Bringing in neo-institutional perspectives, this paper investigates the recent corporatisation process of three seaports in Asia and Europe. We focus on whether the newly established seaport governance structures follow a path largely affected by the local/national institutional frameworks and the political traditions in place. Findings confirm that path-dependent decisions largely preserve the institutional characteristics of local/national systems, resulting in implementation asymmetries when different countries seek generic governance solutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AirriessC A, 2001a, “The regionalization of Hutchison Port holdings in mainland China”Journal of Transport Geography9267–278.
2.
AirriessC A, 2001b, “Regional production information-communication technology and the developmental state: The rise of Singapore as a global container hub”Geoforum32235–254.
3.
BichouKGrayR, 2005, “A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports”Transportation Research A3975–92.
4.
BoyerRHollingsworthJ R, 1997, “From national embeddedness to spatial and institutional nestedness”, in Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions Eds HollingsworthJ RBoyerR (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 433–484.
5.
BPA, 2006Port of BusanBusan Port Authority, Busan.
6.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481.
7.
BrooksM R, 2004, “The governance structure of ports”Review of Network Economics3168–180.
8.
BrooksM RCullinaneK (Eds), 2007Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance (Elsevier, Oxford).
9.
BrooksM RPallisA A, 2008, “Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components”Maritime Policy and Management35411–432.
10.
BuitelaarELagendijkAJacobsW, 2007, “A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy”Environment and Planning A39891–908.
11.
ChlomoudisC IPallisA A, 2002European Port Policy: Towards a Long-term Strategy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
12.
CullinaneKSongD W, 2007Asian Container Ports (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).
13.
D'AunnoTSucciMAlexanderJ A, 2000, “The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organisational change”Administrative Science Quarterly45679–698.
14.
de LangenP W, 2002, “Clustering and performance: The case of maritime clustering in The Netherlands”Maritime Policy and Management29209–221.
15.
DelmasMTokatY, 2005, “Deregulation, governance structures and efficiency: The US electric utility sector”Strategic Management Journal26441–460.
16.
DenzauA TNorthD, 1994, “Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions”Kyklos47(1) 3–31.
17.
Fernandez-AllesMDLLLlamas-SanchezR, 2008, “The neo-institutional analysis of change in public services”Journal of Change Management8(1) 3–20.
18.
GranovetterM, 1985, “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”American Journal of Sociology91481–510.
19.
GrantW, 1997, “Perspectives on globalization and economic coordination”, in Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions Eds HollingsworthJ RBoyerR (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 319–336.
20.
HallP A, 1986Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (Polity Press, Cambridge).
21.
HallP V, 2003, “Regional institutional convergence? Reflections from the Baltimore Waterfront”Economic Geography79347–363.
22.
HallP VJacobsW, 2009, “Ports in proximity, proximity in ports: Towards a typology”, in Ports in Proximity: Competition and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports Eds NotteboomTDucruetCDe LangenP W (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 29–40.
23.
HallP ATaylorRCR, 1998, “Political science and the three new institutionalisms”, in Institutions and Social Order Eds SoltanKSoltanEUslanerE MHauflerV (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 14–44.
24.
Hart-LandsbergMBurkettP, 2001, “Economic crisis and restructuring in South Korea”Critical Asian Studies33403–430.
25.
HeaverT D, 1995, “The implications of increased competition among ports for port policy and management”Maritime Policy and Management22125–133.
26.
HendersonJDickenPHessMCoeNYeungHWC, 2002, “Global production networks and the analysis of economic development”Review of International Political Economy9436–464.
27.
HeritierAKerwerDKnillCLehmkuhlDTeutschMDouilletA C, 2001Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD).
28.
JacobsW, 2007a, “Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach: An institutional analysis”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie98360–372.
29.
JacobsW, 2007bPolitical Economy of Port Competition: Institutional Analyses of Rotterdam, Southern California and Dubai (Academic Press Europe, Nijmegen).
30.
JacobsWHallP V, 2007, “What conditions supply chain strategies of ports? The case of Dubai”Geo Journal68327–342.
31.
JessopBOosterlynckS, 2008, “Cultural political economy: On making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology”Geoforum391155–1169.
32.
JohnsonGSmithSCodlingB, 2000, “Microprocesses of institutional change on the context of privatisation”Academy of Management Review25572–581.
33.
Korea IT Times2005, “Busan Newport in full swing”, 12 June.
34.
LeeS WSongD WDucruetC, 2008, “A tale of Asia's world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities”Geoforum39372–385.
35.
MarchJ GOlsenJ P, 1989Rediscovering Institutions: The Organisational Basis of Politics (The Free Press, New York).
36.
MOMAF, 2004Materials in Explaining the Establishment of BPA: Official Briefings to the MediaMinistry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Government of the Republic of Korea, Seoul.
37.
National Government of the Republic of Korea, 1999, “Government Organization Management Survey Report”, unpublished government document.
38.
NgA, 2009Port Competition: The Case of North EuropeVDM Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Saarbrücken.
39.
NgKYA, 2006, “Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition”Maritime Economics and Logistics8234–250.
40.
NgKYAGujarG C, 2009, “The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: Evidences from Southern India”Journal of Transport Geography17346–356.
41.
NgKYAPallisA A, 2007, “Reforming port governance: The role of political culture”, in Proceedings of IAME 2007International Association of Maritime Economists, http://www.iame.info.
42.
NgAKYTongzonJ L, 2010, “Government policies and regional development: Some lessons from the dry port sector in Northwest India”Eurasian Geography and Economics in press.
43.
NotteboomT, 2009a, “Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports”Environment and Planning A41743–762.
44.
NotteboomT, 2009b, “Path dependency and contingency in the development of multi-port gateway regions and multi-port hub regions”, in Ports in Proximity: Competition, and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports Eds NotteboomTDucruetCDe LangenP W (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 55–72.
45.
NotteboomTDucruetCDe LangenP W, 2009Ports in Proximity: Competition, and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
46.
NotteboomTWinkelmansW, 2001, “Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge?”Maritime Policy and Management28(1) 71–89.
47.
OlivierDSlackB, 2006, “Rethinking the port”Environment and Planning A381409–1427.
48.
PallisA A, 2002The Common EU Maritime Transport Policy (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
49.
PallisA A, 2007a, “Whither port strategy? Theory and practice in conflict”, in Maritime Transport: The Greek Paradigm Ed. PallisA A (Elsevier, London) pp 345–386.
50.
PallisA A, 2007b, “EU port policy developments: Implications for port governance”, in Devolution, Port Governance and Performance Eds BrooksM RCullinaneK (Elsevier, London) pp 161–176.
51.
PallisA AVaggelasG K, 2005, “Port competitiveness and the EU port services directive: The case of Greek ports”Maritime Economics and Logistics7116–140.
52.
PanayidesP MCullinaneK, 2002, “Competitive advantage in liner shipping: A Review and research agenda”International Journal of Maritime Economics4189–209.
53.
PiersonP, 1993, “When effects become cause: Policy feedback and political change”World Politics45595–628.
54.
PoR, Port of Rotterdam NV, Rotterdam2002–07Annual Reports.
55.
PoR, Port of Rotterdam NV, Rotterdam2004Port Vision 2020.
56.
PoR, Port of Rotterdam NV, Rotterdam2005PoR Business Plan 2006–2010 unpublished document.
57.
PoR, Port of Rotterdam NV, Rotterdam2007The Port of Rotterdam and her Marketing and Sales Approach unpublished document.
58.
PouderR W, 1996, “Privatizing services in local government: An empirical assessment of efficiency and institutional explanations”Public Administration Quarterly20(1) 103–127.
59.
PowellWDi MaggioP, 1991The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
60.
PPA, 2001–07Annual ReportsPiraeus Port Authority, SA, Piraeus.
61.
PsaraftisH N, 2005, “Tariff reform in the port of Piraeus: A Practical approach”Maritime Economics and Logistics7356–381.
62.
PsaraftisH N, 2006Public Financing and Charging Practices of Seaports in the EU report prepared for the European Commission, DG-TREN, Bremen.
63.
RowanB, 2002, “About local autonomy in South Korea”The Korean Times 24 October, http://www.koreatimes.co.kr.
64.
RyooD KHurY S, 2007, “Busan: The future logistics hub of Northeast Asia”, in Asian Container Ports Eds CullinaneKSongD W (Palgrave Macmillan, New York) pp 34–61.
65.
SminiaHVan NistelrooijA, 2006, “Strategic management and organisation development: Planned change in a public sector organisation”Journal of Change Management6(1) 99–113.
66.
SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF (Eds), 1992Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).
67.
StiglitzJ E, 2006Making Globalisation Work (Norton, New York).
68.
ToonenTAJ, 1998, “Provinces versus urban centres: Current developments background and evaluation of regionalisation in The Netherlands”, in Regions in Europe: The Paradox of Power Eds Le GalesPLequesneC (Routledge, London) pp 130–149.
69.
UNCTAD, 1995Comparative Analysis of Deregulation, Commercialization and Privatization of Ports (UNCTAD, New York).
70.
WangJ JNgKYAOlivierD, 2004, “Port governance in China: A Review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices”Transport Policy11237–250.
71.
WilliamsonO E, 1985The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York).
72.
WilliamsonO E, 2000, “The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead”Journal of Economic Literature38595–613.
73.
World Bank, 2007The World Bank Port Reform Tool Kit2nd edition (World Bank, Washington, DC).
74.
YeoG TChoS H, 2007, “Busan and Gwangyang: One country, two port system”, in Asian Container Ports Eds CullinaneKSongD W (Palgrave Macmillan, New York) pp 225–238.
