Conflicts over the installation of wind farms constrain the potential to adopt an effective means for mitigating climate change. Although conventional wisdom attributes wind farm opposition to ‘not in my back yard’ attitudes, research shows that this explanation fails to incorporate the multiplicity of underlying motivations of opposition. Instead, distributional and institutional factors and procedural opportunities for public participation significantly influence support for wind farms. We consider the relevance of a political ecology explanation of wind farm conflicts by focusing on a case study in rural Catalonia, Spain. We argue that the conflict constitutes a recurrence of older and broader ‘centre’–‘periphery’ antagonisms and that two more explanatory elements are complementary to this political ecology explanation: the existence of alternative landscape valuations and the encouragement of instrumental rationality by the planning framework. We suggest that the absence of opportunities for meaningful deliberation in decision making and the predominance of decisional bottom lines curtail claims to fairer distribution of costs and benefits from locally hosted energy developments, as well as alternative landscape value claims, and that this fuels conflict.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtsL, 2003, “Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21905–924
2.
AmelaV M, 2006, “Los aerogeneradores atentan contra Picasso” [The wind turbines attempt on Picasso]La Vanguardia 1 April, page 80
3.
Arrufat i ViñolesRGrau i FolchJ JSabaté i BorràsJ, 1993La Terra Alta: Estructures Productives i Evolució Social [Terra Alta: Productive structures and social evolution]Caixa Catalunya, Barcelona
4.
AymíO, 2006, “La masificación no será obstáculo para autorizar nuevos parques” [Massification will not be an obstacle to authorising new wind farms]El Pais 21 February
5.
BellDGrayTHaggettC, 2005, “The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses”Environmental Politics14460–477
6.
BerbísS, 2006, “Els promoters eòlics auguren una pluja de diners” [Wind farm promoters predict a rain of money]El Periodica 24 November
7.
BlaikiePBrookfieldH, 1987Land Degradation and Society (Methuen, London)
8.
BlaserM, 2004, “Life projects: Indigenous peoples' agency and development”, in In the Way of Development: Indigenous Peoples, Life Projects and Globalisation Eds BlaserMFeitH A (Zed Books, London) pp 26–44
9.
BlaserMFeitH A, 2004In the Way of Development: Indigenous Peoples, Life Projects and Globalisation (Zed Books, London)
10.
ButlerJ, 1997The Psychic Life of Power (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
11.
Consell Comarcal de la Terra Alta, 2006, “Mansanes i pataques: Arts plàstiques a la Terra Alto” [Apples and potatoes: Plastic arts in Terra Alta], Zero Mig Partit Perl Mig, Corbera d'Ebre i el Pinell de Brai, Barcelona
12.
DeltellB, 2007, “Fanalet vermell per al Priorat i la Terra Alta” [Red light for Priorat and Terra Alta]Avui 14 March, page 19
13.
Devine-WrightP, 2003, “Public participation, social influence and the shaping of support for wind energy in the UK”, working paper on renewable energy, Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester
14.
Devine-WrightP, 2005, “Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy”Wind Energy8125–139
15.
DryzekJ S, 2000Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Generalitat de Catalunya, 2002, “Pla territorial sectorial de la implantació ambiental de l'energia eòlica a Catalunya” [Territorial sector plan for the environmental implementation of wind energy in Catalonia], Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, http://mediambient.gencat.net/Images/43_40753.pdf
GruesoLRoseroCEscobarA, 1998, “The process of black community organizing in the Southern Pacific coast region of Colombia”, in Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultura: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements Eds AlvarezS EDagninoEEscobarA (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 196–218
20.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action (Beacon, Boston, MA)
21.
HealeyP, 1997Collaborative Planning—Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Macmillan, London)
22.
HealeyP, 1998, “Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning”Environment and Planning A301531–1546
23.
HornborgA, 2001The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology and Environment (Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA)
24.
IDESCAT, 2007Estadística Básica Territorial, Comarques [Basic Territorial Statistics, Comarcas], Institut d'Estadística de Catalunya, Barcelona
25.
IEAWIND, 2006IEAWIND 2006 Annual ReportInternational Energy Agency, Paris
26.
KemptonWFirestoneJLilleyJRouleauTWhitakerP, 2005, “The off-shore wind power debate: Views from Cape Cod”Coastal Management33119–149
27.
KhanJ, 2003, “Wind power planning in three Swedish municipalities”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46563–581
28.
LambertJElixJ, 2005, “Wind farm proposals: Engaging the community early and often”, paper presented at the 7th annual ‘Australian Wind Energy Association Conference’, 16–19 August, Sydney, Australia, Clean Energy Council, Suite 2, Level 6, 330 Collins Street, Melbourne 3000
McAvoyG E, 1998, “Partisan probing and democratic decisionmaking: Rethinking the NIMBY syndrome”Policy Studies26274–292
31.
McGuirkP M, 2001, “Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge”Environment and Planning A33195–217
32.
Martínez-AlierJ, 2002The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
33.
MichaudKCarlisleJ ESmithE R A N, 2008, “Nimbyism vs environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development”Environmental Politics1720–39
34.
MorenoG, 2006, “La plataforma de la Terra Alta replica les ‘mentides’ del president d'Eoliccat” [Terra Alta Platform reply to the ‘lies’ of Eoliccat chairman]El Punt 21 June, http://www.vilaweb.cat/wwwelpunt/noticia?p_idcmp=1962803
35.
NelloO, 2003Aquí, No!: Els Conflictes Territorials a Catalunya [Not here! Territorial conflicts in Catalonia] (Biblioteca universal Empuriés, Barcelona)
36.
O'HareM, 1977, “Not on MY block you don't: Facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation”Public Policy25407–458
37.
OlivéM CAlayJ C, 1994, “Art, història i natura: La Terra Alta, un projecte de futur” [Art, history and nature: Terra Alta, a project for the future], Actes de les Primeres Jornades d'Estudi sobre la Terra Alta [Acts of the First Conference on the Study of Terra Alta], Centre d'Estudis de la Terra Alta, Avda Catalunya sn, 43780 Gandesa
38.
PasqualettiM, 2001, “Wind energy landscapes: Society and technology”Society and Natural Resources14689–699
39.
PaulsonSGezonL LWattsM, 2003, “Locating the political in political ecology: An introduction”Human Organization62205–217
40.
PeetRWattsM, 1996Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements (Routledge, New York)
41.
PendallR, 1999, “Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond”Urban Affairs Review35112–136
42.
Plataforma per la Defensa de la Terra Alta, 2006, “La Terra Alta existein” [Terra Alta exists], Plataforma per la Defensa de la Terra Alta, http://www.plataformaterraalta.com
StrachanPLalA, 2004, “Wind energy policy, planning and management practice in the UK: Hot air or a gathering storm?”Regional Studies38551–571
46.
StratfordEJaskolskiM, 2004, “In pursuit of sustainability? Challenges for deliberative democracy in a Tasmanian local government”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31311–324
47.
TokeD, 2002, “Wind power in UK and Denmark: Can rational choice help explain different outcomes?”Environmental Politics1183–100
48.
TokeDBreukeresSWolsinkM, 2008, “Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences?”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews121129–1147
49.
ToscanoA, 2007, “David Harvey”Development and Change381127–1135
50.
WolsinkM, 1994, “Entanglement of interests and motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY theory on facility siting”Urban Studies31851–866
51.
WolsinkM, 2000, “Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support”Renewable Energy2149–64
52.
WolsinkM, 2007, “Planning of rewewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation”Energy Policy352692–2704
53.
YinR, 2003Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
