In the hope of improving the performance of public participation programs in practice, this paper applies a perspective drawn from the recent literature on implementation assessment to the design of such programs. Viewing participation not only as a way of structuring the relationship among groups, but as itself an object of varying interests and perceptions, the paper proposes the concept of a strategy of participation which implies the need to take into account the likely actions and points of view that the actors might take vis-à-vis the participation program. The paper presents a framework whereby alternative participatory strategies may be designed and methods selected. This framework is based on a set of six decision variables: the type of issue; goals and objectives; definition of the public; the power relationship; the stage in the planning process; and types of resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltermanR, 1982“Implementation analysis in urban and regional planning: Toward a research agenda” in Planning Theory: Prospects for the 1980's Eds HealeyPMcDougallGThomasM (Pergamon Press, New York) pp 225–249
2.
AltermanRChurchmanALaw-YoneH, 1981A Guide to Public Participation in PlanningCenter for Urban and Regional Studies, Technion, Haifa (in Hebrew, with an English abstract)
3.
AltermanRHarrisDHillM, 1983“The impact of public participation on planning: The case of the Derbyshire structure plan”Town Planning Review (forthcoming)
4.
ArnsteinS R, 1969“A ladder of citizen participation”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35216–224
BardachE, 1977The Implementation Game: How a Bill Becomes Law (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
7.
BlowersA, 1980The Limits of Power: The Politics of Local Planning Policy (Pergamon Press, New York)
8.
BoadenNGoldsmithMHamptonWStringerP, 1980“Planning and participation in practice: A study of public participation in structure planning”Progress in Planning131–102
9.
BurkeE C, 1968“Citizen participation strategies”Journal of the American Institute of Planners34287–294
10.
CarmonNHillMAltermanR, 1981“Multi-group integrated evaluation: a synthesis of approaches to the evaluation of broad-aim programs” working paper, Samuel Neaman Institute, Technion, Israel
11.
CheckowayBVan TilJ, 1978“What do we know about citizen participation? A selective review of research” in Citizen Participation in America Ed. LangtonS (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 25–42
12.
DelbecqA LVan de VenA HGustafsonD H, 1975“A group process model for problem identification and program planning”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science7466–492
13.
DennisN, 1972Public Participation and Planners' Blight (Faber and Faber, London)
14.
EdwardsG CIII, 1980Implementing Public Policy (Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC)
15.
FagenceM, 1977Citizen Participation in Planning (Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY)
16.
FriedmannJ, 1973Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning (Anchor Books, Garden City, New York)
17.
GlassJ J, 1979“Citizen participation in planning: The relationship between objectives and techniques”Journal of the American Planning Association45180–189
18.
GodschalkDStiftelB, 1981“Making waves: Public participation in state water planning”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science17(4) 597–614
19.
GordonW J J, 1961Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity (Harper and Row, New York)
20.
HeapD, 1969An Outline of Planning Law (Sweet and Maxwell, London)
21.
HirshhornL, 1980“Scenario writing: A developmental approach”Journal of the American Planning Association46172–183
22.
HoweEKaufmanJ, 1981“The values of contemporary American planners”Journal of the American Planning Association47266–278
23.
LangtonS (Ed.), 1978a“Citizen participation in America: Current reflections on the state of the art” in Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 1–12
24.
LangtonS (Ed.), 1978b“What is citizen participation?” in Citizen Participation in America (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 13–24
25.
LarsonJ S, 1980Why Government Programs Fail: Improving Policy Implementation (Praeger, New York)
26.
McAuslanP, 1980The Ideologies of Planning Law (Pergamon Press, New York)
27.
MilbrathL W, 1981“Citizen surveys as citizen participation mechanisms”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science17478–496
28.
MontjoyRO'TooleL JJr, 1979“Toward a theory of policy implementation: An organization perspective”Public Administration Review39465–476
29.
PalumboD JHarderM H, 1981Implementing Public Policy (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
30.
PressmanJ LWildavskyA, 1973Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland, etc. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
31.
PriscoliJ D, 1978“Implementing public involvement programs in federal agencies” in Citizen Participation in America Ed. LangtonS (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 97–108
32.
RavetzA, 1980Remarking Cities: Contradictions of the Recent Built Environment (Croom Helm, London)
33.
ReinM, 1980“Comprehensive program evaluation” in Evaluation Research and Practice: Comparative and International Perspectives Eds LevineR ASolomonM AHellsternG MWollmannH (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA) pp 132–148
34.
ReinMRabinovitzF, 1978“Implementation: A theoretical perspective” in American Politics and Public Policy Eds BurnhamW DWeinbergM W (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 307–335
35.
RobinsonI MBaerW CBanerjeeT KFlachsbartP G, 1975“Trade-off games” in Behavioral Research Methods in Environmental Design Ed. MichelsonW (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA) pp 29–116
36.
RosenbaumN M, 1976Citizen Involvement in Land Use Governance (The Urban Institute, Washington, DC)
37.
RosenbaumN M (Ed.), 1980Citizen Participation: Models and Methods of EvaluationCenter for Responsive Government, Washington, DC
38.
RosenbaumW P, 1978“Public involvement as reform and ritual: The development of federal participation programs” in Citizen Participation in America Ed. LangtonS (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 81–96
39.
RosenerJ B, 1978a“Matching method to purpose: The challenge of planning citizen participation activities” in Citizen Participation in America Ed. LangtonS (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 109–122
40.
RosenerJ B, 1978b“Citizen participation: Can we measure its effectiveness?”Public Administration Review38457–463
41.
RosenerJ B, 1981“User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science17583–596
42.
SabatierPMazmanianD, 1980“The implementation of public policy: A framework for analysis”Policy Studies Journal8538–559
43.
SanoffH, 1979Design Games (William Kaufman, Los Altos, CA)
44.
SusskindLElliottM, 1981“Learning from citizen participation and citizen action in Western Europe”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science17497–517
45.
TuroffM, 1975“The policy Delphi” in The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications Eds IinstoneH ATuroffM (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) pp 84–101
46.
US FHA, 1976Effective Citizen Participation in Transportation Planning, Volumes I and II US Federal Highway Administration (US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC)
47.
WandersmanA, 1979“User participation: A study of types of participation, effects, mediators and individual differences”Environment and Behavior11185–208
48.
WhiteC REdnerS M, 1981“Participation in neighborhood organizations”Journal of Community Action148–52
49.
WholeyJ S, 1979Evaluation: Promise and Performance (The Urban Institute, Washington, DC)
50.
YinR K, 1975“Goals for citizen involvement: some possibilities and some evidence” paper 5365, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
