Explanations of leisure travel must take the influence of participants' social contacts into account. To analyze this influence, transport planning uses social network analysis methods. While most past projects have focused on isolated network components, this paper presents a study collecting data on connected personal networks by taking a snowball sample. The paper explains difficulties for transport planning in approaching and explaining leisure travel and then introduces both the survey methodology and the instrument in detail. Advantages and disadvantages of snowball sampling are addressed, and the question why this strategy is important for approaching leisure travel, followed by experiences from the field about response rate, the fit between survey and target population, and sources of bias are given. Descriptive analyses highlight the potential of the data to produce new empirical insights.
AtkinsonRFlintJ, 2001, “Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies”Social Research Update issue 33, University of Surrey, Guildford, http://sru.soc.surrey7.ac.uk/SRU33.pdf
3.
AxhausenK W, 2005, “Social networks and travel: some hypotheses”, in Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives Eds DonaghyK PPoppelreuteSRudingerG (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 90–108
4.
AxhausenK WFreiA, 2007, “Contacts in a shrunken world”Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung number 440, Institute for Sea- and Land-Transport, ETH Zurich
BalmerM, 2007Travel Demand Modelling for Multi-Agent Simulations: Algorithms and Systems PhD dissertation, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Institute for Transport and Planning Systems (IVT), ETH Zurich
7.
BfSA R E, 2007, “Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnissse des Mikrozensus 2005 zum Verkehrsverhalten”. Federal Office for Spatial Development, Bern, and Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Neuenburg
8.
CarrascoJ A, 2006Social Activity–Travel Behaviour: A Personal Network Approach PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto
9.
CarrascoJ AMillerE J, 2009, “The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals”Transportation Research, Part A4390–104
10.
CarrascoJ AHoganBWellmanBMillerE J, 2008, “Collecting social network data to study social activity–travel behavior: an egocentric approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35961–980
11.
ChristakisN AFowlerJ H, 2009Connected. The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives (Little, Brown, New York)
12.
ColemanJ S, 1958, Relational analysis: the study of social organizations with survey methods”Human Organization17(4) 28–36
DfT, 2006Transport Statistics Bulletin: National Travel Survey: 2006Department for Transport, London
15.
DillmanD A, 2000Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (John Wiley, New York)
16.
EricksonB H, 1979, “Some problems of inference from chain data”Sociological Methodology10 (1) 276–302
17.
FrankO, 1979, “Estimation of population totals by use of snowball samples”, in Perspective on Social Networks Eds HollandPLeinhardtS (Academic Press, New York) pp 319–346
18.
FreemanL C, 1979, “Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification”Social Networks1215–239
19.
FreiAAxhausenK W, 2007, “Size and structures of social network geographies”, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, Nr. 439, Institute for Sea and Land Transport, ETH Zurich
20.
FuY C, 2007, “Contact diaries: building archives of actual and comprehensive personal networks”Field Methods19194–217
21.
GablerS, 1992, “Schneeballverfahren und verwandte Stichprobendesigns”ZUMA-Nachrichten16 (31) 47–69
22.
GoodmanL A, 1961, “Snowball sampling”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics32148–170
23.
HeckathornD, 1997, “Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations”Social Problems44174–199
24.
HeckathornD, 2002, “Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations”Social Problems4911–34
25.
HoganBCarrascoJ AWellmanB, 2007, “Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms”Field Methods19116–144
26.
IllenbergerJFlötterödGNagelK, 2008, “An approach to correct bias included by snowball sampling”, WP 08-16, Verkehrssystemplanung und Verkehrstelematik, TU Berlin, Berlin
27.
IllenbergerJFlötterödGKowalMNagelK, 2009, “A model for spatially embedded social networks”, paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur; copy available from J Illenberger, Institute for Land- and Sea-Transport, TU Berlin
28.
JonesE C, 2003, “Class-based social networks in regional economic systems”Research in Economic Anthropology volume 22 Anthropological Perspectives on Economic Development and Integration Eds DannhaeuserNWernerC (Emerald, Bingley, Beds) pp 3–23
29.
KossinetsGWattsD J, 2009, “Origins of homophily in an evolving social network”American Journal of Sociology115405–450
30.
KowaldMFreiAHackneyJ KIllenbergerJAxhausenK W, 2009, “Using an ascending sampling strategy to survey connected egocentric networks: a field work report on phase one of the survey”, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, Nr. 582, Institute for Sea- and Land-Transport, ETH Zurich
LarsenJUrrJAxhausenK W, 2008, “Coordinating face-to-face meetings in mobile network societies”Information, Communication and Society11640–658
33.
McCartyCBernardH RKillworthP DShelleG AJohnsenE C, 1997, “Eliciting representative samples of personal networks”Social Networks19303–323
34.
McPhersonMSmith-LoviLCookJ M, 2001, “Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks”Annual Review of Sociology27415–444
35.
MarinA, 2004, “Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data”Social Networks26289–307
36.
MarinAHamptonK N, 2007, “Simplifying the personal network name generator: alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators”Field Methods19163–193
37.
MathewsCCoetzeeNZwarensteinMLombardCGuttmacherSOxmaASchmidG, 2001, “Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases”, in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews issue 4 (The Cochrane Library/John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 1–23
38.
MilgramS, 1967, “The small world problem”Psychology Today1 (1) 61–67
39.
MokDWellmanB, 2007, “Did distance matter before the Internet?”Social Networks29430–461
40.
MokhtarianP LSalomonI, 2002, “Emerging travel patterns: do telecommunications make a difference?”, in Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges Ed. MahmassaniH S (Elsevier, Oxford) pp 143–182
41.
NewmanM E J, 2003, “The structure and function of complex networks”Siam Review45167–256
42.
OrtuzarJ DWillumsenL G, 2006Modelling Transport (John Wiley, New York)
43.
PoolIKochenM, 1978, “Contacts and influence”Social Networks15–51
44.
SalentinK, 1999, “Die Stichprobenziehung bei Zuwandererbefragungen”ZUMA-Nachrichten23 (45) 115–135
45.
SchlichRSchönfelderSHansoSAxhausenK W, 2004, Structures of leisure travel: temporal and spatial variability”Transportation Reviews24219–228
46.
SchnettlerS, 2009, “A structured overview of 50 years of small-world research”Social Networks31165–178
47.
SchweizerTSchnegMBerzbornS, 1998, “Personal networks and social support in a multiethnic community of southern California”Social Networks201–21
48.
ScottJ, 2007Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Sage, Los Angeles, CA)
49.
SilvisJNiemeieDD'SouzaR, 2006, “Social networks and travel behaviour: report from an integrated travel diary”, paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto; copy available from D Niemeier, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California—Davis, Davis, CA
50.
SteglichCSnijdersT A BPearsonM, 2010, “Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence”Social Methodology40329–393
51.
StutzF P, 1973, “Distance and network effects on urban social travel fields”Economic Geography49134–144
52.
US Department of Transportation, 2004Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel SurveyFederal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
53.
van den BergPArentzTTimmermansH, 2008, “Social networks, ICT use and activity travel patterns. Data collection and first analyses”, paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, Leende; copy available from P van den Berg, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
54.
VogtW P, 2005Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Science (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
55.
WassermanSFaustK, 2007Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York)
56.
WolfM, 2004, “Egozentrierte Netzwerke: Erhebungsverfahren und Datenqualität”Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie Sonderheft (special issue) 44244–273
