Longitudinal microdata on the Swedish population, 1990–2006, are used to examine the numbers and characteristics of internal return migrants, emphasizing Sweden's three largest cities. Our study indicates that metropolitan regions are gaining population from net return migration, which thus carries people in the same direction as does most internal migration. Evidence also indicates that returnees to metropolitan regions are more likely to stay permanently than are migrants returning elsewhere. Furthermore, return migrants to metropolitan regions are distinguished from other return migrants in ways that emphasize the advantages of these regions, higher incomes and levels of education being among the pronounced attributes. However, metro-bound returnees do not have as many children as do other return migrants.
BellDNFKirwanFX, 1979, “Return migration in a Scottish context”Regional Studies13101–111
2.
CarlssonFJohanssonMPerssonL-OTegsjöB, 1996, “Creating labour markets and employment zones”, in Extending the Reach: Essays on Differing Mobility Patterns in Sweden Eds JohnassonMPerssonL-O, (SIR Östersund) pp 33–52
3.
DaVanzoJ, 1976, “Differences between return and nonreturn migration: An econometric analysis”International Migration Review1013–27
4.
DaVanzoJ, 1981, “Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capital”Population and Environment445–73
5.
DaVanzoJ, 1983, “Repeat migration in the United States: Who moves back and who moves on?”The Review of Economics and Statistics65552–559
6.
DaVanzoJSMorrisonPA, 1981, “Return and other sequences of migration in the United States”Demography1885–101
7.
DienelH-LJainAReimDSchmithalsJThiesS, 2006Rückwanderung als dynamisher faktor für ostdeutsche städte (nexus, Berlin)
8.
EldridgeHT, 1963, “The influence of return migration upon rates of net migration”Bulletin of the International Statistical InstituteXL321–349
9.
EldridgeHT, 1965, “Primary, secondary, and return migration in the United States 1955–60”Demography2444–455
10.
Fuchs-SchündelnNSchündeinM, 2009, “Who stays, who goes, who returns? East-west migration within Germany since reunification”Economics of Transition17703–738
11.
GeschwindH, 1957, “Inrikes omflyttning 1951–1955”Statistical Review New Series6607–614
12.
GoldsteinS, 1958Patterns of Mobility 1910–1950: The Norristown Study (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
13.
GoldsteinS, 1964, “The extent of repeated migration: An analysis based on the Danish population register”Journal of the American Statistical Association591121–1132
14.
GrantEKVanderkampJ, 1984, “A descriptive analysis of the incidence and nature of repeat migration within Canada 1968–71”Canadian Studies in Population1161–78
15.
HägerstrandT, 1949, “Flyttningarna till och från Simrishamn under 1900-talet”, in Simrishamn med omland Ed. NelsonH, (Gleerup, Lund) pp 74–111
16.
HuntJ, 2004, “Are migrants more skilled than non-migrants? Repeat, return, and same-employer migrants”Canadian Journal of Economics37830–849
17.
JauhiainenJS, 2009, “Will the retiring baby boomers return to rural periphery?”Journal of Rural Studies2525–34
18.
KauhanenMTervoH, 2002, “Who moves to depressed regions? An analysis of migration streams in Finland in the 1990s”International Regional Science Review25200–218
19.
LeeAS, 1974, “Return migration in the United States”International Migration Review8283–300
20.
LewickaM, 2011, “Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?”Journal of Environmental Psychology31207–230
21.
LinJPLiawKL, 2000, “Labor migrations in Taiwan: Characterization and interpretation based on the data of the 1990 census”Environment and Planning A321689–1709
22.
LongLHHansenKA, 1975, “Trends in return migration to the South”Demography12601–614
23.
LongLHHansenKA, 1977, “Interdivisional primary, return, and repeat migration”Public Data Use53–10
24.
LundholmE, 2012, “Returning home? Migration to birthplace among migrants after age 55”Population, Space and Place1874–84
25.
Martí-HennebergJ, 2005, “Empirical evidence of regional population concentration in Europe, 1870–2000”Population, Space and Place11269–281
26.
MillerE, 1973, “Return and nonreturn in-migration”Growth and Change43–9
27.
NewboldKB, 1996, “Income, self-selection, and return and onward interprovincial migration in Canada?”Environment and Planning A281019–1034
28.
NewboldKB, 1997, “Race and primary, return, and onward interstate migration”The Professional Geographer491–14
29.
NewboldKB, 2001, “Counting migrants and migrations: Comparing lifetime and fixed-interval return and onward migration”Economic Geography7723–40
30.
NewboldKB, 2005, “Spatial scale, return and onward migration, and the Long–Boertlein index of repeat migration”Papers in Regional Science84281–290
31.
NewboldKB, 2008, “Interprovincial migration and retirement income transfers among Canada's older population: 1996–2001”Environment and Planning A401501–1516
32.
NewboldKBBellM, 2001, “Return and onwards migration in Canada and Australia: Evidence from fixed interval data”International Migration Review351157–1184
33.
NewboldKBCicchinoS, 2007, “Inter-regional return and onwards migration in Canada: Evidence based on a micro-regional analysis”Canadian Journal of Regional Science30211–226
34.
NewboldKBLiawK-L, 1994, “Return and onward interprovincial migration through economic boom and bust in Canada, from 1976–81 to 1981–86”Geographical Analysis26228–245
35.
NiedomyslT, 2011, “How migration motives change over migration distance: Evidence on variations across socioeconomic and demographic groups”Regional Studies45843–855
36.
NiedomyslTAmcoffJ, 2011, “Why return migrants return: Survey evidence on motives for internal return migration in Sweden”Population, Space and Place17656–673
37.
PekkalaS, 2003, “Migration flows in Finland: Regional differences in migration determinants and migrant types”International Regional Science Review26466–482
38.
RavensteinEG, 1885, “The laws of migration”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society48167–235
39.
RosenbaumH, 1993, “Selectivity among various types of inter-provincial migrants, Canada 1976–1981”Canadian Studies in Population2085–106
40.
SFS, 1991Folkbokföringslag SFS1991:481, Ministry of Finance, Stockholm
41.
Statistics Sweden, 1936, Folkräkningen den 31 december 1930, Volume II, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm
42.
StillwellJCollA García, 2000, “Inter-provincial migration of the Spanish workforce in 1988 and 1994”Regional Studies34693–711
43.
StjernströmO, 1998Flytta nära, långt bort: De sociala nätverkens betydelse för val av bostadsortDepartment of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University
44.
StockdaleA, 2006, “Migration: Pre-requisite for rural economic regeneration?”Journal of Rural Studies22354–366
45.
WangWWFanCC, 2006, “Success or failure: Selectivity and reasons of return migration in Sichuan and Anhui, China”Environment and Planning A38939–958
46.
VanderkampJ, 1972, “Return migration: Its significance and behavior”Economic Inquiry10460–465
47.
von ReichertC, 2001, “Returning and new Montana migrants: Socio-economic and motivational differences”Growth and Change32447–465
48.
WilsonBABerryEHToneyMBKimYTCromartieJB, 2009, “A panel based analysis of the effects of race/ethnicity and other individual-level characteristics at leaving on returning”Population Research and Policy Review28405–428
