Abstract
The success of physical sciences led the social scientists to adopt the ‘mathematics’ that accompanied the development of physical sciences to be the mode of their disciplines and they developed the habit of dressing up their rather imprecise concepts in the language of numbers and calculus. Very few social scientists are aware that, if they are to imitate the procedures of modern physics, they must begin with a critical account of the quantitative notions and the means adopted for collecting and measuring them. We can follow the procedures of physical sciences if we have the equivalent of the so-called ‘physics’ of physical sciences which provides appropriate dimension-conversion formulae for the aggregation of measurements, etc. In the absence of an elaborated ‘physics’, social scientists have to restrict themselves, at least at the very beginning, to the qualitative aspect of the system under consideration. A way to do this is to confine their measurements to a ‘homogeneous set of logical values’, in particular, the set {true, false}. In other words, they should put ‘structure before measure’. This paper presents a method of constructing the structure of an object—feature relation based on the so-called verbal descriptions of a phenomenon. The object—feature map λ
The mapping X extracts the features common to a set of objects
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
