This note replies briefly to a recent criticism of the SIRO-PLAN/LUPLAN approach to land-use planning which claims it to be politically regressive, closed to public participation, and inadequately representative of the sort of planning problems it is intended to assist with.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssenR SIveJ R, 1982, “Exploiting structure in linear-programming formulations for land-use planning”Environment and Planning B9331–339
2.
BeerS, 1968, “The aborting corporate plan—a cybernetic account of the interface between planning and action” in Perspectives of Planning Ed. JantschE (OECD, Paris) pp 397–422
3.
BoothDJaffeM, 1978, “Generation and evaluation in structure planning: A review”Town Planning Review49445–458
4.
BrotchieJ FSharpeRToakleyA R, 1973, “Econometric model to aid in urban planning decisions”Journal of Urban Planning and Development9925–66
5.
CocksK DBairdI AAndersonJ R, 1983, “Application of the SIRO-PLAN planning method to the Cairns section of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park” Divisional Report 83/1, CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra
6.
CocksK DIveJ R, 1978, “Regional land use planning objectives” in Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales: A Study in Methods of Acquiring and Using Information to Analyse Regional Land Use OptionsVolume 1, Series Eds AustinM PCocksK D; Volume Ed. BasinskiJ J, CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 98–112
7.
CocksK DIveJ RDavisJ RBairdI A, 1983, “SIRO-PLAN and LUPLAN: An Australian approach to land-use planning. 1. The SIRO-PLAN land-use planning method”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10331–345
8.
CompagnoniP T, 1986, “An environmental planning method for Australian jurisdictions? Comments on the SIRO-PLAN/LUPLAN scheme”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design13335–344
9.
DavisJ RCocksK DIveJ R, 1985, “SIRO-PLAN: Improving the acceptability of a practical planning method”Planning Outlook2836–39
10.
FaludiA, 1986, “Flexibility in US zoning: A European perspective”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design13255–278
11.
HillM, 1968, “A goals-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans”Journal of the American Institute of Planners3419–28
12.
IveJ RCocksK D, 1983, “SIRO-PLAN and LUPLAN: An Australian approach to land-use planning. 2. The LUPLAN land-use planning package”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10347–355
