We identify and explore the parallels and differences between gated communities and land invasions as forms of residential territory in cities of the South. Using the case of Cape Town, South Africa, the parallel narratives regarding the reasons for invading or gating land are analysed and placed in contrast with an inconsistent state response. For while both ‘gaters' and ‘invaders' are driven by similar desires for a secure home and private autonomy, the state responds very differently, regulating the former as rational residents, and disparaging the latter as unreasonable criminals. Thus, we explore the legitimacy of the two territories, challenging traditional responses to gated communities and land invasions, and arguing for an understanding of both as reflective of citizens' desires for secure homes. Although gated communities and land invasions represent diverse housing types, we suggest that it is useful to analyse them in direct empirical relation. In doing so, we do not narrowly conceptualise Southern cities as slum nuclei or divided postcolonial citadels (Robinson, 2003), but as complex and contradictory sites in which diverse residents and urban processes function in the context of state (dis)engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlsayyadNRoyA, 2006, “Medieval modernity: On citizenship and urbanism in a global era”Space and Polity101–20
2.
Álvarez-RivadullaM J, 2007, “Golden ghettos: Gated communities and class residential segregation in Montevideo, Uruguay”Environment and Planning A3947–63
3.
AskewM, 2002Bangkok: Place, Practice and Representation (Routledge, London)
4.
BallardR, 2004, “Assimilation, emigration, semigration and integration: ‘White’ peoples strategies for finding a comfort zone in post-apartheid South Africa”, in Under Construction: ‘Race’ and Identity in South Africa Today Eds DistillerNSteynM (Heinemann, Johannesburg) pp 51–66
5.
BeallJCrankshawOParnellS, 2000, “Victims, villains and fixers: The urban environment and Johannesburg's poor”Journal of Southern African Studies26833–855
6.
BeallJParnellSCrankshawO, 2002Uniting a Divided City: Governance and Social Exclusion in Johannesburg (Earthscan, London)
7.
BlakelyESnyderM G, 1997Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
8.
BondP, 2000Cities of Gold, Townships of Coal: Essays on South Africa's New Urban Crisis (Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ)
9.
BoonyabanchaS, 2005, “Baan Mankong: Going to scale with ‘slum’ and squatter upgrading in Thailand”Environment and Urbanization1721–46
10.
BremnerL, 2004, “Bounded spaces: Demographic anxieties in post-apartheid Johannesburg”Social Identities10455–468
11.
BuddsJTeixeiraP, 2005, “Ensuring the right to the city: Pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalization in Sao Paulo, Brazil”Environment and Urbanization1789–114
12.
BurraS, 2005, “Towards a pro-poor framework for slum upgrading in Mumbai, India”Environment and Urbanization1767–88
13.
CaldeiraT P R, 1999, “Fortified enclaves: The new urban segregation”, in Cities and Citizenship Ed. HolstonJ (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 114–138
14.
CaldeiraT P R, 2000City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
15.
Cape Argus2005, “Fury over call to halt ‘rich’ developments”, 14 August, page 1
16.
Cape Argus2006, “Controversial red ants marching to Cape Town”, 18 November, page 5
17.
City of Cape Town, 2006, “Importing the Nkonki data set into Council's Housing Register”, Report to Executive Mayor, 21 November (Item No. MC 30/11/06)
City of Cape Town v Neville Rudolph and 49 Others2004, High Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, Case No. 5 SA 39
20.
City of Cape Town v Residents of Philippi Road Reserve2003, High Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, Case No. A5/2003
21.
CoyMPöhlerM, 2002, “Gated communities in Latin American megacities: Case studies in Brazil and Argentina”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29355–370
22.
DAG, 2007, “Upgrading informal settlements: South African policy and praxis”, Development Action Group, 101 Lower Main Road, Observatory, Cape Town
23.
DavisM, 1992, “Beyond blade runner: Urban control—the ecology of fear”, Open Magazine Pamphlet Series 23, Open Media, Westfield, New Jersey
24.
DavisM, 2006Planet of Slums (Verso, London)
25.
du PlessisJ, 2005, “The growing problem of forced evictions and the crucial importance of community-based, locally appropriate alternatives”Environment and Urbanisation17147–170
26.
du PlessisJ, 2006, “Forced evictions, development and the need for community-based, locally appropriate alternatives: Lessons and challenges from South Africa, Ghana and Thailand”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 180–206
27.
Durand-LasserveARoystonL, 2002Holding Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries (Earthscan, London)
28.
FernandesE, 2003, “Illegal housing: Law, property rights and urban space”, in Confronting Fragmentation: Housing and Urban Development in a Democratising Society Eds HarrisonPHuchzermeyerMMayekisoM (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 228–243
29.
GrahamN, 2006, “Informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town: Challenges, constraints and contradictions within local government”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 231–249
30.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructure, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
31.
HarrisonPHuchzermeyerMMayekisoM, 2003, “Confronting fragmentation”, in Confronting Fragmentation: Housing and Urban Development in a Democratising Society Eds HarrisonPHuchzermeyerMMayekisoM (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 1–10
32.
HasanAPatelSSatterthwaiteD, 2005, “How to meet the millennium development goals (MDGS) in urban areas”Environment and Urbanization173–19
33.
HookDVrdoljakM, 2002, “Gated communities, heterotopia and a ‘rights’ of privilege: A ‘heterotopology’ of the South African security park”Geoforum33195–219
34.
HuchzermeyerM, 2002, “Upgrading through the project-linked capital subsidy: Implications for the strategies of informal settlement residents and their community organisations”Urban Forum1367–85
35.
HuchzermeyerM, 2003a, “Housing rights in South Africa: Invasions, evictions, the media, and the courts in the cases of Grootboom, Alexandra and Bredell”Urban Forum1480–107
36.
HuchzermeyerM, 2003b, “Addressing segregation through housing policy and finance”, in Confronting Fragmentation: Housing and Urban Development in a Democratising Society Eds HarrisonPHuchzermeyerMMayekisoM (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 211–227
37.
HuchzermeyerM, 2004Unlawful Occupation: Informal Settlements and Urban Policy in South Africa and Brazil (Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ)
38.
HuchzermeyerMKaramA, 2006Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town)
39.
JamesJ, 2006, “Misguided investments in meeting millennium development goals: A reconsideration using ends-based targets”Third World Quarterly27453–458
40.
JenkinsP, 2006, “Informal settlements: Infernal and eternal? The role of research in policy advocacy and urban informal settlements in Angola”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 84–100
JürgensUGnadMBährJ, 2003, “New forms of class and racial segregation: Ghettos or ethnic enclaves?”, in Emerging Johannesburg: Perspectives on the Post-apartheid City Eds TomlinsonRBeauregardR ABremnerLManguX (Routledge, London) pp 56–70
43.
KhanFThringP, 2003Housing Policy and Practice in Post-apartheid South Africa (Heineman, Sandown, South Africa)
44.
LandmanK, 2000a, “An overview of enclosed neighbourhoods in South Africa”, CSIR Building and Constriction Technology, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001, http://www.gatedcomsa.co.za/docs/enclneighb_sa8.pdf
45.
LandmanK, 2000b, “The urban future: Enclosed neighbourhoods”, paper presented at the Urban Futures Conference, Johannesburg; copy available from K Landman, CSIR Built Environment, Building 2, PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001
46.
LandmanK, 2004, “Who owns the roads? Privatising public space in South African cities through neighbourhood enclosures”, paper presented at the Privatisation of Urban Space Conference, New Orleans; copy available from K Landman, CSIR Built Environment, Building 2, PO Box 395, Pretoria 0001
47.
LemanskiC, 2004, “A new apartheid? The spatial implications of fear of crime in Cape Town, South Africa”Environment and Urbanization16101–112
48.
LemanskiC, 2006a, “Spaces of exclusivity or connection: Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master-plan development”Urban Studies43397–420
49.
LemanskiC, 2006b, “Residential responses to fear (of crime plus) in two Cape Town suburbs: Implications for the post-apartheid city”Journal of International Development18787–802
50.
LemanskiCDuringtonMLandmanK, 2008, “Divergent and similar experiences of ‘gating’ in South Africa: Johannesburg, Durban and Cape Town”Urban Forum19133–158
51.
MarcuseP, 1997, “The ghetto of exclusion and the fortified enclave”American Behavioural Scientist41311–336
52.
MartinRMathemaA, 2006, “Clash of civilisation: Reflection on the problems of upgrading informal settlements in Ethiopia, Kenya, Swaziland and Zambia”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 126–145
53.
MngxitamaA, 2006, “National Land Committee, 1994–2004: A critical insider's perspective”, in Challenging Hegemony: Social Movements and the Quest for a New Humanism in South Africa Ed. GibsonN C (Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ) pp 157–201
54.
MycooM, 2006, “The retreat of the upper and middle classes to gated communities in the poststructural adjustment era: The case of Trinidad”Environment and Planning A38131–148
55.
MyersG, 2006, “The un-authorized city: Late-colonial Lusaka and post-colonial geography”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography27231–234
56.
NahnsenA, 2003, “Discourses and procedures of desire and fear in the re-making of Cape Town's central city: The need for a spatial politics of reconciliation”, in Ambiguous Restructurings of post-apartheid Cape Town Eds HaferburgCOßenbrüggeJ (Lit Verlag Münster, Hamburg) pp 130–156
57.
OldfieldS, 2000, “The centrality of community capacity in state low-income housing provision in Cape Town, South Africa”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24858–872
58.
OldfieldS, 2002, “Partial formalization and its implications for community governance in an informal settlement”Urban Forum13102–115
59.
OmenyaAHuchzermeyerM, 2006, “Slum upgrading in the complex context of policy change: The case of Nairobi”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 290–311
60.
PayneG, 2005, “Getting ahead of the game: A twin-track approach to improving existing slums and reducing the need for future slums”Environment and Urbanisation17135–146
61.
PieterseE, 2003, “Problematising and recasting vision-driven politics in Cape Town”, in Ambiguous Restructurings of Post-apartheid Cape Town Eds HaferburgCOßenbrüggeJ (Lit Verlag Münster, Hamburg) pp 157–188
62.
PithouseR, 2006, “Coffin for the Councillor: A report on the emergence of a shack dwellers' movement in South Africa”Journal of Asian and African Studies41171–184
63.
RaoV, 2006, “Review essay—slum as theory: The South/Asian city and globalization”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30225–232
64.
RobinsS, 2002, “At the limits of spatial governmentality: A message from the tip of Africa”Third World Quarterly23665–689
65.
RobinsonJ, 1998, “Spaces of democracy: Remapping the apartheid city”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16533–548
66.
RobinsonJ, 2003, “Postcolonialising geography: Tactics and pitfalls”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography24273–289
67.
RolnikRCymbalistaR, 2003, “Self-managed housing construction: The experience of São Paulo”, in Confronting Fragmentation: Housing and Urban Development in a Democratising Society Eds HarrisonPHuchzermeyerMMayekisoM (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 278–293
68.
RossF, 2005, “Model communities and respectable residents? Home and housing in a low-income residential estate in the western Cape, South Africa”Journal of Southern African Studies31631–648
69.
RoystonL, 2003, “On the outskirts: Access to well-located land and integration in post-apartheid human settlement development”, in Housing Policy and Practice in Post-apartheid South Africa Eds KhanFThringP (Heineman, Sandown, South Africa) pp 234–255
SachsA, 2004, “Port Elizabeth municipality v various occupiers”, Constitutional Court of South Africa, CCT 53/03
72.
SalcedoRTorresA, 2004, “Gated communities in Santiago: Wall or frontier?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2827–44
73.
SchlyterA, 1998, “Housing policy in Zambia”Habitat International22259–271
74.
SharmaK, 2000Rediscovering Dharavi: Stories from Asia's Largest Slum (Penguin Books, New Delhi)
75.
SmitW, 2006, “Understanding the complexity of informal settlements: Insights from Cape Town”, in Informal Settlements: A Perpetual Challenge? Eds HuchzermeyerMKaramA (University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town) pp 103–125
76.
TomlinsonM, 1998, “South Africa's new housing policy: An assessment of the first two years, 1994–96”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research22137–146
77.
TurokI, 2001, “Persistent polarisation post-apartheid? Progress towards urban integration in Cape Town”Urban Studies382349–2377
