This paper tests for excessive employment agglomeration among twenty southern California manufacturing industry clusters using two methods claiming to control for the natural and planned geography constraining industrial location generally. We find broad consistency across the alternative tests; although fewer industry clusters test statistically significant for agglomeration or dispersion using the weighted kernel density estimator than when we use the more established weighted case-control approach. Similarly, the observed values for the former statistic test significant over a subset of the spatial scales over which the case-control method tests significant.
AgarwalAGiulianoGRedfearnC, 2012, “Strangers in our midst: The usefulness of exploring polycentricity”Annals of Regional Science48433–450
2.
AldrichHKallebergAMardsenPCassellJ, 1989, “In pursuit of evidence: Sampling procedures for locating new businesses”Journal of Business Venturing4367–386
3.
BaileyTGatrellC, 1995Interactive Spatial Data Analysis (Pearson, Harlow, Essex)
4.
BaldwinJBrownWRigbyD, 2010, “Agglomeration economies: Microdata panel estimates from Canadian manufacturing”Journal of Regional Science50915–934
5.
BarriosSBertinelliLStroblE, 2006, “Geographic concentration and establishment scale: An extension using panel data”Journal of Regional Science46733–746
6.
BreauSRigbyDL, 2006, “Is there really an export wage premium? A case study of Los Angeles using matched employee-employer data”International Regional Science Review29297–310
7.
BurgerMvan OortFvan der KnaapB, 2008, “A treatise on the geographical scale of agglomeration externalities and the modifiable areal unit problem”, Report Series ERS-2008-076-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam
8.
ChakravortySKooJLallSV, 2005, “Do localization economies matter in cluster formation? Questioning the conventional wisdom with data from Indian metropolises”Environment and Planning A37331–353
9.
DavisM, 1997, “Sunshine and the open shop: Ford and Darwin in 1920s Los Angeles”Antipode29356–382
10.
DavisSJHaltiwangerJSchuhS, 1996, “Small business and job creation: Dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts”Small Business Economics8297–315
11.
DigglePChetwyndA, 1991, “Second-order analysis of spatial clustering for inhomogenous populations”Biometrics471155–1163
12.
DurantonGOvermanH, 2005, “Testing for localization using micro-geographic data”Review of Economic Studies721077–1106
13.
DurantonGOvermanH, 2008, “Exploring the detailed location patterns of UK manufacturing industries using microgeographic data”Journal of Regional Science48213–243
14.
FeserEBergmanE, 2000, “National industry cluster templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis”Regional Studies341–19
15.
FeserESweeneyS, 2000, “A test for the coincident economic and spatial clustering of business enterprises”Journal of Geographical Systems2349–373
16.
FeserESweeneyS, 2002a, “Spatially binding linkages in manufacturing product chains”, in Global Competition and Local Networks Eds McNaughtonRGreenM, (Ashgate, Burlington, VT) pp 111–130
17.
FeserESweeneyS, 2002b, “Theory, methods, and a cross-metropolitan comparison of business clustering”, in Industrial Location Economics Ed. McCannP, (Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 222–259
18.
FigueiredoOGuimarãesPWoodwardD, 2009, “Localization economies and establishment size: Was Marshall right after all?Journal of Economic Geography9853–868
19.
FogelsonRM, 1967The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850–1930 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
FunderburgRBoarnetM, 2008, “Agglomeration potential: The spatial scale of industry linkages in the Southern California economy”Growth and Change3924–57
21.
GiulianoGSmallKA, 1991, “Subcenters in the Los Angeles region”Regional Science and Urban Economics21163–182
22.
GiulianoGRedfearnCAgarwalALiCZhuangD, 2007, “Employment concentrations in Los Angeles, 1980–2000”Environment and Planning A392935–2957
23.
GiulianoGRedfearnCAgarwalAHeS, 2012, “Network accessibility and employment centres”Urban Studies4977–95
24.
HolmesTJStevensJJ, 2002, “Geographic concentration and establishment scale”The Review of Economics and Statistics84682–690
25.
KolkoJNeumarkD, 2008, “Changes in the location of employment and ownership: Evidence from California”Journal of Regional Science4817–743
26.
LafourcadeMMionG, 2007, “Concentration, agglomeration and the size of plants”Regional Science and Urban Economics3746–68
27.
LotchinRW, 1992Fortress California, 1910–1961 (Oxford University Press, New York)
28.
MartinRSunleyP, 2003, “Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?”Journal of Economic Geography35–35
29.
NeumarkDWallBZhangJ, 2011, “Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series”Review of Economics and Statistics9316–29
30.
NicolaidesB, 2001, “The quest for independence: Workers in the suburbs”, in Metropolis in the Making: Los Angeles in the 1920s Eds SittonTDeverellW, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 77–95
31.
PhelpsN, 2004, “Clusters, dispersion and the spaces in between: For an economic geography of the banal”Urban Studies41971–989
32.
PhelpsNOzawaT, 2003, “Contrasts in agglomeration: Proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared”Progress in Human Geography27583–604
33.
PiconeGRidleyDZandbergenP, 2009, “Distance decreases with differentiation: Strategic agglomeration by retailers”International Journal of Industrial Organization27463–473
34.
PorterME, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York)
35.
PorterME, 1998, “Clusters and the new economics of competition”Harvard Business Review November–December, 77–90
36.
PorterME, 2000, “Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy”Economic Development Quarterly1415–34
37.
RosenthalSStrangeW, 2003, “Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration”The Review of Economics and Statistics85377–393
38.
ScottAJ, 1988aMetropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
39.
ScottAJ, 1988bNew Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe (Pion, London)
40.
ScottAJ, 1990, “The technopoles of Southern California”Environment and Planning A221575–1605
41.
ScottAJ, 1993Technopolis: High Technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
42.
ScottAJ, 1996, “High-technology industrial development in the San Fernando Valley and Ventura County: Observations on economic growth and the evolution of urban form”, in The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century Eds ScottASojaE, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 276–310
43.
SilvermanB, 1986Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall, New York)
44.
SivitanidouR, 1996, “Do office-commercial firms value access to service employment centers? A hedonic value analysis within polycentric Los Angeles”Journal of Urban Economics4025–149
45.
SivitanidouRSivitanidesP, 1995, “The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence”Journal of Regional Science35391–415
46.
SweeneySFeserE, 1998, “Plant size and clustering of manufacturing activity”Geographical Analysis3045–64
47.
SweeneySFeserE, 2004, “Business location and spatial externalities: Tying concepts to measures”, in Spatially Integrated Social Science Eds GoodchildMJanelleD, (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 239–262
48.
SweeneySKontyK, 2005, “Robust point-pattern inference from spatially censored data”Environment and Planning A37141–159
