In debates about employment creation there is increasing concern about the quality as well as the quantity of jobs. The authors examine the regional distribution of workplace employment in the UK using the ‘quality of jobs’ framework. Findings reveal evidence of marked regional differences in average ‘job quality’, with the gap between regions growing over the decade from 1997, and the focus of high-quality job creation biased towards already advantaged regions. There is evidence of increased job polarisation across most UK regions. The analyses suggest an important role of the public sector in providing high-quality jobs, particularly outside London and the South East.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AghionPHowittP, 1998Endogenous Growth Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
2.
AtheyGLucciPWebberC, 2007, “Two-track cities: The challenge of sustaining growth and building opportunity”, DP 11, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
3.
AutorD HLevyFMurnaneR J, 2003, “The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration”Quarterly Journal of Economics1181279–1333.
4.
BeattyCFothergillS, 2005, “The diversion from ‘unemployment’ to ‘sickness’ across British regions and districts”Regional Studies39837–854.
5.
BeattyCFothergillSPowellR, 2007, “Twenty years on: Has the economy of the UK coalfields recovered?”Environment and Planning A391654–1675.
6.
BlackabyDManningD, 1990, “The north south divide-questions of existence and stability”Economic Journal100510–521.
7.
BrinkleyI, 2006Defining the Knowledge Economy (The Work Foundation, London).
8.
DCLG, 2007, “A framework for intervention”, Economics Paper 1, Department of Communities and Local Government, London.
9.
DorlingDThomasB, 2004People and Places: A Census Atlas of the UK (Policy Press, Bristol).
10.
DuncanODuncanB, 1955, “A methodological analysis of segregation indices”American Sociological Review20210–217.
11.
DurantonGPugaD, 2004, “Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4: Cities and Geography Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ-F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2063–2117.
12.
DurantonGPugaD, 2005, “From sectoral to functional urban specialisation”Journal of Urban Economics57343–370.
13.
ElhorstJ, 2003, “The mystery of regional unemployment differentials: Theoretical and empirical explanations”Journal of Economic Surveys17709–748.
14.
ErdemEGlynA, 2001, “Job deficits in UK regions”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics63 SI737–752.
15.
FothergillS, 2001, “The true scale of the regional problem in the UK”Regional Studies35241–246.
16.
FothergillS, 2005, “A new regional policy for Britain”Regional Studies39659–667.
17.
FujitaMTakatoshiT, 1997, “Regional growth in postwar Japan”Regional Science and Urban Economics27643–670.
18.
GoosMManningA, 2007, “Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain”Review of Economics and Statistics89118–133.
19.
GreenAOwenD, 1998Where are the Jobless? Changing Unemployment and Non-employment in Cities and Regions (Policy Press, Bristol).
20.
GreenAOwenD, 2006The Geography of Poor Skills and Access to Work (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York).
21.
HepworthMBinksJZiemannB, 2005Regional Employment and Skills in the Knowledge Economy: A Report for the UK Department of Trade and Industry (Department of Trade and Industry, London).
22.
HM Treasury, 2001Productivity in the UK: 3—The Regional DimensionHM Treasury, London.
23.
HM Treasury, 2003Productivity in the UK: 4—The Local DimensionHM Treasury, London.
24.
HutchensR, 1991, “Segregation curves, Lorenz curves, and inequality in the distribution of people across occupations”Mathematical Social Sciences2131–51.
25.
KaplanisI, 2007, “The geography of employment polarisation in Britain”, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
26.
LeitchS, 2006Prosperity for All in the Global Economy—World Class SkillsHM Treasury, London.
