The paper explores change in shipping nexuses via the Canadian example. Two dimensions of this institutional framework are contrasted. On one hand, the industry segment of Canadian-flag vessels operate under a regime that reserves domestic trade to national carriers. On the other hand, more recent initiatives seek to develop long-term connectivity with international shipping networks through a trade corridor planning approach. Derived from new institutionalisms and cognitive policy analysis, the interpretation of the case studies is achieved through a conceptual framework that emphasises the influence of representations. The paper underlines how actors refer to ideational frameworks to build credibility when working towards desired institutional change or reacting to proposed amended policies.
Algoma Central Corporation, 2010bAlgoma Central Corporation Announces Lake Freighter Construction Contract press release, 21 December, http://www.algonet.com/
Department of Finance Canada, 2010Government of Canada Announces New Tariff Measures for Ships for a More Competitive Canadian Economy press release 2010–089, 1 October, http://www.fin.gc.ca/n10/10–089-eng.asp
13.
FullerC, 2010, “Crisis and institutional change in urban governance”Environment and Planning A421121–1137
14.
Government of Canada, 2009National Policy Framework for Strategic Gateways and Trade Corridors Catalogue Number: T22–136/2009E
GuyELapointeF, 2009, “Integrating short sea shipping to supply chains: The performance of the coastal trading license system”, in The Impact of Volatility on Canada's Supply Chains and Transportation—Proceedings 44th Annual Conference of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum pp 265–279
17.
GuyELapointeF, 2010a, “Building value into transport chains: The challenges of multi-policies”, in Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors Eds HallPMcCallaRComtoisCSlackB, (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 193–206
18.
GuyELapointeF, 2010bPolitiques publiques pour le transport maritime sur le Saint-Laurent: Cohésion des objectifs et mesures—Public Policy to Transportation on the St. Lawrence: Cohesion of Goals and Means (Transport Québec, Québec)
19.
GuyEUrliB, 2009Analyse comparative des mesures d'intervention publique en support au transport maritime—Comparative Analysis of Shipping PoliciesTransports Québec, Québec
20.
HallPTaylorR, 1996, “Political science and the three new institutionalisms”Political Studies44936–957
21.
HayC, 2004, “Taking ideas seriously in explanatory political analysis”British Journal of Politics and International Relations6142–149
22.
IBI Group, 2008Étude sur le corridor de commerce Saint-Laurent Grands Lacs — Study on the St. Lawrence Great Lakes Trade CorridorIBI Group, Montreal
23.
IrchaM, 2010, “Trade corridors and gateways: An evolving national transportation plan”, in Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors Eds HallPMcCallaRComtoisCSlackB, (Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey) pp 221–234
24.
KingdonJ, 1984Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Little, Brown, Boston, MA) Maritime Magazine 2011, “Seaway marine transport announces the next generation of Great Lakes bulk carriers” 597–10
MullerP, 1984Le technocrate et le paysan: The Technocrat and the Farmer (Éditions Économie et Humanisme, Paris)
27.
MullerP, 1989Airbus l'ambition européenne: Airbus a European Ambition (L'Harmattan, Paris)
28.
MullerP, 2005, “Esquisse d'une théorie du changement dans l'action publique—structures, acteurs et cadres cognitifs”Revue Française de Science Politique55155–187
29.
MullerP, 2009Les politiques publiques—Public Policy8th edition (first edition1990) (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris)
30.
SchmidtV, 2008, “Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse”Annual Review of Political Science11303–326
31.
SchmidtV, 2010, “Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’”European Political Science Review21–25
32.
SchoenbergerE, 1997The Cultural Crisis of the Firm (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ)
SurelY, 2000, “The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making”Journal of European Public Policy7495–512
35.
TorfingJ, 2001, “Path dependent Danish welfare reforms: The contribution of the new institutionalisms to understanding evolutionary change”Scandinavian Political Studies24277–309
36.
UrliBGuyELangevinA, 2011Application des outils de l'aide à la décision multicritère au développement de politiques de transport maritime—Application of Mulcriteria Analysis to the Development Maritime Transportation PoliciesTransport Québec, Québec
