This paper explores the changing role and place of handicrafts in contemporary rural development processes. Building on fieldwork conducted in four settlements in northern Thailand and Vietnam, we discuss how a traditional sector is being reshaped under the forces of globalisation and what this means for the character of rural livelihoods. This empirical analysis permits us to reflect on wider areas of debate within development and economic geography. By examining the spatialities of production, we explore how the ‘place’ of handicrafts in the settlements is being reshaped. We show how, although handicraft production retains an image of being part of a traditional sector built around local skills and inputs, in reality the activities have become deterritorialised and are increasingly spatially dispersed. Nonetheless, handicraft production remains economically and socially embedded and is helping to sustain village economies both in situ and in distant locations.
AnhD N, 2005Internal Migration: Opportunities and Challenges for the Renovations and Development in Vietnam (VAPEC, The Gioi Publisher, Hanoi).
3.
ArnoldDHewisonK, 2005, “Exploitation in global supply chains: Burmese migrants workers in Mae Sot, Thailand”Journal of Contemporary Asia35319–340.
4.
AyuthayaASNFuhsF WSoonthornpasuchS, 1979, “Village Chiang Mai: Social and economic conditions of a rural population in Northern Thailand”, Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
5.
BowieK A, 1992, “Unraveling the myth of the subsistence economy: Textile production in nineteenth century Northern Thailand”Journal of Asian Studies51797–823.
6.
BryantJ, 2002, “Patrilines, patrilocality and fertility decline in Viet Nam”Asia-Pacific Population Journal17111–128.
7.
DerconS, 2009, “Rural poverty: Old challenges in new contexts”World Bank Research Observer241–28.
8.
DickenPMalmbergA, 2001, “Firms in territories: A relational perspective”Economic Geography77345–364.
9.
DixonC, 1999The Thai Economy: Uneven Development and Internationalisation (Routledge, London).
10.
DixonC, 2003, “Developmental lessons of the Vietnamese transitional economy”Progress in Development Studies3287–306.
11.
EllisF, 2008, “The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries”Journal of Agricultural Economics51289–302.
12.
EvansH E, 1992, “A virtuous circle model of rural—urban development: Evidence from a Kenyan small town and its hinterland”Journal of Development Studies28640–667.
13.
EvansH ENgauP, 1991, “Rural—urban relations, household income diversification, and agricultural productivity”Development and Change22519–545.
14.
GlassmanJ, 2004Thailand at the Margins: Internationalization of the State and the Transformation of Labour (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
15.
GoughK V, 2010, “Continuity and adapatability of home-based enterprises: A longitudinal study from Accra, Ghana”International Development Planning Review3245–70.
16.
GoughK VAgergaardJFoldNMøller-JensenL, 2010, “Conceptualising and performing comparison of rural—urban dynamics”, in Rural—Urban Dynamics: Livelihoods, Mobility and Markets in African and Asian Frontiers Eds AgergaardJFoldNGoughK V (Routledge, London) pp 9–22.
17.
HessM, 2004, “‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness”Progress in Human Geography28165–186.
18.
JDR2007, “Vietnam Development Report 2008: Social protection”, Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam consultative group meeting, Hanoi.
19.
JessopB, 2001, “Regulationist and autopoieticist reflections on Polanyi's account of market economies and the market society”New Political Economy6213–232.
20.
JonesA, 2008, “Beyond embeddedness: Economic practices and the invisible dimensions of transnational business activity”Progress in Human Geography3271–88.
McKayD, 2005, “Reading remittance landscapes: Female migration and agricultural transition in the Philippines”Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography10589–99.
MichaudJ (Ed.), 2000Turbulent Times and Enduring Peoples: Mountain Minorities in the South-East Asian Massif (Curzon, Richmond, Surrey).
25.
MuscatR J, 1994The Fifth Tiger: A Study of Thai Development Policy (United Nations University Press, Tokyo).
26.
ParnwellMJG (Ed.), 1996Uneven Development in Thailand (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants).
27.
ParnwellMJGKhamanarongS, 1990, “Rural industrialisation and development planning in Thailand”Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science181–27.
28.
PeckJ, 2005, “Economic sociologies in space”Economic Geography81129–176.
29.
PrayukvongW, 2007, “A Buddhist economic approach to happiness and capability linkage in OTOP craftsmen in Southern Thailand”Kasetsart Journal of Social Science28161–176.
30.
RiggJ, 2001More than the Soil: Rural Change in Southeast Asia (Pearson, Harlow, Essex).
31.
RiggJ, 2006, “Land, farming, livelihoods and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South”World Development34180–202.
32.
RiggJVeeravongsSVeeravongsLRohitarachoonP, 2008, “Reconfiguring rural spaces and remaking rural lives in Central Thailand”Journal of Southeast Asian Studies39355–381.
33.
ScottJ C, 1976The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
van der PloegJ DYeJ, 2010, “Multiple job holding in rural villages and the Chinese road to development”Journal of Peasant Studies37513–530.
38.
WherryF F, 2006a, “The nation-state, identity management, and indigenous crafts: Constructing markets and opportunities in Northwest Costa Rica”Ethnic and Racial Studies29124–152.
39.
WherryF F, 2006b, “The social sources of authenticity in global handicraft markets: Evidence from Northern Thailand”Journal of Consumer Culture65–32.
40.
World Bank, 1993The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
41.
World Bank, 2009World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography (World Bank, Washington, DC).
42.
YeungH W, 2005, “Rethinking relational economic geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3037–51.
