Time spent on work and commuting within dual-earner households is often analysed separately for individuals, but this does no justice to the reality of dual-earner households where decisions on work and commuting are made in a household context. This paper reports on a quantitative study of the impact of the residential context on working arrangements and commuting arrangements of partners in couple and family households. Using multinomial logistic regression, we analysed data from the 2002 Netherlands Housing Demand Survey and the 2004 ABF Real Estate Monitor. The results show a (gendered) effect of residential location in terms of degree of urbanisation and job access on both working and commuting arrangements. Good access to jobs makes it more likely that couples have a symmetric full-time working arrangement and also more likely that both partners work far away from home. Those in symmetric full-time working arrangements are also those most likely to be in symmetric close commuting arrangements. This finding reflects the substantial time pressure on such households.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndriessenIDagevosJNieversEBoogI, 2007Discriminatiemonitor niet-westerse allochtonen op de arbeidsmarkt 2007 [Discrimination Monitor 2007 non-Western ethnic minorities on the labour market] (Social en Cultured Planbureau, The Hague)
2.
BeckerG S, 1962, “Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis”Journal of Political Economy70(5)9–49
3.
BeckerG S, 1965, “A theory of the allocation of time”Economic Journal75493–517
4.
BeckerG S, 1981A Treatise on the Family (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
5.
BlundellRMaCurdyT, 1999, “Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches”, in Handbook of Labor Economics Eds AshenfelterOCardD (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 1559–1689
6.
BrunJFagnaniJ, 1994, “Lifestyles and locational choices—trade-offs and compromises: a case-study of middle-class couples living in the Ile-de-France region”Urban Studies31921–934
7.
ClarkW A VKuijpers-LindeM, 1994, “Commuting in restructuring urban regions”Urban Studies31465–483
8.
ClarkbergMMoenP, 2001, “Understanding the time-squeeze: married couples' preferred and actual work-hour strategies”American Behavioral Scientist441115–1135
9.
CostaD LKahnM E, 2000, “Power couples: changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990”The Quarterly Journal of Economics1151287–1315
10.
De MeesterEMulderC HFortuijnJ D, 2007, “Time spent in paid work by women and men in urban and less urban contexts in the Netherlands”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie98585–602
11.
Droogleever FortuijnJ, 1993Een druk bestaan: Tijdsbesteding en ruimtegebruik van tweeverdieners met kinderen [A busy life: the use of time and space in dual-earner families] (Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam)
12.
DuyvendakJ WStavenuiterM M J, 2004Reconciliation of Working Life and Family Life: Working Fathers, Caring Men (Verwey-Jonker Instituut, Rotterdam)
13.
EnglandK V L, 1993, “Suburban pink collar ghettos: the spatial entrapment of women?”Annals of the Association of American Geographers83226–242
14.
GreenA E, 1997, “A question of compromise? Case study evidence on the location and mobility strategies of dual career households”Regional Studies31641–657
15.
GronauR, 1977, “A theory of the allocation of time revisited”Journal of Political Economy851099–1123
16.
HägerstrandT, 1970, “What about people in regional science?”Papers of the Regional Science Association247–21
17.
HansonSJohnstonI, 1985, “Gender differences in work-trip length explanations and implications”Urban Geography6193–219
18.
HansonSPrattA C, 1988, “Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography”Economic Geography64299–321
19.
HansonSPrattG, 1995Gender, Work, and Space (Routledge, London)
20.
HeldermanA CVan HamMMulderC H, 2006, “Migration and home ownership”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie97(2) 107–121
21.
HochschildA RMachungA, 1989The Second Shift (Viking Press, New York)
22.
JarvisH, 1999, “The tangled webs we weave: household strategies to co-ordinate home and work”Work, Employment and Society13225–247
23.
JarvisH, 2005, “Moving to London time: household co-ordination and the infrastructure of everyday life”Time and Society14(1) 133–154
24.
Johnston-AnumonwoI, 1992, “The influence of household type on gender differences in work trip distance”The Professional Geographer44161–169
25.
KarstenL, 2003, “Family gentrifiers: challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children”Urban Studies402573–2584
26.
KeuzenkampSHooghiemstraE, 2000De kunst van het combineren: taakverdeling onder partners [The art of combining: task division between partners] (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag)
27.
KnijnT, 2003, “Challenges and risks of individualisation in The Netherlands”Social Policy and Society3(1) 57–65
28.
LiaoT F, 1994Interpreting Probability Models Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
29.
McDowellL, 2004, “Work, workfare, work/life balance and ethic of care”Progress in Human Geography28145–163
30.
MacLaffertySPrestonV, 1992, “Spatial mismatch and labor market segmentation for African-American and Latina women”Economic Geography68406–431
31.
MaddenJ F, 1981, “Why women work closer to home”Urban Studies18181–194
32.
MincerJPolachekS, 1974, “Family investments in human capital: earnings of women”Journal of Political Economy8276–108
33.
MoenP, 2003It's About Time: Couples and Careers (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
34.
PresserH, 2006, “Employment in a 24/7 economy: challenges for the family”, in Gender Divisions and Working Time in the New Economy Eds PerronsDFaganCMcDowellLRayKWardK (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 35–57
35.
RouwendalJNijkampP, 2004, “Living in two worlds: a review of home-to-work decisions”Growth and Change35287–303
36.
SchwanenT, 2006, “On ‘arriving on time’, but what is ‘on time’?”Geoforum37882–894
37.
SchwanenTDijstM, 2002, “Travel-time ratios for visits to the workplace: the relationship between commuting time and work duration”Transportation Research Part A36573–592
38.
SchwanenTDijstMDielemanF M, 2002, “A microlevel analysis of residential context and travel time”Environment and Planning A341487–1507
39.
SchwanenTEttemaDTimmermansH, 2007, “If you pick up the children, I'll do the groceries: spatial differences in between-partner interactions in out-of-home household activities”Environment and Planning A392754–2773
TiversJ, 1985Women Attached: The Daily Lives of Women with Young Children (Croom Helm, London)
42.
TurnerTNiemeierD, 1997, “Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence”Transportation24397–419
43.
Van der LippeTSiegersJ J, 1994, “Division of household and paid labour between partners: effects of relative wage rates and social norms”Kyklos47(1) 109–136
44.
Van der LippeTJagerAKopsY, 2006, “Combination pressure: the paid work- family balance of men and women in European countries”Acta Sociologica49303–319
45.
Van der ValkJ, 2005, “Arbeidsdeelname van paren” [Labour force participation of couples]Sociaal-Economische Trends 3e kwartaal 27–31
46.
Van HamM, 2001, “Workplace mobility and occupational achievement”International Journal of Population Geography7295–306
47.
Van HamM, 2002Job Access, Workplace Mobility, and Occupational Achievement (Eburon, Delft)
48.
Van HamMBüchelF, 2006, “Unwilling or unable? Spatial and socio-economic restrictions on females labour market access”Regional Studies40345–357
49.
Van HamMHooimeijerP, 2005, “Spatial barriers and labour flexibility: individual restrictions and market constraints on job mobility”, Directie ruimtelijk Economisch Beleid, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague
50.
Van HamMHooimeijerPMulderC H, 2001a, “Urban form and job access: disparate realities in the Randstad”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie92231–246
51.
Van HamMMulderC HHooimeijerP, 2001b, “Spatial flexibility in job mobility: macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions”Environment and Planning A33921–940
52.
Van OmmerenJ, 1996Commuting and Relocation of Jobs and Residences: A Search Perspective (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam)
53.
Van WeiFKnijnT, 2006, “Transitional phase or new balance”Journal of Family Issues27633–651
54.
VisserJ, 2002, “The first part-time economy in the world: a model to be followed?”Journal of European Social Policy12(1) 23–42
