The rise of voluntary and participatory discourses under neoliberalism has been met with suspicion among scholars who identify within them vulnerabilities to state cooptation and control. A growing body of research suggests, however, that local communities and volunteer organizations are not so easily duped and that the new politics of public participation offer otherwise rare opportunities to pursue and enact alternative political agendas. This paper contributes to this debate by examining voluntarism in a long-marginalized African American community in Philadelphia. Far from being co-opted agents of state agendas, I argue that voluntary participation in the restoration of a local park has been seized upon by local residents in their efforts to reclaim public space, expose racialized injustice, and enact community citizenship. I adopt social theories of insurgency and performance to make my argument. I conclude with a discussion of the significance of devolution to communities whose principal experience with the state is one of political neglect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlinskyS, 1965, “The war on poverty: political pornography”Journal of Social Issues2141–43
2.
AtkinsonR, 1999, “Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration”Urban Studies3659–72
3.
BrennerNTheodoreN (Eds), 2002Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Europe (Blackwell, Oxford)
4.
BrownlowA, 2006, “An archaeology of fear and environmental change in Philadelphia”Geoforum37227–245
5.
BrownlowA, 2008A Political Ecology of Neglect: Race, Gender, and Environmental Change in Philadelphia (VDM, Saarbrücken)
6.
ClarkeLAgyemanJ, 2011, “Is there more to environmental participation than meets the eye? Understanding agency, empowerment, and disempowerment among black and minority ethnic communities”Area4388–95
CornwallA, 2004, “New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalized participation”IDS Bulletin351–10
9.
ElwoodS, 2002, “Neighborhood revitalization through ‘collaboration’: assessing the implications of neoliberal urban policy at the grassroots”GeoJournal58121–130
10.
ElwoodS, 2006, “Beyond cooptation or resistance: urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96323–341
11.
ElwoodSLeitnerH, 2003, “GIS and spatial knowledge production for neighborhood revitalization: negotiating state priorities and urban visions”Journal of Urban Affairs25139–157
12.
FagottoEFungA, 2006, “Empowered participation in urban governance: the Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30638–655
13.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchellGGordonCMillerP (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 87–104
14.
FyfeNMilliganC, 2003, “Out of the shadows: exploring the contemporary geographies of voluntarism”Progress in Human Geography27397–413
15.
GhoseR, 2005, “The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance”Space and Polity961–75
16.
GiddensA, 1998The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (Polity Press, Cambridge)
17.
GilbertLPhillipsC, 2003, “Practices of urban environmental citizenship: rights to the city and rights to nature in Toronto”Citizenship Studies7313–330
18.
GoldenbergN, 1999, “Philadelphia launches major restoration initiative in park system”Ecological Restoration178–14
19.
GoodwinMPainterJ, 1996, “Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series21635–648
20.
HardingS, 1999, “Towards a renaissance in urban parks”Cultural Trends353–20
21.
HarnikP, 2000Inside City Parks (Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC)
22.
HayC, 1995, “Re-stating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local state”Economy and Society24387–407
23.
HeynenNPerkinsHRoyP, 2006, “The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee”Urban Affairs Review423–25
24.
HickeySMohanG, 2004, “Towards participation as transformation: critical themes and challenges”, in Participation: from Tyranny to Transformation Eds HickeySMohanG (Zed Books, London) pp 3–24
25.
HobsonK, 2006, “Enacting environmental justice in Singapore: performative justice and the Green Volunteer Network”Geoforum37671–681
26.
HolstonJ, 1999, “Spaces of insurgent citizenship”, in Cities and Citizenship Ed. HolstonJ (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 155–176
27.
HoustonDPulidoL, 2002, “The work of performativity: staging social justice at the University of Southern California”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20401–424
28.
JonesP, 2003, “Urban regeneration's poisoned chalice: is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy?”Urban Studies40581–601
29.
JonesRCarterL, 1994, “Concern for the environment among black Americans: an assessment of common assumptions”Social Science Quarterly75560–579
30.
KearnsA, 1992, “Active citizenship and urban governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series1720–34
31.
KearnsA, 1995, “Active citizenship and local governance: political and geographical dimensions”Political Geography14155–175
32.
KoehlerDWrightsonM, 1987, “Inequality in the delivery of urban services: a reconsideration of the Chicago parks”The Journal of Politics4980–99
33.
LepofskyJFraserJ, 2003, “Building community citizens: claiming the right to place-making in the city”Urban Studies40127–142
34.
McInroyN, 2000, “Urban regeneration and public space: the story of an urban park”Space and Polity423–40
35.
MayerM, 1995, “Urban governance in the post-Fordist city”, in Managing Cities: The New Urban Text Eds HealyPCameronSDavoudiSGrahamSMadanipourA (John Wiley, New York) pp 231–249
36.
MilesISullivanWKuoF, 1998, “Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation”Urban Ecosystems227–41
37.
MilliganCFyfeN, 2005, “Preserving space for volunteers: exploring the links between voluntary welfare organizations, volunteering and citizenship”Urban Studies42417–433
38.
MiraftabFWillsS, 2005, “Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: the story of Western Cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa”Journal of Planning Education and Research25200–217
39.
MitchellD, 2003The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space (Guilford Press, New York)
40.
MohaiPBryantB, 1998, “Is there a ‘race’ effect on concern for environmental quality?”Public Opinion Quarterly62475–505
41.
MorisonJ, 2000, “The government–voluntary sector compacts: governance, governmentality, and civil society”Journal of Law and Society2798–132
42.
PainterJPhiloC, 1995, “Spaces of citizenship: an introduction”Urban Geography14107–120
43.
PeckJTickellA, 1994, “Too many partners: the future for local regeneration partnerships”Local Economy9251–265
44.
PincetlSGearinE, 2005, “The reinvention of public green space”Urban Geography26365–384
45.
Portfolio Associates, 2000Fairmount Park Survey: Final ReportPortfolio Associates, Inc., Philadelphia, PA
46.
PurcellM, 2003, “Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimaging the capitalist world order”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27564–590
47.
RacoM, 2000, “Assessing community participation in local economic development lessons for the new urban policy”Political Geography19573–599
48.
RacoM, 2003, “Governmentality, subject-building, and the discourses and practices of devolution in the UK”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2875–95
49.
RacoMImrieR, 2000, “Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy”Environment and Planning A322187–2204
50.
RoseN, 1999, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
51.
SchroederH, 2000, “The restoration experience: volunteers' motives, values, and concepts of nature”, in Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities Eds GobsterPHullB (Island Press, Washington DC) pp 247–264
52.
TaylorM, 2003Public Policy in the Community (Palgrave Macmillan, London)
53.
TaylorM, 2007, “Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces”Urban Studies44297–317
54.
ThompsonC, 2002, “Urban open space in the 21st century”Landscape and Urban Planning6059–72
55.
ThriftN, 1997, “The still point: resistance, expressive embodiment and dance”, in Geographies of Resistance Eds PileSKeithM (Routledge, London) pp 124–151
56.
TickellAPeckJ, 1992, “Accumulation, regulation and the missing geographies of post-Fordism: missing links in regulationist research”Progress in Human Geography16190–218
57.
TickellAPeckJ, 1995, “Social regulation after Fordism: regulation theory, neo-liberalism and the global–local nexus”Economy and Society24357–386
58.
WekerleG, 1999, “Gender planning as insurgent citizenship: stories from Toronto”Plurimondi1105–126
59.
WolchJ, 1990The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition (The Foundation Center, New York)
60.
WolchJWilsonJFehrenbachJ, 2005, “Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: an equity-mapping analysis”Urban Geography264–35
