Abstract
Some empirical explorations of the use of the Galois lattice approach are presented as an alternative to the more traditional algorithm used by the Q-analysis research community. The explorations are conducted in the context of three fields of study: prey—predator relations, social networks, and clinical psychiatry. It is suggested that the Galois lattice approach is superior to the traditional Q-analysis algorithm on grounds of accuracy, precision, and economy, and that data interpretation previously guided by the traditional algorithm should be reappraised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
