In this paper are reported the incorporation of (a) a selective reallocation capability and (b) a conditional reallocation capability into the LUPLAN land-use planning package. A selective reallocation capability allows the user to nominate a change of plan on part of the planning area and to view the implications of that change in policy-achievement terms prior to accepting the nominated change. A conditional reallocation capability allows the user to nominate the type of small change being sought in the plan and to learn whether any changes of that type are feasible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssenR SIveJ R, 1982, “Exploiting structure in linear-programming formulations for land-use planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design9331–339
2.
ChangS YBrillE DHopkinsL D, 1982, “Efficient random generation of feasible alternatives: A land use example”Journal of Regional Science22303–314
3.
DeissenbergC, 1977, “Man—machine interaction as an answer to the multiple goal problem” in Concepts and Tools of Computer-assisted Policy Analysis Ed. BosselH (Birkhäuser, Basel) pp 392–431
4.
GeoffrionA MDyerJ SFeinbergA, 1972, “An interactive approach for multi-criteria optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department”Management Science19357–368
5.
IveJ R, 1984, “LUPLAN: Microsoft BASIC, CP/M user's manual” Technical Memorandum 84/5, CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra
6.
IveJ RCocksK D, 1983, “SIRO-PLAN and LUPLAN: An Australian approach to land-use planning. 2. The LUPLAN land-use planning package”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10347–355
7.
NakayamaMTakeguchiTSanoM, 1983, “Interactive graphics for portfolio selection” in Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making Ed. HansenP (proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making) (Springer, Berlin) pp 280–289
