The advantages and disadvantages of public sector decentralization are widely discussed in economics and political science. Some authors argue that decentralization leads to an optimal provision of public services and promotes economic growth, while others emphasize the dangers of competition between subnational governments, especially those associated with interregional redistribution. Using cross-section and panel data for twenty-three OECD countries, from 1982 to 2000, this paper empirically studies the impact of fiscal decentralization on regional disparities. It is found that a higher degree of decentralization is associated with lower regional disparities. Hence, poor regions experience no disadvantages from decentralization and, instead, appear to benefit.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkaiN, 2002, “Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States”Journal of Urban Economics5293–108.
2.
AkaiNSakataM, 2004, “Fiscal decentralization, commitment, and regional inequality: Evidence from state-level, cross-sectional data for the United States”, CIRJE DP 315, University of Hyogo and Osaka International University.
3.
ArellanoMBondS, 1991, “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”Review of Economic Studies58277–297.
4.
BaldwinR EKrugmanP, 2004, “Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization”European Economic Review481–23.
5.
BaltagiB H, 1995Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
6.
BoadwayR, 2001, “Inter-governmental fiscal relations: The facilitator of fiscal decentralization”Constitutional Political Economy1293–121.
7.
BoadwayRFlattersF, 1982, “Efficiency and equalization payments in a federal system of government: A synthesis and extension of recent results”Canadian Journal of Economics15613–633.
8.
BondS, 2002, “Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice”Portuguese Economic Journal1141–162.
9.
BonetJ, 2006, “Fiscal decentralization and regional income disparities: Evidence from the Colombian experience”Annals of Regional Science40661–676.
10.
DaltonH, 1920, “The measurement of the inequality of incomes”Economic Journal30348–361.
11.
DavoodiHZouH, 1998, “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth: A cross country study”Journal of Urban Economics43244–257.
12.
DevelopmentCommittee, 2006Strengthening Bank Group Engagement on Governance and Anticorruption Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries (World Bank, Washington, DC).
13.
EzcurraRPascualP, 2008, “Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union countries”Environment and Planning A401185–1201.
GianettiM, 2002, “The effects of integration on regional disparities: Convergence, divergence or both?”European Economic Review46539–567.
16.
CanaletaGil CArzozPascual PGárateRapun M, 2004, “Regional economic disparities and decentralization”Urban Studies4171–94.
17.
HansenN AKesslerA S, 2004, “Interregional redistribution and mobility in federations: A positive approach”, DP 4576, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
18.
HausmanJ A, 1978, “Specification tests in econometrics”Econometria461251–1272.
19.
IimiA, 2005, “Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note”Journal of Urban Economics57449–461.
20.
JinHQianY.WeingastB, 2005, “Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style”Journal of Public Economics891719–1742.
21.
KanburRZhangX, 2005, “Fifty years of regional inequality in China: A journey through revolution, reform and openness”Review of Development Economics987–106.
22.
KesslerA SLessmannC, 2008, “Interregional redistribution and regional income disparities: How equalization does (not) work”, working paper, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.
23.
KimEHongS WHaS J, 2003, “The impact of national development and decentralization policies on regional income disparity in Korea”Annals of Regional Science3779–91.
24.
KrugmanP, 1991Geography and Trade (Leuven University Press, Leuven).
25.
KuznetsS, 1955, “Economic growth and income inequality”American Economic Review451–28.
26.
LessmannC, 2006, “Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity: A penal data approach for OECD countries”, Ifo WP 25, Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich.
27.
LessmannCMarkwardtG, 2008, “One size fits all? Decentralization, corruption, and the monitoring of bureaucrats”, working paper, Department of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden.
28.
LijphartA, 1984Democracies (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
29.
McKinnonR I, 1997, “Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American monetary union”, in Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance: Essays in Honour of Vito Tanzi Eds BlejerMTer-MinassianT (Routledge, London) pp 73–93.
30.
Martinez-VazquezJMcNabR, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth”World Development3191597–1616.
31.
OatesW E, 1972Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).
32.
OatesW E, 1993, “Fiscal decentralization and economic development”National Tax Journal46237–243.
33.
OatesW E, 1999, “An essay on fiscal federalism”Journal of Economic Literature371120–1149.
34.
OECD, 1999Taxing Powers of State and Local Government OECD Tax Policy Studies No 1 (OECD, Paris).
35.
PerssonTTabelliniG, 1996, “Federal fiscal constitutions: Risk sharing and redistribution”Journal of Political Economy104979–1009.
36.
PigouA C, 1912Wealth and Welfare (Macmillan, London).
37.
Prud'hommeR, 1995, “The dangers of decentralization”World Bank Research Observer10201–220.
38.
QianYWeingastB, 1997, “Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives”Journal of Economic Perspectives1183–92.
39.
RoddenJ, 2004, “Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement”Comparative Politics36481–500.
40.
Rodriguez-PoseAGillN, 2004, “Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution?”Environment and Planning A362097–2117.
41.
ShankarRShahA, 2003, “Bridging the economic divide within countries—a scorecard on the performance of regional policies in reducing regional income disparities”World Development311421–1441.
StegarescuD, 2005, “Public sector decentralization: Measurement concepts and recent international trends”Fiscal Studies26301–333.
44.
TanziV, 1996, “Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects”, in Annual World Bank Conference on Economic Development Eds BrunoMPleskovicB (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 539–567.
45.
ThorntonJ, 2007, “Fiscal decentralization and growth reconsidered”Journal of Urban Economics6164–70.
46.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424.
47.
TreismanD, 2002, “Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective”, working paper, Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
48.
WeingastB, 1995, “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization111–31.
49.
WhiteH, 1980, “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test of heteroskedasticity”Econometrica48817–838.
50.
WooldridgeJ M, 2002Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
51.
YilmazS, 1999, “The impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic performance”, in Proceedings of the 92nd Annual Conference on TaxationNational Tax Association, Washington, DC, pp 251–260.
52.
ZouH F, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China”Journal of Public Economics67221–240.
