This paper examines neighborhood responses to the business cycle of the decade 1999–2009. Utilizing a quality-of-life (QoL) framework to profile neighborhoods in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina, we investigate with a Markov-chain methodology how the process of change was impacted by short-term economic fluxes including the greatest downturn since the Great Depression. Results indicate that neighborhoods falling within the lowest QoL category exhibited the greatest boost in relative upward mobility in the boom leading up to the recession. Many of these same neighborhoods reverted back to their previous conditions once the recession hit. Overall, neighborhood resilience is context dependent and so is neighborhood response to exogenous shocks. The same patterns did not hold true when the QoL index was decomposed into its four comprising dimensions.
BickenbachFBodeE, 2003, “Evaluating the Markov property in studies of economic convergence”International Regional Science Review266363–392
2.
BoskerM, 2009, “The spatial evolution of regional GDP disparities in the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ Europe”Papers in Regional Science883–27
3.
BoskerMKrugellW, 2008, “Regional income evolution in South Africa after apartheid”Journal of Regional Science48493–523
4.
BruecknerJ KRosenthalS S, 2009, “Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: Will America's future downtowns be rich?”The Review of Economics and Statistics91725–743
5.
CantorDLandK C, 1985, “Unemployment and crime rates in the post-World War II United States: A theoretical and empirical analysis”American Sociological Review50317–332
6.
ClarkW A V, 1965, “Markov chain analysis in geography: An application to the movement of rental housing areas”Annals of the Association of American Geographers55351–359
7.
ColenC GGeroniniusA TPhippsM G, 2006, “Getting a piece of the pie? The economic boom of the 1990s and declining teen birth rates in the United States”Social Science and Medicine631531–1545
8.
CookeJZarkinG A, 1985, “Crime and the business cycle”The Journal of Legal Studies14115–128
9.
CookeTMarchantS, 2006, “The changing intrametropolitan location of high-poverty neighbourhoods in the US, 1990–2000”Urban Studies431971–1989
10.
DelmelleE CThillJ-CFurusethOLuddenT, 2013, “Trajectories of multidimensional neighbourhood quality of life change”Urban Studies50923–941
11.
DissartJ-CDellerS, 2000, “Quality of life in the planning literature”Journal of Planning Literature15135–161
12.
EllenI GO'ReganK, 2008, “Reversal of fortunes? Lower-income urban neighbourhoods in the US in the 1990s”Urban Studies45845–869
13.
GalsterG, 2001, “On the nature of neighbourhood”Urban Studies382111–2124
14.
GalsterGMincyRTobinM, 1997, “The disparate racial neighborhood impacts of metropolitan economic restructuring”Urban Affairs Review32797–824
15.
GalsterGQuerciaRCortesA, 2000, “Identifying neighborhood thresholds: An empirical exploration”Housing Policy Debate11701–732
16.
GalsterGQuerciaRCortesARibM, 2003, “The fortunes of poor neighborhoods”Urban Affairs Review39205–227
17.
GalsterGTatianPAccordinoJ, 2006, “Targeting investments for neighborhood revitalization”Journal of the American Planning Association74457–474
GarrettT AOttL S, 2008, “Local crime and local business cycles”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series
20.
GilbertG, 1972, “Two Markov models of neighborhood housing turnover”Environment and Planning4133–146
21.
GrigsbyW, 1963Housing Markets and Public Policy (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
22.
GrigsbyWBaratzMGalsterGMaclennanD, 1987The Dynamics of Neighborhood Change and Decline (Pergamon, Oxford)
23.
HackworthJ, 2001, “Inner-city real estate investment, gentrification, and economic recession in New York City”Environment and Planning A33863–880
24.
HammondG W, 2003, “Metropolitan/non-metropolitan divergence: A spatial Markov chain approach”Papers in Regional Science83543–563
25.
HoytH, 1933One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
26.
JargowskyP A, 2003Stunning Progress, Hidden Problems: The Dramatic Decline of Concentrated Poverty in the 1990sLiving Cities Census Series, Center for Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
27.
LaskaS BSeamanJ MMcSeveneyD R, 1982, “Inner-city reinvestment: Neighborhood characteristics and spatial patterns over time”Urban Studies19155–165
28.
LeeJ CStaffJ, 2007, “When work matters: The varying impact of adolescent work intensity on high school drop-out”Sociology of Education80158–178
29.
Le GalloJ, 2004, “Space–time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov-chains approach”International Regional Science Review27138–164
30.
Metropolitan Studies Group, 2010, “Charlotte neighborhood quality of life study, Charlotte”, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
31.
MuthR, 1969Cities and Housing (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
32.
OdlandJ, 1979, “A conditional-probability approach to the development of spatial pattern”Environment and Planning A11313–326
33.
OngP MSpencerJYontaMNelsonTMillerDHeinty-MackoffJ, 2003, “The economic cycle and Los Angeles neighborhoods, 1987–2001”, report to the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation, submitted by the Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, UCLA School of Public Policy and Social Research, Los Angeles, CA
34.
QuerciaRGalsterG, 2000, “Threshold effects and neigborhood change”Journal of Planning Education and Research20146–162
35.
RosenthalS S, 2008, “Old homes, externalities, and poor neighborhoods. A model of urban decline and renewal”Journal of Urban Economics63816–840
36.
SmithN, 1979, “Toward a theory of gentrification. A back to the city movement by capital, not people”Journal of the American Planning Association45538–548
37.
SmithN, 1996The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (Routledge, New York)
38.
WilliamsSGalsterGVermaN, 2013, “The disparate neighborhood impacts of the great recession: Evidence from Chicago”Urban Geography34737–763
