This paper investigates the normalization of military institutions through narratives of global cooperation—a phenomenon that I call cosmopolitan militarism. Empirically, I analyze how the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) uses globalist spatial imaginaries to frame military approaches to political problems as enlightened and good (as well as necessary). In particular, I examine how this framing is effected by nonstate actors in the civil society—for example, through educational and entertainment events organized for young people by nongovernmental organizations. Theoretically, I illuminate the multiple scales, sites, and agents of militarization in Western liberal democracies. I foreground the production of a particular kind of normative space for Western military force. This is an expansive and open space in which the outsiders are gradually pulled into NATO's networks of cooperation. To understand how it operates, we need to examine not only institutions of the nation-state but also transnational networks of cooperation.
BabstS, 2004, “Public diplomacy for NATO's Istanbul summit: Video interview with Dr. Stefanie Babst, Head of NATO countries section, Public Diplomacy Division”, 15 June, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2004/s040614b.htm
DalbyS, 1996, “Writing critical geopolitics: Campbell, O Tuathail, Reynolds and dissident skepticism”Political Geography15655–660
17.
DalbyS, 2005, “Political space: Autonomy, liberalism, and empire”Alternatives30415–441
18.
Der DerianJ, 2001Virtuous War: Mapping the Military–Industrial–Media–Entertainment Complex (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
19.
EnloeC, 2000Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
20.
EnloeC, 2004The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in an Age of Empire (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
21.
FalahG WFlintCMamadouhV, 2006, “Just war and extraterritoriality: The popular geopolitics of the United States' war on Iraq as reflected in newspapers of the Arab world”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96142–164
22.
FlintC, 2003a, “Political geography II: Terrorism, modernity, governance and governmentality”Progress in Human Geography2797–106
23.
FlintC, 2003b, “Terrorism and counter-terrorism: Geographic research questions and agendas”The Professional Geographer55161–169
24.
FlintC, 2003c, “Dying for a ‘P’? Some questions facing contemporary political geography”Political Geography22617–620
25.
FlintC (Ed.), 2005The Geography of War and Peace: From Death Camps to Diplomats (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
26.
FlintCFalahG W, 2004, “How the United States justified its war on terrorism: Prime morality and the construction of a ‘just war’”Third World Quarterly251379–1399
LutzC, 2006, “Empire is in the details”American Ethnologist33593–611
39.
MamadouhV, 2005, “Geography and war, geographers and peace”, in The Geography of War and Peace: From Death Camps to Diplomats Ed. FlintC (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 26–60
NATO Istanbul Summit, 2004, “Celebrating 10 years of Partnership for Peace”, featured in the official program on June 29 at 10:45am, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/20a04/06-istanbul/home.htm
Retort, 2005Afflicted Powers: Capital and Spectacle in a New Age of War (Verso, London)
54.
RobertsonG, 2003, “NATO shareholders report”, address by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Secretary General, Lord Robertson, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Parliamentary Assembly, Orlando, 11 November, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2003/s031111a.htm
55.
SchefferJ, 2004, “A new Atlanticism for the 21st century”, speech by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, at the Conference of the German Marshall Fund, Istanbul, 27 June, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2004/s040627a.htm
56.
SchefferJ, 2006, “Global NATO: Overdue or overstretch?”, speech by the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, at the Security and Defence Agenda Conference, Brussels, 6 November, http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2006/s061106a.htm
57.
ScottJ C, 2005, “Afterword to ‘moral economies, state spaces, and categorical violence’”American Anthropologist107395–402
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2006SIPRI Yearbook 2006: Armaments, Disarmament and International SecurityStockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm
63.
The Economist2002, “Transformed?: A survey of the defence industry”, 20 July, page 1–12
64.
The Economist2006, “NATO's future: Predictions of its death were premature”, 23 November, page 14–16
65.
ThriftN, 2006, “Immaculate warfare? The spatial politics of extreme violence”, in Violent Geographies: Fear, Terror and Political Violence Eds GregoryDPredA (Routledge, New York) pp 273–294
66.
WoodE, 2003, “A manifesto for global capitalism?”, in Debating Empire Ed. BalakrishnanG (Verso, London) pp 250–261
