Despite the growing body of research examining the collateral consequences of legislation governing sex offenders, a complete understanding of their residential choices post release remains elusive. This paper develops a predictive–analytical framework that helps determine which demographic and socioeconomic factors best forecast the residential choices of convicted sex offenders. Specifically, a derived index of social disorganization (ISDOR) is implemented in both statistical and nonlinear data mining approaches to predict the presence of sex offenders in a community. The results of the analysis are encouraging, predicting nearly 75% of registered offender locations correctly. The utility of this framework as a tool for public policy and law enforcement is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, 2006, Public Law 109–248. 42 U.S.C §16901–16962.
2.
BarnesJ CDukesTTewksburyRDe TroyeT M, 2009, “Analyzing the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders”Criminal Justice Policy Review2021–42.
3.
BlauJ RBlauP M, 1982, “The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime”American Sociological Review47114–129.
4.
BurchfieldK BMingusW, 2008, “Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders' experiences with local social capital and social control”Criminal Justice and Behavior35356–374.
5.
BursikRJJr, 1988, “Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects”Criminology26519–551.
CarrollLJacksonP I, 1983, “Inequality, opportunity, and crime rates in central cities”Criminology21178–194.
8.
ChajewskiMCalkins-MercadoC, 2009, “An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions”Criminal Justice Policy Review2044–61.
9.
CohenL EFelsonM, 1979, “Social change and crime rate trends: A Routine activity approach”American Sociological Review44588–608.
10.
CorcoranJ JWilsonI DWareA, 2003, “Predicting the geo-temporal variations of crime and disorder”International Journal of Forecasting19623–634.
11.
CronbachL J, 1951, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of the test”Psychometrika16297–334.
DaveyM, 2006, “Iowa's residency rules drive sex offenders underground”New York Times 15 March.
14.
EberhartRDobbinsR (Eds), 1990Neural Network PC Tools: A Practical Guide (Academic Press, San Diego, CA).
15.
EdwardsWHensleyC, 2001, “Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws”International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology4583–101.
16.
FawcettT, 2006, “An introduction to ROC analysis”Pattern Recognition Letters27861–874.
17.
FischerM MGopalS, 1994, “Artificial neural networks: A New approach to modeling interregional telecommunications flows”Journal of Regional Science34503–527.
18.
GrothA NLongoR EMcFadinJ B, 1982, “Undetected recidivism among rapists and child molesters”Crime and Delinquency28450–458.
KohaviRProvostF, 1998, “Glossary of terms”Machine Learning30(2/3) 271–274.
31.
LawrenceJ, 1993Introduction to Neural Networks: Design, Theory, and Applications (California Scientific Software, Nevada City, CA).
32.
LevensonJ S, 2008, “Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions”Criminal Justice Studies21153–166.
33.
LevensonJ SCotterL P, 2005, “The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd”International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology49168–178.
34.
LevensonJ SHernA L, 2007, “Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry”Justice Research and Policy959–74.
LeviR, 2000, “The mutuality of risk and community: The adjudication of community notification statutes”Economy and Society29578–601.
37.
LochnerL, 2004, “Education, work and crime: A Human capital approach”International Economic Review45811–843.
38.
LochnerLMorettiL P, 2001, “The effect of education on crime: evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports”, WP 8605, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8605.pdf.
39.
McClellandJRumelhartD, 1988, Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
40.
MastersT, 1993Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++ (Academic Press, San Diego, CA).
41.
MessnerS F, 1982, “Poverty, inequality, and the urban homicide rate”Criminology20103–114.
42.
MustaineE ETewksburyRStengelK M, 2006, “Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence?”Deviant Behavior27329–350.
43.
OlligschlaegerA M, 1998, “Artificial neural networks and crime mapping”, in Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention, Crime Prevention Studies, volume 8 Eds WeisburdDMcEwenT (Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY) pp 313–347.
44.
OpenshawS, 1998, “Neural network, genetic, and fuzzy logic models of spatial interaction”Environment and Planning A301857–1872.
45.
OsgoodD WChambersJ M, 2000, “Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence”Criminology3881–116.
46.
PattersonE B, 1991, “Poverty, income inequality, and community crime rates”Criminology29755–776.
47.
RatcliffeJ H, 2001, “On the accuracy of TIGER type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units”International Journal of Geographical Information Science15473–485.
48.
RomeroJ JWilliamsL M, 1985, “Recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A 10-year followup study”Federal Probation4958–64.
49.
RoncekD W, 1981, “Dangerous places: Crime and residential environment”Social Forces6074–96.
50.
RoncekD WMaierP A, 1991, “Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘hot spots’”Criminology29725–753.
51.
SampsonR J, 1985, “Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency227–40.
52.
SampsonRGrovesB, 1989, “Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory”American Journal of Sociology94774–802.
53.
SampsonR JRaudenbushS WEarlsF, 1997, “Neighborhoods and violent crime: A Multilevel study of collective efficacy”Science277918–924.
54.
ShawCMcKayH, 1942Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquents in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
55.
ShuermanLKobrinS, 1986, “Community careers in crime”Crime and Justice867–100.
SnymanJ A, 2005Practical Mathematical Optimization: An Introduction to Basic Optimization Theory and Classical and New Gradient-based Algorithms (Springer, New York).
58.
SteffensmeierDHaynieD, 2000, “Gender, structural disadvantage, and urban crime: Do macrosocial variables also explain female offender rates?”Criminology38403–438.
59.
TewksburyR, 2005, “Collateral consequences of sex offender registration”Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice2167–81.
60.
TewksburyRMustaineE E, 2006, “Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions”Criminal Justice Studies1961–75.
WhitselE AQuibreraP MSmithR LCatellierD JLiaoDHenleyA CHeissG, 2006, “Accuracy of commercial geocoding: Assessment and implications”Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations3:8, http://www.epi-perspectives.com/3/1/8.
66.
ZandbergenP AHartT C, 2006, “Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS”Justice Research and Policy81–24.
67.
ZandbergenP AHartT C, 2009, “Geocoding accuracy considerations in determining residency restrictions for sex offenders”Criminal Justice Policy Review2062–90.
68.
ZevitzR GFarkasM A, 2000, “Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance”Behavioral Science and the Law18375–391.
