Recent studies have confirmed that store layout influences a shopper's movement, purchasing behavior, and preference. However, the systematic and quantitative description of the layout of retail stores has been discussed in few studies. The analytic method for describing a layout presented in this study, with other refined analysis capabilities, is based on a prespecified set of visual targets rather than each occupiable location such as a room. The systematic visibility description of a layout enables quantitative comparison of multiple locations within one layout and across multiple physical layouts. An observation exercise took place in a bookstore and the target-based systematic analysis showed, while nontarget-based systematic analysis did not show, that a product with high visibility from major paths, where shoppers tended to have more visual contact, had more product engagement. The research not only confirmed the impact of store layout but also showed how the layout affected shoppers' behavior.
ArcheaJ, 1977, “Place of architectural factors in behavioral theories of privacy”Journal of Social Issues33116–137
2.
BakerJGrewalDParasuramanA, 1994, “The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science22328–339
3.
BemmaorA CMouchouxD, 1991, “Measuring the short-term effect of in-store promotion and retail advertising on brand sales: A factorial experiment”Journal of Marketing Research28202–214
4.
BraaksmaJCookW, 1980, “Human orientation in transportation terminals”Transportation106189–203
5.
ChandonPHutchinsonJ WBradlowE TYoungS H, 2009, “Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase”Journal of Marketing731–17
6.
ChoiY K, 1999, “The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26241–250
7.
ChurchillADadaEDebarrosAWirasingheS, 2008, “Quantifying and validating measures of airport terminal wayfinding”Journal of Air Transport Management14151–158
8.
DaltonR C, 2003, “The secret is to follow your nose—route path selection and angularity”Environment and Behavior35107–131
9.
HallE, 1966The Hidden Dimension (Doubleday, New York)
10.
HaqSZimringC, 2003, “Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts”Environment and Behavior35132–160
11.
HillierBIidaS, 2005, “Network and psychological effects in urban movement”Spatial Information Theory, Proceedings3693475–490
12.
HillierBPennA, 1991, “Visible colleges: Structure and randomness in the place of discovery”Science in Context423–50
13.
HillierBPennAHansonJGrajewskiTXuJ, 1993, “Natural movement—or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design2029–66
14.
KentR L, 1989, “The role of mystery in preferences for shopping malls”Landscape Journal828–35
15.
KimY OPennA, 2004, “Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment”Environment and Behavior36483–504
16.
KuipersBTecuciD GStankiewiczB J, 2003, “The skeleton in the cognitive map”Environment and Behavior3581–106
17.
LamW H KTamM LWongS CWirasingheS C, 2003, “Wayfinding in the passenger terminal of Hong Kong International Airport”Journal of Air Transport Management973–81
18.
LuY, 2010, “Measuring the structure of visual fields in nursing units”Health Environments Research and Design Journal348–59
19.
LuYZimringC, 2012, “Can intensive care staff see their patients? An improved visibility analysis methodology”Environment and Behavior44861–876
NgC F, 2003, “Satisfying shoppers' psychological needs: From public market to cyber-mall”Journal of Environmental Psychology23439–455
23.
OmerIGoldblattR, 2007, “The implications of inter-visibility between landmarks on wayfinding performance: An investigation using a virtual urban environment”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems31520–534
24.
PeatrossF D, 2001, “A syntactic study of control in restrictive settings: Innovations in isovist methods”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28529–544
25.
PennA, 2003, “Space syntax and spatial cognition—or why the axial line?”Environment and Behavior3530–65
PennADesyllasJVaughanL, 1999, “The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26193–218
28.
PeponisJZimringCChoiY K, 1990, “Finding the building in wayfinding”Environment and Behavior22555–590
29.
PeponisJDaltonR CWinemanJDaltonN, 2004, “Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors' spatial behaviors in open plan exhibition settings”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31453–473
30.
PeponisJBafnaSBajajRBrombergJCongdonCRashidMWarmelsSZhangYZimringC, 2007, “Designing space to support knowledge work”Environment and Behavior39815–840
31.
PsarraS, 2009Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning (Routledge, London)
32.
RashidMKampschroerKWinemanJZimringC, 2006, “Spatial layout and face-to-face interaction in offices? A study of the mechanisms of spatial effects on face-to-face interaction”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33825–844
33.
SeoH BChoiY SZimringC, 2011, “Impact of hospital unit design for patient-centered care on nurses' behavior”Environment and Behavior43443–468
34.
SimonsonI, 1999, “The effect of product assortment on buyer preferences”Journal of Retailing75347–370
TurleyL WMillimanR E, 2000, “Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence”Journal of Business Research49193–211
38.
TurnerA, 2003, “Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30657–676
39.
TurnerAPennA, 2002, “Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: An investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29473–490
40.
TzortziK, 2004, “Building and exhibition layout: Sainsbury Wing compared with Castelvecchio”Architectural Research Quarterly8128–140
41.
UnderhillP, 2008Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping (Simon and Schuster, New York)
42.
van RompayT J LTanja-DijkstraKVerhoevenJ W Mvan EsA F, in press, “On store design and consumer motivation: Spatial control and arousal in the retail context”Environment and Behavior
43.
VrechopoulosA PO'KeefeR MDoukidisG ISiomkosG J, 2004, “Virtual store layout: An experimental comparison in the context of grocery retail”Journal of Retailing8013–22
44.
WakefieldK LBakerJ, 1998, “Excitement at the mall: Determinants and effects on shopping response”Journal of Retailing74515–539
45.
WinemanJ DPeponisJ, 2010, “Constructing spatial meaning”Environment and Behavior4286–109
