languages of Art (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN)
4.
KnightT W, 1986aTransformations of Languages of Designs PhD dissertation, Graduate School Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
5.
KnightT W, 1986b, “Transformations of the meander motif on Greek geometric pottery”Design Computing129–67
6.
StinyG, 1975Pictorial and Formal Aspects of Shape and Shape Grammars (Birkhäuser, Basel)
7.
StinyG, 1976, “Two exercises in formal composition”Environment and Planning B3187–210
8.
StinyG, 1980a, “Introduction to shape and shape grammars”Environment and Planning B7343–351
9.
StinyG, 1980b, “Kindergarten grammars: Designing with Froebel's building gifts”Environment and Planning B7409–462
10.
StinyG, 1981, “A note on the description of designs”Environment and Planning B9257–267
11.
StinyG, 1982a, “Spatial relations and grammars”Environment and Planning B9113–114
12.
StinyG, 1982b, “Shapes are individuals”Environment and Planning B9359–367
13.
StinyG, 1985, “Computing with form and meaning in architecture”Journal of Architectural Education39(1) 7–19
14.
StinyG, 1986, “A new line on drafting systems”Design Computing15–19
15.
StinyG, forthcoming, “Designs and other descriptions”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
16.
StinyGGipsJ, 1972, “Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and”Information Processing711460–1465 (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
