The author discusses and explores empirically how far the notion of relational distance might improve understanding of the geography of innovation processes. Relational distance is regarded (1) as a multidimensional concept which becomes fruitful when used in a heuristic way; (2) as an interactional effect; and (3) as being enacted in practice. The author illustrates this understanding empirically by presenting an ethnographic case study: the development biography of an analytical device. In this case, relational distance emerged between science and business. The author scrutinizes how relational distance not only induces cultural tensions but also intertwines divergent practical activities unfolding differently in space. Thereby it generates dynamic time–spatial ambiguities: namely, effects of dislocation, ambiguities of knowledge allocation, and opportunity costs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarM, 1980The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction into Ethnography (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).
2.
AminACohendetP, 2004Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
3.
AminARobertsJ, 2008, “Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice”Research Policy37353–369.
4.
AsakawaK, 2001, “Organizational tension in international R&D management: The case of Japanese firms”Research Policy30735–757.
5.
AsheimBGertlerM, 2005, “Regional innovation systems and the geographical foundation of innovation”, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Eds FagerbergJMoweryDNelsonR (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 291–317.
6.
AsheimB TCoenenLVangJ, 2007, “Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25655–670.
7.
BatheltHSchuldtN, 2008, “Between luminaries and meat grinders: International trade fairs as temporary clusters”Regional Studies42853–868.
8.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progressing Human Geography2831–56.
9.
BeunzaDStarkD, 2004, “Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room”Industrial and Corporate Change13369–400.
10.
BlancHSierraC, 1999, “The internationalization of R&D by multinationals: A trade-off between external and internal proximity”Cambridge Journal of Economics23187–206.
11.
BoschmaR, 2005, “Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment”Regional Studies3961–74.
12.
CoeN MBunnellT G, 2003, “‘Spatializing’ knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks”Global Networks3437–456.
13.
CoenenLMoodyssonJAsheimB T, 2004, “Nodes, networks and proximities: On the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster”European Planning Studies121003–1018.
14.
ColyvasJ APowellW W, 2006, “Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science”Research in Organizational Behavior27305–353.
15.
CortazziM, 2001, “Narrative analysis in ethnography”, in Handbook of Ethnography Eds AtkinsonPCoffeyADelamontSLoflandJLoflandL (Sage, London) pp 384–394.
16.
CoulterJ, 2001, “Human practices and the observability of the ‘macro social’”, in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory Eds SchatzkiT RCetinaKnorr Kvon SavignyE (Routledge, London) pp 29–41.
17.
EmersonR MFretzR IShawL L, 2001, “Participant observation and fieldnotes”, in Handbook of Ethnography Eds AtkinsonPCoffeyADelamontSLoflandJLoflandL (Sage, London) pp 352–368.
18.
FloridaR, 1997, “The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA”Research Policy2685–103.
19.
GertlerM, 1995, “Being there: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies”Economic Geography711–26.
20.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyHSchwartzmanSScottPTrowM, 1994The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage, London).
21.
GoffmanE, 1989, “On fieldwork”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18123–132.
22.
GrabherG, 2002, “The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talent and teams”Regional Studies36245–262.
23.
GrabherGIbertO, 2006, “Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks”Journal of Economic Geography6251–271.
24.
GrabherGIbertOFlohrS, 2008, “The neglected king: The customer in the new knowledge ecology of innovation”Economic Geography84253–280.
25.
HannerzU, 2003, “Being there … and there … and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography”Ethnography4201–216.
26.
IbertO, 2004, “Projects and firms as discordant complements: Organisational learning in the Munich software ecology”Research Policy331529–1546.
27.
JonesA, 2007, “More than ‘managing across borders’? The complex role of face-to-face interaction in globalizing law firms”Journal of Economic Geography71–24.
28.
JönsH, 2008, “Academic travel from Cambridge University and the formation of centres of knowledge, 1885–1954”Journal of Historical Geography34338–362.
29.
KiratTLungY, 1999, “Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes”European Urban and Regional Studies627–38.
30.
CetinaKnorr K, 1981The Manufacture of Knowledge (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
31.
CetinaKnorr K, 2001, “Objectual practice”, in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory Eds SchatzkiT RCetinaKnorr Kvon SavignyE (Routledge, London) pp 175–188.
32.
CetinaKnorr KBrueggerU, 2002, “Global microstructures: The virtual societies of financial markets”American Journal of Sociology107905–950.
33.
KopytoffI, 1986, “The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as a process”, in The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective Ed. AppaduraiA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 64–91.
LamA, 2003, “Organizational learning in multinationals: R&D networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK”Journal of Management Studies40673–703.
36.
LamA, 2007, “Knowledge networks and careers: Academic scientists in industry–university links”Journal of Management Studies44993–1016.
37.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
38.
LawJ, 1986, “On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 234–263.
39.
LivingstoneD N, 2003Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
40.
LundinrASöderholmA, 1995, “A theory of the temporary organization”Scandinavian Journal of Management11437–455.
41.
MalmbergAMaskellP, 2002, “The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”Environment and Planning A34429–449.
42.
MalmbergAMaskellP, 2006, “Localized learning revisited”Growth and Change371–18.
43.
MaskellP, 2001, “Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”Industrial and Corporate Change10921–943.
44.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1999, “The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning”European Urban and Regional Studies69–25.
45.
MasseyD, 1994Space, Place and Gender (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
46.
MasseyD, 2005For Space (Sage, London).
47.
MoodysonJJonssonO, 2007, “Knowledge collaboration and proximity: The spatial organization of biotech innovation projects”European Urban and Regional Studies14115–131.
48.
MorganK, 2004, “The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems”Journal of Economic Geography43–21.
49.
MoweryD CNelsonR RSampatB NZiedonisA A, 2004Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University–Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh–Dole Act in the United States (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
50.
NooteboomB, 2001Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
51.
PowerDJanssonJ, 2008, “Cyclical clusters in global circuits: Overlapping spaces in furniture trade fairs”Economic Geography84423–448.
52.
RalletATorreA, 1999, “Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy”Geo Journal49373–380.
53.
RosenbergN, 1982, “Learning by using”, in Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics Ed. RosenbergN (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 120–140.
54.
SaxenianA, 2006The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
55.
SchoenbergerE, 1997The Cultural Crisis of the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford).
56.
SchutzA, 1964, “The stranger. An essay in social psychology”, in Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory Edited and Introduced by Arvid Brodersen Ed. SchutzA (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague) pp 91–105.
57.
SchwanenT, 2007, “Matter(s) of interest: Artefacts, spacing and timing”Geografiska Annaler, Series B899–22.
58.
ShaneS, 2004Academic Entrepreneur ship: University Spin-offs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
59.
SpradleyJ P, 1979The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).
StarS LGriesemerJ R, 1989, “Institutional ecology, ‘translation’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39”Social Studies of Science19387–420.
62.
StorperMVenablesA J, 2004, “Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy”Journal of Economic Geography4351–370.
63.
ThriftN, 2000, “Performing cultures in the new economy”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90674–692.
64.
TorreA, 2008, “On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission”Regional Studies421–21.
65.
TorreAGillyJ-P, 2000, “On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics”Regional Studies34169–180.
66.
TorreARalletA, 2005, “Proximity and localization”Regional Studies3947–59.
67.
UzziB, 1997, “Social structure and competition in interfîrm networks: The paradox of embeddedness”Administrative Science Quarterly4235–67.
68.
VinckD, 2003, “Socio-technical complexity: Redesigning a shielding wall”, in Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation Ed. VinckD (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 13–27.
69.
von HippelE, 1976, “The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process”Research Policy5212–219.
70.
von HippelE, 1988The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
71.
von HippelE, 1994, “Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving: Implications for innovation”Management Science40429–439.
72.
von HippelETyreM, 1995, “How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment”Research Policy241–12.
73.
von ZedtwitzM, 2004, “Managing foreign R&D laboratories in China”R&D Management34439–452.
74.
WilsonJ MO'LearyM BMetiuAQuintusR J, 2008, “Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close”Organization Studies29979–1002.
